Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Underlap Double Gate Mosfet1234
Underlap Double Gate Mosfet1234
AS BIOSENSOR
Ajay, Rakhi Analytical Model of Gate Underlap In this paper, a gate underlap Dielectric Modulated(DM) Double
Double Gate Junctionless MOSFET Gate (DG) Junctionless (JL) Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-
Narang, as a Bio-Sensor Effect Transistor (MOSFET) has been investigated through
Manoj exhaustive device simulation for the label free electrical detection
Saxena, and of the biomolecules. The shift in the threshold voltage has been
Mridula considered as the sensing parameter of the device to detect the
presence of biomolecules when they are immobilized in the gate
Gupta underlap channel region.
Elvis C. Sun A Compact Threshold Voltage Model This paper reports an analysis of gate misalignment effect
for Gate Misalignment Effect of DG on the threshold voltage of double-gate nMOS devices
and James B. FD SOI nMOS Devices Considering
Kuo, Fellow, using a compact model considering the fringing electric
Fringing Electric Field Effects
field effect, biased at zero-bias . Using the conformal
IEEE
mapping transformation approach
LITERATURE SURVEY
AUTHOR TITLE DESCRIPTION
NAME
Chi-Woo Lee, High-Temperature This paper investigates the temperature dependence of
Adrien Borne, Performance of Silicon the main electrical parameters of junctionless (JL)
Isabelle Junctionless MOSFETs silicon nanowire transistors. Direct comparison is made
Ferain, Aryan
to silicon nanowire (trigate) MOSFETs. Variation of
Afzalian,
Member, parameters such as threshold voltage and ON–OFF
IEEE, Ran current characteristics is analyzed.
Yan, Nima The JL silicon nanowire FET has a lager variation of
Dehdashti threshold voltage with temperature than the standard
Akhavan, inversion- and accumulation- mode FETs. Unlike in
Pedram classical devices, the drain current
Razavi, and of JL FETs increases when temperature is increased.
Jean-Pierre
Colinge,
Fellow, IEEE
MOTIVATION
REDUCED SHORT CHANNEL EFFECTS DUE TO SCALING
HIGH SENSITIVITY
Chart Title
0.115
0.1145
0.114
THRESHOLD VOLTAGE
0.1135
0.113
0.1125
0.112
0.1115
0.111
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DIELECTRIC CONSTANT
(K)
SENSTIVITY VERSUS DIELECTRIC CONSTANT
2.07
2.06
2.05
2.04
2.03
2.02
2.01
2
2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
DETECTION OF CHARGED BIOMOLECULE
OBSERVATION TABLE FOR CHARGED BIOMOLECULE
CHARGE CONCENTRATION CHANGE IN THRESHOLD SUBTHRESHOLD SWING
(Q×1015 m-2 ) VOLTAGE (mv/decade)
(milliVolts)
-7 0.12 103.153
-5 0.14 103.141
-3 0.13 103.048
-1 0.15 103.193
103.193
0 0
103.193
1 -0.70
103.193
3 -0.22
103.193
5 -0.38
103.193
7 -0.53
VARIATION IN ION CURRENT VERSUS GATE VOLTAGE
THRESHOLD VOLATGE VERSUS CHARGE ON BIOMOLECULE
0.8
0.7
0.6
Threshold Voltage
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
70
60
50
SENSITIVITY ( %)
40
30
20
10
0
-1 5 -1 0 -5 0 5 10 15