Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 6 - LPG
Unit 6 - LPG
Unit 6 - LPG
MODULE - 3
UNIT 6 - LPG
NEW ECONOMIC POLICY 1991
Reasons for implementing New Economic policy:
In the early 1990s, India faced a major crisis followed by a foreign exchange deficit,
resulting in its economic downfall. To overcome the crisis, the government came up
with adjustments to the economy by bringing new reforms. The reforms introduced
were called ‘structural reforms’ and launched under the ‘New Economic Policy (NEP)’.
Liberalisation
Liberalisation of an economy is considered a key component of NEP. Before
the New Economic Policy of 1991, the private sector was in control of the
government. Because of this, the domestic industries were not allowed to
take any decisions regarding the industry’s work without the government’s
interference. This resulted in a fall in professionalism and inefficiency of work
within the industry. With the introduction of the liberalisation policy, this
sector gained the freedom of decision-making without any interference
from the government.
The government also decided to abolish the licensing system. Before 1991, a
business needed to get a license from the government to start any
industrial activity. This resulted in a delay in getting a license, as there was a
long queue of people before the window of the government department,
seeking authorisation to get a license. This also resulted in corruption as the
officers started taking bribes to make the process faster. To end this, the
government abolished the licensing system and permitted individuals to start
their industrial activities without any permission (however permission is still
required in industries, such as medicine, defence equipment, etc.).
•Tax Reforms: There are generally two types of taxes, Direct and
Indirect Taxes. This reform included policies like the
Rationalisation of Direct Taxes, Reform in Indirect Taxes, and
Simplification of Process.
The need for privatisation was felt mainly because of the poor performance of
the Public Sector Undertakings. As a result, the consumers were facing a
major loss, as they did not receive quality products, and other services, such
as poor delivery systems, etc. With the introduction of the privatisation policy,
this factor was eliminated.
•Unlike PSUs, Privatisation promoted the diversification of production.
•Unlike PSUs, the Privatisation of enterprises generated higher profits.
•It also promoted customer superiority.
•Unlike PSUs, Privatisation provides high productivity.
•Unlike PSUs, Privatisation promoted growth and development by working in a
competitive environment.
Objectives of Privatisation
Providing strong momentum for the inflow of FDI
Privatisation aims at providing a strong base for the inflow of FDI.
The increased inflow of FDI improves the financial strength of the economy.
Improving the efficiency of public sector undertakings (PSUs)
The efficiency of PSUs is improved by giving them the autonomy to make
decisions.
Some companies were given special categories of Navratna and Miniratna.
Ways of Privatisation:
Transfer of ownership
Government companies can be converted into private companies in the following
two ways:
•By the withdrawal of the government from the ownership and management of
public sector companies
•By the outright sale of public sector companies.
Disinvestment
•Privatisation of the public sector undertakings by selling off parts of the equity
of PSUs to the private sector is known as disinvestment.
•The purpose of the sale is mainly to improve financial discipline and facilitate
modernisation.
However, there are six methods of privatisation.
•Public sale of shares
•Public auction
•Public tender
•Direct negotiations
•Transfer of control of enterprises that were controlled by the
state or by municipalities
•Lease with a right to purchase
What are the pros of privatisation?
•Improved performance and customer experience
•Politics does not interfere
•Short-term outlook
•Encouragement for shareholders to invest because of returns
•Increased competition
•The government will increase the revenue from the sale
Disadvantages of Privatization
1) Natural Monopoly
Privatization in some sectors where there is low competition may lead to
the monopoly of a single private firm. Having complete monopoly over a
particular sector, the firm gets a free hand to compromise its quality and fix
higher price rates, etc., to churn out large profits. On the other hand, a
government-run agency would have prioritized public interest over profit.
2) Decline in Public Interest
Private companies dealing mainly in public welfare sectors like health,
education, and others are more profit-oriented than welfare-oriented. This
dearly costs the common person in the form of excessive taxes, higher
prices, and a poor state of quality and services.
3) Lack of Regulations
Privatization slips the power of financial and other managerial decisions out
of the government into private hands. This means that the government has
limited or no say in the company’s decisions; neither can the government
impose much regulation over the functioning of the company or its policies.
4) Low Future Investment
Private firms, out of the government’s regulation and control, may
look out for short-term gains, compromising the long-term future
projects. This forces the companies to invest in short-term
beneficial projects rather than long-term ones.
5) Fragmentation of Companies
Privatization might lead to the breaking up of one giant company
into several other rather small enterprises. This fragmentation
ultimately decreases the efficiency and also reduces the
accountability in the management. Companies throw the
responsibility for any losses onto each other and try to escape
responsibility.
Globalisation
Globalisation refers to the integration of the economy of a country with the
economies of other countries. The process of globalisation is associated with
the free flow of trade, capital across borders, increasing openness, growing
economic independence, and deepening economic integration in the world.
The Globalisation of the economy is considered to be a complex phenomenon
as it is a result of a set of various policies that aim at integrating an economy
with the world and transforming it towards greater interdependence.
Objective of Globalisation:
•The main aim of globalisation was to integrate the Indian economy with the
global economy.
•As a result, there will be an unrestricted flow of information, goods and
services, technologies, and even people within countries, which will eventually
enhance the development of the country.
Measures adopted for Globalisation:
1. The government allowed foreign companies to hold 51 percent or more shares
of the Indian companies in the case of collaboration so that they can function
freely and as the owner.
2. This also promoted the transfer of the latest technologies into Indian territory
due to collaboration with MNCs.
3. The reduction of the tariff and non-tariff barriers, adoption of policies to
promote exports, increase in Foreign Investments, increase of foreign currency
in the country (Forex), growth of the IT industry in India, and several other
features came under the globalisation policy.
Advantages of Globalisation in India:
1. Increase in employment: With the opportunity of special economic zones
(SEZ), there is an increase in the number of new jobs available. Including
the export processing zones (EPZ) centre in India is very useful in
employing thousands of people.
Another additional factor in India is cheap labour. This feature motivates the
big companies in the west to outsource employees from other regions and
cause more employment.