Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LECTURE 2 TU in India
LECTURE 2 TU in India
Rights
Directive
Fundamental
Principles of
Rights
State Policy
Fundamental Rights
Equality before Law (14)
Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of
speech, assembly, movement, profession, residence,
OF ASSOCIATION (19)
Protection of life and personal liberty (21)
Right to education (21-A)
Prohibition of traffic in human beings & forced
labour (23)
Prohibition of employment of children in factories,
construction industry, hazardous employment
DPSP – PART - IV
• https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/wal
mart-india-sacks-50-top-executives-across-divi
sions-in-its-headquarters
• Brief History of TU movement
Trade Union Movement in India
• First labour union is Madras Labour Union formed in 1918
• First central trade union (CTU) formed was ALL INDIA TRADE
UNION CONGRESS (AITUC) in 1920
• During the freedom movement political parties like the
Indian National Congress (INC) & others organized workers so
as to widen the freedom movement base
• At the same time, workers benefited from the support from
political parties, other outside leaders from missionary
organisations, people with Left/Socialist Ideologies, social
activists, lawyers and others
• This led to two strong features of trade union movement:
POLITICAL UNIONS AND DOMINANCE OF OUTSIDE
LEADERSHIP
• The Communist Party of India was formed in the mid-1920s.
• AITUC had during the 1920s and 1930s three groups – Congress, Socialists
and Radicals
• As a result, during 1930s – two-three splits took place due to political and
ideological reasons and reunion also took place – political (ideological) and
leadership factors played an important role
• 1939-early1947 – AITUC was dominated by communists due largely to the
absence of major leaders from the Congress party as they were all
imprisoned due to Quit India and other political protests and the
Communists occupied the important positions of the Executive Committee
(EC) of AITUC
• Early 1947 – When congress leaders returned after being freed, they found
much to their dislike the dominance of Communist ideology and leaders
• Sardar Patel and others decided to form a CTU which will be along the
ideology of Congress – INDIAN NATIONAL TRADE UNION CONGRESS (INTUC)
was formed in 1947
• During the WW-II, Dr. Ambedkar’s party and M. N. Roy in the early 1940s
floated the INDIAN FEDERATION OF LABOUR
• So at the time of Independence India had these trade unions
• After Independence: AITUC split and the splinter organizations split and
joined and split and rejoined owing to political factors
• Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS), Hind Mazdoor Panchayat (HMP), United
Trade Union Congress (UTUC), United Trade Union Congress (Lenin-
Sarani, L-S, now known as All India United Trade Union Centre (AIUTUC),
etc. were formed owing to political splits and leadership differences
• 1956, Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) was formed professing the
ideology of Hindutva as most of the trade unions were led by and
subscribed Western educated people and Western ideologies
• 1961-61 – Indo-China War broke out
• The Communist movement had two elements, the USSR-led and China-
led and CPI in India had these two elements (Sino-Soviet Split and conflict
in the 1950s)
• The China-led Communists supported China in the War and they were
jailed and the others did not
• CPI was formally split owing to this and Nehru (Congress)-USSR interface
and some supporting Congress’ economic policies in 1964
• AITUC got split in 1970 and the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) was
formed
• In the meanwhile in some regions regional
political parties emerged stronger, e.g. DMK in
Tamil Nadu and Shiv Sena in Maharashtra
• DMK won the Assembly elections in 1967
elections and Congress was routed
• DMK formed its labour wing, Labour Progressive
Federation (LPF) in the late 1960s
• Shiv Sena formed – Bhartiya Kamgar Sena (BKS)
• In the late 1960s, the Congress party split and the
INTUC split – in Tamil Nadu Trade Union Congress
and National Labour Union were formed
• All India Central Council of Trade Unions (AICCTU)
attached to CPI (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation was formed
• Self-employed working women formed SEWA in the early
1970s following the trade union-cum-cooperative models
• In the meanwhile, charismatic individual union leaders
like Kuchelar (Madras), R.J. Mehta (Bombay), Dr. Datta
Samant (Bombay), George Fernandes (Bombay) formed
their labour wings as independent trade unions – they
had their own methods of working and they did not
believe in political unionism – though Dr. Datta Samant
formed a political party (Kamgar Ahadi )which was not a
success – they all resorted to violence and unusual
methods of negotiations which earned them a great
following but short lived.
• Later each political party split due to
ideological differences or personality
differences (MGR broke away from DMK and
formed ANNA DRAVIDA MUNNETRA
KAZHAGHAM, ADMK, later it became
AIADMK; Sharad Pawar and Sangma split from
Congress; Mamta Banerjee did, Shiv Sena
split, etc. Correspondingly political unions split
and were formed.
• SO: SPLITS = f(ideology, political parties,
personalities differences)
• Independent or enterprise unions emerged as an alternative to
political unions
• These are based and limited to a company – say, Blue Star, Asian
Paints, Hindustan Lever, Dr. Reddy’s, Engine Valves, etc.
• Enterprise unions promoted high union coverage while the political
unions did not
• Political unions had macro level voices while the enterprise unions
had micro focus
• Enterprise unions usually had insider union leaders or preferred an
outsider without his/her political ideology – for e.g. A.S.
Sounderajan of CPI(M) is the leader of several unions in Tamil
Nadu, e.g. Hyundai, Foxconn, English Electric, etc. but the workers
do NOT subscribe to the CPI (M) ideology
• Political unions leverage national level or regional level political
power and have a high mobilisation potential
• Enterprise unions have higher internal cohesion but poor macro
level voices
Labour is on the Concurrent List of Constitution
of India – Central and State laws
TRADE UNIONS ACT, 1926
Those who work in Army, Navy and Air No (not employed in trade or industry
Force and Police Service or officers of
Prison
Employed mainly in managerial and Yes (employed in trade or industry)
administrative capacity and supervisors
exercising functions of managerial nature
Non- VOLUNTARY
LAW
Legal ACTION
BY EMPLOYERS
Code of
NATIONAL STATE
Discipline
TU SOME
ACT STATES
EO
Trade Multi-
IR
Bodies Advocacy