Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 2.1 Materiality in Audit of FS
Lesson 2.1 Materiality in Audit of FS
Materiality
Audit Planning Activities: Define Materiality
Note: In 2022, 1.5% of Revenues was used to determine the overall materiality. However, in 2023, the
current year’s rise in revenue is not expected to be repeated in future years due to exceptional orders
during the year. Also, auditors assessed higher risks in 2022 thereby assigning a lower materiality
percentage.
Two functions:
Performance • Reduce the aggregation risk (the aggregate of
Materiality uncorrected and undetected misstatements
individually below materiality will exceed overall
(working materiality, helps
materiality)
guide auditors to do enough • Provide a safety net against risk of undetected
work to support their audit) misstatements.
Note: Usually audit methodologies require performance materiality to be a % of overall materiality. The
higher the assessed risk, the lower the percentage. Typically, the percentage range from 75% (low
risk) to 50% (high risk).
Example: 2023 Planned Approach
Amount of Prepayments Assuming Performance Materiality is 50% of Overall Materiality
Scenario 1: P100,000 Do nothing as there is no risk of material misstatement.
Scenario 2: P700,000 More than performance materiality, but not significant. Auditors may
carry out analytical procedures based on expected prepayments.
Scenario 3: P1,500,000 As this is considerably more than performance materiality,
more evidence is needed to be deemed sufficient. For
example, auditors may decide to test a sample of individual
transactions.
If lower materiality has been set for specific
balances, classes of transactions or disclosures
Specific Materiality auditors will need to apply a lower performance
materiality here as well.