Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Research Methods in Psychology

Ethical Issues in the


Conduct of
Psychological Research
Ethical Responsibilities
• Ethical Responsibilities
– Competent research
– Accurate Reporting
– Honest resource management
– Acknowledge others contributions
– Consider consequences to society
– Speak out publicly
• All psychologists (including students) must follow the APA
guides for ethical behavior.
– APA Ethics Code
• The five general values or principles for ethical conduct are
– Beneficence and Non-Malfeasance
– Fidelity and Responsibility
– Integrity
– Justice
– Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity
Ethical Issues to Consider Before Beginning Research
• Prior to conducting any study, the proposed research
must be reviewed to determine if it meets ethical
standards.
– Institutional Review Board (IRB):
• Human Subjects Research Committee (HSRC)
– At least 5 members with varying backgrounds and expertise.
– Scientists and nonscientists, at least 1 person not affiliated with the
institution.
– Reviews proposals to protect rights and welfare of human participants.
• Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
– Reviews research to make sure animals are treated humanely.
– In addition to reviewing research procedures, these committees review
the animals’ living quarters and the training procedures for those who
work with animals.
– Include at least one scientist, one veterinarian, and one person not
affiliated with the institution.
Risk/Benefit Ratio
• The risk/benefit ratio is a subjective evaluation of the
costs and benefits of a research project to:
– participants
– society
– the researcher and institution
• Is the research worth it? Will the study produce valid
and interpretable results? Cost of not doing the
research.
• There are no mathematical answers(not a quantitative
ratio); IRB and IACUC members strive for consensus
of opinion.
• Committee members can require changes to research
procedures before approving a project.
Risks in Research
• Different types of risk:
– physical injury,
– psychological injury (mental or emotional stress),
– social injury (embarrassment)
• Researchers are ethically obligated to protect
participants from all risk.
• In many psychology studies, emotional or mental
stress may be great — including stress that might
arise from participants’ misconceptions about the
task.
Minimal Risk
• harm or discomfort participants may experience
– not greater than what they might experience in their daily
lives or during routine physical or psychological tests.
• Take into account the nature of the participant
– Age
– Health
– Any other circumstances?
• If risks are considered more than minimal,
individuals are considered to be “at risk.”
– When research places participants at risk
– should seek alternative methods that have lower risk.
Confidentiality
• One way to protect participants from social risk is to
keep their responses confidential.
– remove any identifying information
– report results in terms of statistical averages
– “confidential” is not the same as “anonymous”
— responses are anonymous when individuals do not provide any
identifying information.
• Confidentiality is a special problem in Internet
research, even though participants perceive their
responses to be anonymous.
Informed Consent
• Researchers and participants enter into a social
contract, often using an informed consent
procedure.
– Researchers are ethically obligated to make clear to
participants the nature of the research (what they will do
in the experiment) and any possible risks.
– Written informed consent is essential when participants
are exposed to more than minimal risk.
– Informed consent is not necessary when researchers
observe public behavior.
FIGURE 3.4 The issue of informed consent is especially important when
children participate in research.

– Informed consent must be obtained from legal


guardians when individuals are not able to provide
consent (e.g., children, mentally impaired individuals).
– Individuals unable to provide legal consent must provide
their assent to participation.
Informed Consent (continued)
– Potential participants must be informed of all aspects of
the research that might influence their decision to
participate.
– Research participants must be allowed to withdraw their
consent at any time without penalties.
– Individuals must not be pressured to participate in
research.
• Payment for participation
• Prisoners

– Obtaining informed consent is a special problem in


Internet research.
Dispensing With Consent
• In some situations researchers are not required to obtain informed
consent.
• The clearest example is when researchers are observing individuals’
behavior in public places without any intervention. “Naturalistic
Observation”
• Three major dimensions should be considered when
trying to decide whether people’s behavior is public or
private:
– 1. the sensitivity of the information
• more sensitive information is typically regarded as more private
(e.g., sexual practices, religious beliefs)
– 2. the setting of the information
• in public settings, people give up a certain degree of privacy (e.g.,
sporting events, concerts)
– 3. Method of dissemination of the information
• sensitive information should be reported in ways so that specific
individuals cannot be identified (e.g., group averages)
Deception
• Deception occurs:
– when information is withheld from participants
– when participants are intentionally misinformed about
an aspect of the research.
• Deceiving people for the purpose of getting them
to participate in a research project is always
unethical.
• Box 3.2 A Shocking Deception
– Milgram 1960’s Obedience toAuthority
• Box 3.4 Doing Ethically Questionable Research
– Burger 2009 replication of Milgram’s research
Pros and Cons of Deception
• Pros: Why do we deceive?
– Deception allows researchers to study individuals’ natural
behavior.
– Deception allows opportunities to investigate behaviors and
mental processes not easily studied using nondeceptive
methods.
• Cons: Why should we not deceive?
– Deception contradicts the principle of informed consent.
– The relationship between researcher and participant is not
open and honest.
– Frequent use of deception may make individuals suspicious
about research and psychology.
Deception (continued)
• Deception is justified only
– when the study is very important,
– no other methods for conducting research are available,
and
– deception would not influence individuals’ decision to
participate in the research.
• When deception is used, the researcher must
– Inform participants after the experiment the reasons for the
deception,
– discuss any misconceptions they may have, and
– remove any harmful effects of the deception.
• This is called debriefing.
Research with Animals

• Should animals be used in research?


– The answer to this question is fiercely debated.
• APA Ethical Standards and IACUCs:
– The researcher who uses animal subjects is ethically
obligated to look out for their welfare and to treat
them humanely.
– Any pain, discomfort, or death must be justified by the
potential scientific, educational, or applied goals.
Reporting Psychological Research
• Publication credit:
– acknowledge fairly those who have contributed to a
research project.
– authorship should be based on the scholarly importance
of individuals’ contributions.
• Plagiarism
Don’t present substantial portions or elements of another’s
work as your own.
– Ignorance and sloppiness are not legitimate excuses.
– Cite the sources of your ideas when you use the exact words (with
quotation marks and page number) and when you paraphrase.
– Examples
Steps for Ethical Decision Making
• Permission from authors to use scales in your
research.
• Permission from host institution
• Permission from guest institution
• Written informed consent
• Find out all the facts of the situation (procedure,
who will participate, etc.)
• Identify the ethical issues that are relevant (e.g.,
risk, informed consent, privacy, confidentiality,
deception, debriefing).
• Decide what is at stake for all parties involved
(e.g., participants, researchers, institutions,
society).
• Identify alternative methods or procedures

You might also like