Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Managing Requirements and Engagements For The Canadian Workforce
Managing Requirements and Engagements For The Canadian Workforce
Managing Requirements and Engagements For The Canadian Workforce
PEL faced financial strain, employee resistance to change, budget constraints, and
increased employee turnover during the ERP implementation process.
The journey of PELs transition, to ERP serves as an example for companies who are
thinking about making changes. It provides lessons, on the challenges faced when
moving from systems to new and improved ERP solutions.
INTRODUCTION
Pakistan Electron Limited (PEL) is a leading manufacturer of electrical goods in
Pakistan. It was established in 1956 through specialized collaboration with M/ s AEG
of Germany.
We will specifically look at the difficulties and issues PEL encountered during the
process of moving its systems to an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) effect, all the
while maintaining its dedication to quality, invention, and its valued pool.
This case study provides perceptive information about the dynamics of change and
adaptation in the face of request demands that are constantly changing and
technological advancements.
INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
To conduct an industrial analysis of Pak Electron, we have used various frameworks and
tools, such as PESTEL analysis, Porter's Five Forces, and financial analysis.
PESTEL ANALYSIS
• Political Factors
• Economical Factors
• Sociocultural Factors
• Technological Factors
• Environmental Factors
• Legal Factors
INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES
The company did not have a clear vision and strategy for the ERP project and did not
involve all the stakeholders and users in the planning and design stages.
The company did not allocate enough resources and time for the ERP project and
underestimated the complexity and scope of the implementation
The company did not manage the change management and training aspects of the ERP
project effectively and faced resistance and dissatisfaction from the staff who were
reluctant to adopt the new system.
The company did not ensure the quality and accuracy of the data being entered and
migrated to the new system and relied on manual reconciliations and adjustments to
generate reports.
The company did not have a strong partnership with the consulting firm that was
hired to implement the ERP project and terminated their contract prematurely due to
cost and performance issues.