The document discusses key ethical issues in psychological research including obtaining informed consent, protecting participants from harm, maintaining confidentiality, the use of deception, and ensuring proper credit is given. It outlines the responsibilities of researchers to follow ethical standards set by the APA and review boards to protect human and animal subjects. Researchers must consider risks and benefits to participants and society and receive approval before conducting any studies.
The document discusses key ethical issues in psychological research including obtaining informed consent, protecting participants from harm, maintaining confidentiality, the use of deception, and ensuring proper credit is given. It outlines the responsibilities of researchers to follow ethical standards set by the APA and review boards to protect human and animal subjects. Researchers must consider risks and benefits to participants and society and receive approval before conducting any studies.
The document discusses key ethical issues in psychological research including obtaining informed consent, protecting participants from harm, maintaining confidentiality, the use of deception, and ensuring proper credit is given. It outlines the responsibilities of researchers to follow ethical standards set by the APA and review boards to protect human and animal subjects. Researchers must consider risks and benefits to participants and society and receive approval before conducting any studies.
Conduct of Psychological Research Ethical Responsibilities • Ethical Responsibilities – Competent research – Accurate Reporting – Honest resource management – Acknowledge others contributions – Consider consequences to society – Speak out publicly • All psychologists (including students) must follow the APA guides for ethical behavior. – APA Ethics Code • The five general values or principles for ethical conduct are – Beneficence and Non-Malfeasance – Fidelity and Responsibility – Integrity – Justice – Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity Ethical Issues to Consider Before Beginning Research • Prior to conducting any study, the proposed research must be reviewed to determine if it meets ethical standards. – Institutional Review Board (IRB): • Human Subjects Research Committee (HSRC) – At least 5 members with varying backgrounds and expertise. – Scientists and nonscientists, at least 1 person not affiliated with the institution. – Reviews proposals to protect rights and welfare of human participants. • Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) – Reviews research to make sure animals are treated humanely. – In addition to reviewing research procedures, these committees review the animals’ living quarters and the training procedures for those who work with animals. – Include at least one scientist, one veterinarian, and one person not affiliated with the institution. Risk/Benefit Ratio • The risk/benefit ratio is a subjective evaluation of the costs and benefits of a research project to: – participants – society – the researcher and institution • Is the research worth it? Will the study produce valid and interpretable results? Cost of not doing the research. • There are no mathematical answers(not a quantitative ratio); IRB and IACUC members strive for consensus of opinion. • Committee members can require changes to research procedures before approving a project. Risks in Research • Different types of risk: – physical injury, – psychological injury (mental or emotional stress), – social injury (embarrassment) • Researchers are ethically obligated to protect participants from all risk. • In many psychology studies, emotional or mental stress may be great — including stress that might arise from participants’ misconceptions about the task. Minimal Risk • harm or discomfort participants may experience – not greater than what they might experience in their daily lives or during routine physical or psychological tests. • Take into account the nature of the participant – Age – Health – Any other circumstances? • If risks are considered more than minimal, individuals are considered to be “at risk.” – When research places participants at risk – should seek alternative methods that have lower risk. Confidentiality • One way to protect participants from social risk is to keep their responses confidential. – remove any identifying information – report results in terms of statistical averages – “confidential” is not the same as “anonymous” — responses are anonymous when individuals do not provide any identifying information. • Confidentiality is a special problem in Internet research, even though participants perceive their responses to be anonymous. Informed Consent • Researchers and participants enter into a social contract, often using an informed consent procedure. – Researchers are ethically obligated to make clear to participants the nature of the research (what they will do in the experiment) and any possible risks. – Written informed consent is essential when participants are exposed to more than minimal risk. – Informed consent is not necessary when researchers observe public behavior. FIGURE 3.4 The issue of informed consent is especially important when children participate in research.
– Informed consent must be obtained from legal
guardians when individuals are not able to provide consent (e.g., children, mentally impaired individuals). – Individuals unable to provide legal consent must provide their assent to participation. Informed Consent (continued) – Potential participants must be informed of all aspects of the research that might influence their decision to participate. – Research participants must be allowed to withdraw their consent at any time without penalties. – Individuals must not be pressured to participate in research. • Payment for participation • Prisoners
– Obtaining informed consent is a special problem in
Internet research. Dispensing With Consent • In some situations researchers are not required to obtain informed consent. • The clearest example is when researchers are observing individuals’ behavior in public places without any intervention. “Naturalistic Observation” • Three major dimensions should be considered when trying to decide whether people’s behavior is public or private: – 1. the sensitivity of the information • more sensitive information is typically regarded as more private (e.g., sexual practices, religious beliefs) – 2. the setting of the information • in public settings, people give up a certain degree of privacy (e.g., sporting events, concerts) – 3. Method of dissemination of the information • sensitive information should be reported in ways so that specific individuals cannot be identified (e.g., group averages) Deception • Deception occurs: – when information is withheld from participants – when participants are intentionally misinformed about an aspect of the research. • Deceiving people for the purpose of getting them to participate in a research project is always unethical. • Box 3.2 A Shocking Deception – Milgram 1960’s Obedience toAuthority • Box 3.4 Doing Ethically Questionable Research – Burger 2009 replication of Milgram’s research Pros and Cons of Deception • Pros: Why do we deceive? – Deception allows researchers to study individuals’ natural behavior. – Deception allows opportunities to investigate behaviors and mental processes not easily studied using nondeceptive methods. • Cons: Why should we not deceive? – Deception contradicts the principle of informed consent. – The relationship between researcher and participant is not open and honest. – Frequent use of deception may make individuals suspicious about research and psychology. Deception (continued) • Deception is justified only – when the study is very important, – no other methods for conducting research are available, and – deception would not influence individuals’ decision to participate in the research. • When deception is used, the researcher must – Inform participants after the experiment the reasons for the deception, – discuss any misconceptions they may have, and – remove any harmful effects of the deception. • This is called debriefing. Research with Animals
• Should animals be used in research?
– The answer to this question is fiercely debated. • APA Ethical Standards and IACUCs: – The researcher who uses animal subjects is ethically obligated to look out for their welfare and to treat them humanely. – Any pain, discomfort, or death must be justified by the potential scientific, educational, or applied goals. Reporting Psychological Research • Publication credit: – acknowledge fairly those who have contributed to a research project. – authorship should be based on the scholarly importance of individuals’ contributions. • Plagiarism Don’t present substantial portions or elements of another’s work as your own. – Ignorance and sloppiness are not legitimate excuses. – Cite the sources of your ideas when you use the exact words (with quotation marks and page number) and when you paraphrase. – Examples Steps for Ethical Decision Making • Permission from authors to use scales in your research. • Permission from host institution • Permission from guest institution • Written informed consent • Find out all the facts of the situation (procedure, who will participate, etc.) • Identify the ethical issues that are relevant (e.g., risk, informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, deception, debriefing). • Decide what is at stake for all parties involved (e.g., participants, researchers, institutions, society). • Identify alternative methods or procedures