This document discusses guidelines for antibiotic use in abdominal surgery and infections. It covers principles of surgical site infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis. It provides recommendations for antibiotic selection and protocols in biliary procedures, acute appendicitis, acute pancreatitis, and abdominal sepsis. The key goals are to prevent infections by reducing bacterial load during surgery and appropriately treat established infections.
This document discusses guidelines for antibiotic use in abdominal surgery and infections. It covers principles of surgical site infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis. It provides recommendations for antibiotic selection and protocols in biliary procedures, acute appendicitis, acute pancreatitis, and abdominal sepsis. The key goals are to prevent infections by reducing bacterial load during surgery and appropriately treat established infections.
This document discusses guidelines for antibiotic use in abdominal surgery and infections. It covers principles of surgical site infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis. It provides recommendations for antibiotic selection and protocols in biliary procedures, acute appendicitis, acute pancreatitis, and abdominal sepsis. The key goals are to prevent infections by reducing bacterial load during surgery and appropriately treat established infections.
Dr. Ritesh Karwaria GUIDELINES AND PRACTICES INTRODUCTION Surgical Site infection is the most common healthcare associated infection among hospitalised patients and the most common nosocomial infection in surgical wards. SSI Rates considerably increase when surgery is performed on GI Tract ~30% compared to other general surgical procedures. The reason for higher rate of SSI is that the GI Tract harbors a high load of bacteria including anaerobic organisms from gut mucosa SSI can be prevented by optimizing patients in peri-operative period with appropriate glycemic control, maintenance of normothermia, perioperative supplemental Oxygen. Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis is also an effective way to reduce SSI. GENERAL PRINCIPLES Majority of the operative procedures in the GI tract falls into clean contaminated and contaminated wound class according to CDC Classification, hence rate of SSI is higher and requires antibiotics. In addition to the gram positive skin flora (Streptrococcal species, Staphylococcus Aureus, CONS), gram negative rods and Enterococci are frequently isolated from SSI after GI Surgery. The goal of antimicrobial prophylaxis is to prevent SSI by reducing burden of micro- organisms at surgical site during operative procedure. The following considerations are to be taken while giving antimicrobial prophylaxis: - Appropriate Antibiotic Selection - Second line Prophylaxis - Adequate dosing and redosing - Route of administration - Optimum timing of antibiotic administration - Duration of Antimicrobial prophylaxis ANTIBIOTIC FOR BILIARY PROCEDURES 1. Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (0-4% ) Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for symptomatic gall stone disease and is the most commonly performed minimally invasive procedure in elective setting. Traditionally one dose of prophylactic antibiotic was given to all patients undergoing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Prophylaxis is generally recommended only for high risk patients which include age more than 70 years, ASA Grade >=3, Pregnancy, Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity, Non functioning Gall bladder, and immunosuppression. Commonly isolated organisms from SSI of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy include gram negative bacilli ; E Coli, Klebsiella and Enterococci. 2. Other Biliary procedures Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended in patients undergoing ERCP (Both therapeutic or diagnostic) Exception: If patient has features of Cholangitis or Obstructive Jaundice.
Open Cholecystectomy,Bile duct surgeries, Biliary-enteric Anastamoses (1-9%)
Commonly isolated organisms from SSI of Open surgeries include gram negative bacilli ; E Coli, Klebsiella and Enterococci. Ocassionaly Clostridium species have been isolated Less commonly, Skin commensals have been isolated from the postoperative SSI 3. Acute Cholecystitis Acute Cholecystitis is associated with presence of biliary infections with significant physiological derangement. Considering the presence of infection and probability of progression to Severe septic complications in untreated patients, Biliary tract infections are treated as per guidelines for complicated intra-abdominal infections
*TOKYO GUIDELINES 2018
Divides Patients into 3 groups Grade I: Mild Grade II : Moderate Grade III : Severe Commonly Isolated Organisms : Predominantly Enteric Gram Negative Organisms ; Less commonly Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter
Severe Cholecystitis patients in addition to antibiotics require fluid resuscitation,
source control by drainage/surgery and management of organ dysfunction. ANTIBIOTICS FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS Acute Appendicitis is the most common emergency for which operation is performed and appendectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for both simple and complicated appendicitis. Common Organisms isolated from Appendectomy wound infections include Anaerobic and Aerobic gram negative organisms. Among the anaerobes Bacteriodes Fragilis is most commonly cultured from the wound. E Coli is the most commonly isolated aerobe. Less Frequent: Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus Rate of SSI upto 30% Laparoscopic appendectomy has been shown to have low postoperative wound complications in terms of superficial and deep SSI compared to open appendectomy. Considering the mixed aerobic and anaerobic spectrum of bacteria implicated in appendectomy wound infection, monotherapy using second generation cephalosporin with anaerobic activity or a first-generation cephalosporin in combination with metronidazole is considered a reasonable choice. Third generation Cephalosporin with partial anaerobic activity have been shown to reduce SSI Rates to less than 5 % ACUTE PANCREATITIS Acute pancreatitis is a common abdominal emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality primarily due to septic complications. While majority of patients have mild self-limiting acute pancreatitis, a small proportion develop severe acute pancreatitis. Early phase (first 2 weeks) of severe pancreatitis is characterized by early systemic inflammatory response syndrome with or without multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Approximately one-fifth of patients develop secondary bacterial infection and septic complications that usually occurs 2-3 weeks after the onset of pancreatitis. Pathogenesis of Infection in Acute Pancreatitis
The routes of infection in acute pancreatitis are:
Bacterial translocation from the gut to the portal system and systemic circulation due to impaired gut mucosal defense mechanism. From the biliary system especially in patients with biliary pancreatitis secondary to stones in the biliary tract Ascending infection from the duodenum through the ampulla and pancreatic duct. • Infection from the colon due to bacterial translocation through lymphatics Implication of Gut organisms as the primary source of infection is supported by the commonly isolated organisms in infected pancreatic necrosis are Gram Negative Bacteria ( E.Coli, Klebsiella) normally seen in Intestinal lumen. Gram positive bacteria ( Enterococcus, Staphylococcus Aureus), anaerobes and fungi have also been implicated as a source of infection in approximately 20-30% cases with acute pancreatitis. ROLE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS The use of antibiotics to prevent infection is still controversial; many authors have advocated their routine use while others decry it. The proponents of prophylactic antibiotics suggest that close to 50% of patients with severe acute pancreatitis develop infection and it contributes to mortality in three- fourths of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Various studies have concluded that antibiotics for 10-14 days in acute pancreatitis have shown decreased superinfection of pancreatic tissue and its associated mortality. THERAPEUTIC ANTIBIOTICS FOR INFECTED PANCREATIC NECROSIS Unlike sterile pancreatic necrosis there is no controversy in the role of antibiotics for infected acute pancreatitis. However, definite diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis remains a challenge as systemic inflammatory response seen in patients with severe pancreatitis often mimics infection. The investigation of choice to document infection is CT-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from the area of pancreatic necrosis as it will also guide management by selecting appropriate antibiotics. However, it is an invasive procedure and is associated with high false negative results. Presence of gas within the necrotic areas on cross sectional imaging also signifies infection. Hence , Serum markers are commonly are used to determine infection. ( CRP and WBC Count are highly sensitive)
In cases of pancreatic necrosis, antibiotics known to penetrate necrosis should be
used. Aminoglycosides have poor penetration Ureidopencillins and 3rd Generation cephalosporins have intermediate penetration Quinolones and Carbapenems have good penetration. In view of widespread resistance to quinolones, carbapenems remain the antibiotic of choice for critically ill patients with infected pancreatic necrosis. In addition their activity against commonly implicated gram negative organisms they are also effective against anaerobes. Of the antibiotics with intermediate penetration, piperacillin/tazobactam is effective against bacteria and anaerobes in addition to its efficacy against gram-positive bacteria and anaerobes and may be the initial empiric antibiotic in patients with acute pancreatitis. Probiotics are no longer recommended in acute pancreatitis. No role of prophylactic antifungal in acute pancreatitis. However, infection with Candida species is common in patients receiving antibiotics and treatment with Azoles (Caspofungin) for a minimum duration of 2 weeks is recommended. ABDOMINAL SEPSIS As per the third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) published in February 2016, sepsis is defined as “life threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is used to objectively determine organ dysfunction. An increase in the sepsis related SOFA score by >2 points is considered life threatening. As per current recommendations , abdominal sepsis is defined as increase in SOFA score >= 2 due to abdominal infections PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT The principles of management in patients with abdominal sepsis are: -Early Diagnosis -Source control in form of debridement -Removal of infected devices, drainage of purulent cavities and decompression of abdominal cavity. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines for antimicrobial therapy in patients with abdominal sepsis are: -Early administration of parenteral antibiotics within 1 hour after admission -Choice of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy before the availability of culture and antibiotic susceptibility results should be based on potential causative organisms, local trend of antibiotic resistance, patient risk factors, severity and source of infection -Once the culture and antibiotic susceptibility results are available theantibiotic spectrum should be narrowed - De-escalation or withdrawal of antimicrobial therapy should be considered as soon as possible based on multidisciplinary, daily reevaluation of the critically ill patient. The aim of these guidelines is to prevent the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria and superinfection with fungal pathogens. ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY FOR ABDOMINAL SEPSIS SEPSIS Diagnosis Antibiotic regimen-Low risk Antibiotic regimen-High risk Secondary peritonitis Piperacillin +Tazobactam Imipenem-Cilastatin Cefoperazone+ Sulbactam Ceftolozane + Meropenem tazobactam + metronidazole Ceftazidime+ avibactam+ metronidazole Moxifloxacin Levofloxacin/ ciprofloxacin + metronidazole
Cefoperazone+ Sulbactam Imipenem+ Cilastatin Meropenem Tertiary peritonitis Imipenem+ Cilastatin (+linezolid) Meropenem (+linezolid) Ceftolozane+ tazobactam + metronidazole(+linezolid) Ceftazidime + avibactam- metronidazole(+linezolid) Tigecycline DURATION OF THERAPY In patients with abdominal sepsis, traditionally antibiotics are to be given for a minimum period of 1 week. However, in patients not severely ill and in which adequate source control has been achieved, short course therapy is equally effective. Use of antibiotics for short duration minimizes drug-related adverse events, avoids selection of antibiotic resistance, and significantly reduces health care costs. However, in patients with staphylococcus septicemia (positive blood culture) antibiotics should be given for two (uncomplicated infection) to four (complicated infection) weeks. In the presence of on-going abdominal sepsis, the duration of antibiotics should be based on the clinical assessment Serum markers of sepsis such as procalcitonin can guide in the determination of duration of antimicrobial therapy COLORECTAL SURGERY Surgical site infection is the most common cause of postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal diseases. While the advent of minimally invasive surgery has reduced the morbidity related to SSI, SSIs still remain a common postoperative complication in approximately 25% of patients. EVOLUTION OF ANTIBIOTICS IN COLORECTAL SURGERY Postoperative SSIs have been attributed to fecal flora so initially the aim was to reduce fecal flora and mitigate infectious complications by reducing fecal load.
Mid 20th century: Mechanical bowel Prepration
End of 20th Century : Shift to micriobiological prepration: Oral antibiotics + MBP (Oral Neomycin(1g) + Oral Erythromycin(1g) 17-18 hours before surgery) Early 21st Century: Advent of Parenteral Antibiotics with better bioavailability : shift to parenteral antibiotics prophylaxis Current evidence shows the combination of mechanical with microbiological prepration with parenteral antibiotics, oral antibiotics and MBP should be done for elective colorectal surgery ( especially left colon and rectal surgery) ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS FOR ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Elective Colorectal Surgery There is level 1 evidence for intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis administered within 60 min before incision. The currently recommended regimen is second or third generation cephalosporin combined with metronidazole to cover both gram-negative acrobes and anaerobes. Additional intraoperative or postoperative doses are not recommended when the antibiotics are given for prophylaxis in the elective setting as it increases the risk of C difficile colitis Oral antibiotics are recommended in patients receiving MBP, although the evidence is not as satisfactory as with parenteral antibiotics No clear consensus regarding the dosage and duration is present. The choice of antibiotic regimen is based on surgeon’s choice, institutional antibiotic protocol and local antibiotic resistance. ANTIBIOTICS FOR EMERGENCY COLORECTAL SURGERY Emergency surgery is usually performed for obstruction or perforation is patients presenting with obstruction without signs of systemic sepsis, the parenteral antibiotic regimen is similar to prophylactic antibiotics given for elective surgery. Oral antibiotics have limited role as MBP is not given in emergency patients. Recommendations are similar to that of Abdominal Sepsis. INTESTINAL ISCHEMIA Intestinal ischemia is a life-threatening complication secondary to abrupt interruption of the vascular supply to a segment of bowel. Globally, the incidence of intestinal ischemia is increasing due to the increase in an aging population. Broadly, intestinal ischemia is classified as occlusive or nonocclusive types. Occlusive type of intestinal ischemia could be due to arterial embolism, arterial thrombosis, or venous thrombosis. Irrespective of the etiology the manifestations of intestinal ischemia are dependent on the duration and severity of vascular occlusion Microscopic changes of ischemia can be detected in the intestinal mucosa within minutes of vascular occlusion. Ischemic damage to mucosa affects intestinal barrier resulting in bacterial translocation. Studies have shown that bacteria translocate through the intercellular route between the intestinal epithelial cells or through ulcerations left by denuded epithelial cells in patients with ischemic damage Antibiotic use is based on broad spectrum anti microbial coverage, similar to Abdominal sepsis. THANK YOU