Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Madhyamaka
Madhyamaka
Madhyamaka
Subject:
Thoughts of Prajna and Madhyamaka in
India
Lecturer:
Ven. Dr. Chang Qing
Class:
EN/BA 2020
Topic:
Nagarjuna’s emptiness teaching from the
perspective of critics.
Presented By:
Sheng Fa
En/BA/2020
Content
Introduction
Charge of nihilism
Accusation as a sceptic
Non- conceptuality
Conclusion
Introduction
Indian Philosophy
Hinduism date back to ancient times
Vedas - around 1500–1200 BCE
Upanishads - around 800–200 BCE
Buddhist Philosophy
Emerged in the 6th century BCE
with the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama,
Over time, different Buddhist schools and traditions
developed, each interpreting and elaborating on these
foundational principles in distinct ways.
Emptyness
Yogacara philosophy Śūnyavāda
posits a form of Niḥsvabhāvavāda
Yogācara school idealism in which
external objects are
considered to be
projections of the mind All phenomena (dharmas)
(vijnapti-mātra). are empty (śūnya) of "nature" of any
"substance" or "essence" (svabhāva)
which could give them "solid and
independent existence", because they
Abhidharmikas Constituents (dharmas) are dependently
Pāli have their own co-arisen.
Sarvastivāda intrinsic nature. Madhyamaka only negates things
Sautantrika (svabhāva) conventionally,
since ultimately, there is nothing there to
negate.
Madhyamaka explanation of inherent nature
Ultimate emptiness
Śūnyatā - Emptiness
Intrinsicality Voidness
Essentialism Nihilism
Existence non-existence
Presence absence
Accusation as a sceptic
Nāgārjuna famously claims to hold no view, and further, that those who
hold sunyata as a view are incurable - Vigrahavyāvartanī .
Catuskoti - The Tetralemma When asked, for example, whether the world
has a beginning or not,
1. Affirmation (Positive Assertion) “No, the world does not have a beginning, it
2. Negation (Negative Assertion) does not fail to have a beginning, it does not
3. Both Affirmation and Negation have and not have a beginning, nor does it
4. Neither Affirmation nor Negation neither have nor not have a beginning.”
Accusation as a sceptic
What is the Buddha’s
standpoint? This is how right view is defined. Two brahmins, Bharadvaja
Used a simile of a
‘All exists’: this is one extreme. and Vasettha, who left
mortally wounded ‘All does not exist’: this is the their family and vanna to
soldier on a battlefield second extreme. become monks raised
who is dying. Avoiding these two extremes, ontological questions and
the Realized One teaches by the the Buddha denied to
middle way. answer.
Emptiness
Nāgārjuna claims that nothing has an essential nature (svabhāva)as he makes such claims,
according to Burton, he cannot be called a sceptic.
-David F. Burton. Emptiness Appraised
Conclusion
Images:
● https://pngtree.com/
● https://pixabay.com/
● https://hicliart.com/
● https://images.google.com/
Buddhism Icon Pack