Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 1 - Fundamentals of Auditing and Assurance Services
Lesson 1 - Fundamentals of Auditing and Assurance Services
Transaction Cycles
ASSURANCE SERVICES:
Subject Matter: the “nature” of the assertion the practitioner gathers sufficient
evidence.
Appropriate subject matter are verifiable (identifiable and capable of consistent evaluation or measurement
against identified criteria such that the information can be subjected to procedures for gathering sufficient
appropriate evidence to support reasonable assurance or limited assurance conclusion, as appropriate.)
Financial performance, non-financial performance, physical characteristics, systems and processes, and
behavior
Question: A suitable criteria exhibits the following characteristics,
except for:
a. Verifiable
b. Understandable
c. Neutrality
d. Completeness
Suitable Criteria
Underlying
Subject
Matter
Subject
Matter
Information
Suitable
Criteria
Evidence are information gathered by the practitioner in evaluating the subject matter against criteria, on
which the conclusion is based.
Question: The sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence are
interrelated. Which of the following statements incorrectly relates to
these concepts?
Audit
Evidence
Materiality
Assurance Engagement Risk
Assurance engagement risk is the risk that practitioner expresses an inappropriate conclusion when the
subject matter information is materially misstated.
Professional Skepticism
An attitude that includes a questioning mind, being alert to conditions that may indicate possible
misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical assessment of the evidence.
Question: Which of the following statements inappropriately relates to
professional judgment?
Practitioner Responsible
Responsible Party Practitioner
Party
Users Users
Assurance Engagement as to Structure
Attestation (Assertion-Based) Direct Reporting Engagements
Engagements
Party responsible for subject Responsible Party Responsible Party
matter
Party who measures/evaluates the Responsible Party Practitioner
subject matter
Party who provides assurance Practitioner Practitioner
Availability of subject matter Available to Intended Users Availability to Intended Users
RISKS
Three Lines of Defense Model
Types of Audit
FS Audit Operational Audit Compliance Audit
Assertions FS are fairly presented. Operations are conducted Activities complied with
efficiently and effectively. applicable laws, rules and
regulations, contracts or
management policy
Suitable criteria GAAP or any other identified Objectives set by Applicable laws, rules and
financial reporting framework management regulations, contracts or
management policy
Report An opinion whether FS are Report on efficiency and Degree of compliance report
fairly presented in conformity effectiveness (including
with an identified financial recommendations)
reporting framework
Generally performed by External auditors Internal Auditors Government Auditors
Financial Statements Audit
Responsibility Measure / Assure
Evaluate
Historical
Financial Audit Report
Financial
Statements
Information
Users
Objectives of Financial Statements Audit
• To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the FS as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error
• To enable an auditor to express an opinion as to whether the financial statements are prepared, in all
material respects, in accordance with applicable financial reporting framework.
Auditor’s Report
The auditor provides a written report called an “audit report” which contains the conclusion or
opinion conveying the assurance obtained about the financial statements.
In addition, the auditor considers other reporting responsibilities, including communicating with
those charged with governance.
Audit Assertions
Representations made by management, explicit or otherwise, that are embodied in the financial statements
as used by the auditor to consider the different types of potential misstatements that may occur.
Code of Ethics
Professional Judgment
Evidence
Engagement Standards in the Philippines