Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E1405 2021.04.01 Urban Limits Maliana
E1405 2021.04.01 Urban Limits Maliana
1. INTRODUCTION
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 2
1. INTRODUCTION
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 3
1. INTRODUCTION
This presentation concerns the assignment for “Preparation of Master Plans for
Municipal Capitals Water Supply and Sanitation, Ainaro, Maliana and Suai”.
This project will be closed in June 2021, only 9 months, started last October.
This is a preliminary analysis of the proposed geographical limits for the municipal
capitals, as well as the as well as the corresponding population evolution until the year
2040
The presented results are estimations, not projections, since one does not have the
necessary baseline data to elaborate projections at suco and aldeia levels.
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 5
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
On the planning side, the concept of urban areas currently utilized in Timor-Leste is the
one use by Population Statistics, including (Census Report, 2010):
• “All district capitals were considered as urban areas. The boundaries of the district
capitals are the ones provided in the built up areas.
• “Areas which had following characteristics qualified as urban, which means that they:
a) have a population of about 2,000 people or more;
b) have less than 50 per cent of its population employed in agricultural/fishing
activities and the remaining people employed in the modern sector;
c) have electricity and piped water,
d) have access to schools, medical care and recreational facilities.”
HOWEVER:
• Even knowing the limits of the enumeration sections, it does not follow that the water
supply areas should be coincident with the limits of capitals, since urban expansion
happens, and water needs do not stop at the administrative limits.
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 9
3. BOUNDARIES DEFINITION
CRITERIA
The criteria adopted for the definition of urban boundaries were based on the
criteria of continuity and contiguity of housing and urban equipment.
The proposed urban areas consider currently SMASA water supplied areas
Given the above context:
i) What are the criteria for establishing
water supply areas’ boundaries?
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 11
4. POPULATION EVOLUTION
ESTIMATIONS
Population data:
Four scenarios were considered to estimate population’s volume evolution until 2040:
Scenario 1:
Population evolution was calculated applying the annual growth rates considered in
DGE projections for Maliana municipality level. As DGE projections are available
only until 2030, it was assumed that the last annual growth rate considered in DGE
projections (2029-2030) would keep constant until 2040.
Scenario 1I:
As an alternative scenario, it was considered that the growth rates from 2030 to
2040 would go on growing, following the same tendency registered for the period
2028-2029-2030 of DGE’s projections. This scenario results are different from
scenario 1 ones only after 2030.
Scenario III:
Since growth rates at municipality level can be different and can be expected to be lower
than the growth rates registered in the urban areas of municipality capitals, a third
scenario was considered applying a higher growth rate, based on the average annual
growth rate registered for the study area for the whole period 2004 to 2020. It was
considered the average annual growth rate registered for study area sucos aggregate,
between 2004 and 2020, which was 3,20%. Then it was assumed that, for the period
2020-2040, the population would grow at a constant annual rate that is a half (1,60%) of
the above annual growth rate registered for the period 2004-2020.
This is an optimistic scenario.
Scenario IV:
Since the differences between the results obtained from scenarios I/II to scenario III are
significant, mainly because DGE projections to Bobonaro municipality seem to be very
low having in account the population growth rates observed between 2004 and 2020, it
was considered a fourth scenario.
This fourth scenario resulted from the application of the growth rates of DGE projections
to Bobonaro municipality based on 2010 Census results (1,23% to 1,37%), which are
much higher than the DGE projections to Bobonaro municipality based on 2015 Census
results (-0,05% to 0,48%). Both DGE projections are done until 2030.
In this fourth scenario we assumed that the last DGE growth rates (1,37% in 2029, and
also 1,37% in 2030) would keep constant until 2040.
This is an intermediate scenario between scenarios I/II and scenario III, although more
close to scenario III.
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 17
4. MALIANA
Scenario 1:
Scenario II:
Scenario III:
Scenario IV:
Population estimation
33539
33010
32491
31979 31884
31475 31453
30979 31028
30492 30609
30011 30195
29539 29787
29384
29073 28987
28616 28596
28165 28209
27721 27828
27285 27452
268552671727081 26909
2643226364 26400
2601626021 25989
25606 25684 25656
25203 25357 25168 25387 2513925205
2480625037
24723 24549 24628
24614 24725
24679 24844
24744 2481024875249412500725073
24989
24415244052439324382243742436924374243952443224485
24415
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Pop. Density
Scenario (Inhab./km2)
2040
I 1 616
II 1 725
III 2 150
IV 2 044
2. TERRITORY CONTEXT
5. MALIANA
MPW-CS-200029 - MASTER PLAN FOR THE MUNICIPAL CAPITALS WATER SUPPLY AND
SANITATION (AINARO-MALIANA-SUAI) 29
OBRIGADU BARAK