Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Earned Value & Critical Chain
Earned Value & Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
I only hope it is cast, not as EVM vs. CCPMbut as how to improve PM using the best tools for the project. Wayne Abba
EVMS
Agenda
Critical Chain
Review of progress to date Answering the Challenges Quick Review of CCPM and EVMS Processes Issues and Recommendations
Contractor Implementation
Baselining Metrics
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Status
Solicited volunteers for working level team
current e-mail roster
28 experts 4 major defense companies CCPM and EVMS experts
Critical Chain
Co-Leaders
Gregg Tiemann, Boeing Eleanor Haupt, USAF, Wright-Patterson AFB
EVMS
Critical Chain
Purpose of Team
Explore, develop, and recommend methods to integrate critical chain scheduling and EVMS in a complex project environment Proposed methodology will be presented and discussed in workshops
ASC/Industry Cost and Schedule Workshop (Apr 5-7) College of Performance Management Conference (May 1517, Clearwater Beach FL, www.cpm-pmi.org)
NAME
COMPANY Robbins-Gioia Tecolote Research AFMC, WPAFB OH USAF, WPAFB AFFTC, Edwards AFB
EVMS
Bowman, Tom Cathcart, Bob Collins, Judy Crowell, Jimmie Francis, Ken
Critical Chain
Haupt, Eleanor Kessler, Lee Marshall, Janet Marshall, Ray Peterson, Craig Roberts, Dave Smith, Becky Tiemann, Gregg Troop, Dick Udell, Ellen
USAF, WPAFB Boeing USAF, WPAFB Boeing EDS Boeing Northrop Grumman Boeing C/S Solutions DSD Labs (SAF/AQX)
Vander Wissel, PattyRobbins-Gioia Wachs, Steve Wentworth, Janet Williams, Ken Northrop Grumman USAF, WPAFB Northrop Grumman, ISA
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Tell me how you will measure me and I will tell you how I will behave; if you choose to measure me illogically, do not be surprised by illogical behavior. Eli Goldratt EVMS forces focus on local optima (task completion) instead of the global optima (project completion) EVMS fosters starting tasks early to earn value and results in bad multitasking. You are absolutly right. Using Earned Value in managing and controling a project is devostating as I've repeatedly proved in Critical Chain. Eli
EVMS
Critical Chain
Resolutions
Resolved
The purpose of critical chain scheduling is to achieve breakthrough success, reduce cycle time of projects, and ultimately reduce cost. The purpose of EVMS is the same, and in fact, EVMS baselines should be based on well planned, achievable schedules.
We recognize that...
- CC and EVMS are not mutually exclusive; - that EVMS application is flexible enough to integrate with CC without driving additional reporting requirements
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Program Buffer
Normal Schedule, at around 90% probability for task durations
EVMS
Critical Chain
Task A
Task B
Task C
RB RB
Task G
Task J
Program Buffer
Task H
Task I
FB
Due Date
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS Baselining
Lay out tasks Network the tasks
perform forward pass to establish early finish dates perform backward pass, establish late finish dates to meet milestones critical path established
Networked schedule (with milestone dates) used as basis for resource allocation
Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS)
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baseline Panel
Potential Issues
sizing of buffers assign $ to buffers? is 50% the right probability? use of milestones change process/control initial program duration
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
Recommendations:
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
pro:
Recommendations:
alternative one
may allocate management reserve to some lower level to protect buffers would not have: work scope, WBS identity, or phasing
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
Recommendations:
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
Recommendations:
government may need to find alternate way to assess progress and make payments government should establish OSD goals on more conservative schedule (e.g., 90%) or, possible to insert buffers before milestone dates or, phase program buffers before major milestones and treat as mini projects
e.g., activity from award to CDR is a mini project, with project buffer
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
Recommendations:
contractors should establish rules for use of schedule buffers contractors may wish to establish more flexibility in approving management reserve e.g., allocate MR to IPT leads, with authority to approve at IPT level
EVMS
Critical Chain
Baselining
Recommendations:
outside the purview of this group continue acquisition reform efforts to minimize schedule risk during initial program planning (before release of RFP) on complex DoD programs, perform Monte Carlo simulation to determine probability of success BEFORE cutting duration times
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics Panel
Potential Issues
Ignore SPI? What are the appropriate metrics? Create a new index? Change variance reporting? Impacts to EAC predictions need demonstration projects drill down into detail problem areas
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
use SPI to drill down to problem areas select alternate metrics to establish variance reporting (see other charts)
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
Focus on analyzing schedule variances through buffer consumption Program manager should establish simple tiered warning system, e.g.,
0 - 33% buffer consumed 34 - 66% buffer consumed 67 - 100% buffer consumed green (okay) yellow (watch & plan) red (act)
EVMS
Critical Chain
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
25
50
75
100
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
Buffer Performance Index (BPI) = BPI of 1 or greater is good % complete % buffer consumed
Others?
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
contractor defined significant variances eliminate reporting on traditional schedule variances report on buffer consumption need to evaluate potential for additional cost variances to occur
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
use new index (BPI?) in place of SPI in EAC formulas, e.g., EAC = ACWP + (BAC - BCWP) (CPI*BPI)
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
conduct smaller scale demo projects track alternate metrics analyze final results vs. metrics analyze organizational behavior in relation to metrics - what drove behavior? recommend best metrics for future projects dont implement policy until we have a few demo projects completed
EVMS
Critical Chain
Metrics
Recommendations:
provide drill down to the detail necessary to understand cost and performance
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government Panel
Potential Issues
Status reporting impacts to FPRA business base Paying subcontractors Funding profiles Incorporation into IBR process Leveraging larger MR for out-of scope changes
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Recommendations:
seek OSD approval to report alternate metrics avoid use of SPI in EAC calculations
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Recommendations:
Continue process of baselining rates at beginning of program and updating yearly to new forecast. May wish to allocate MR to protect potential difference in rates Educate DCMC at next quarterly DCMC earned value conference
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Issue: Timing of payment to subcontractors if they are on time, but prime is not
Discussion:
What happens when a subcontractor delivers on time to the 50% probable schedule, but the primes performance has slipped, resulting in material sitting on dock prior to actual need date? Will government allow payment to subcontractor in advance of revised need date?
Recommendations:
Get DCMC/DCAA buy-in to allow payment for on-time delivery Educate administrative contracting officers
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Recommendations:
Program office should attempt to build funding profile to CCPM schedule Seek approval to treat development money as 2 year money (which it is) for flexibility Establish contingent liabilities as needed
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Issue: How do we incorporate this into the Integrated Baseline Review process?
Discussion:
How do we revise the IBR process? How do we perform a more global look at constraining resources? How do we evaluate a 50% probable schedule?
Recommendations:
Alternatives Joint IPT participation in baseline development, (not a single point review) Phased IBR (work scope, then schedule, then budget) Phased IBR (global and top level assessments, then look at control accounts)
EVMS
Critical Chain
Government
Issue: Temptation to use Management Reserve (if much larger) for subsequent contract changes
Discussion:
If not educated on CCPM, program office could lean on contractors to use large pot of MR for future changes
Recommendations:
Education is key May wish to allocate and identify MR based on 90% schedule
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Recommendations:
EVMS
Critical Chain
Recommendations:
EVMS
Critical Chain
Recommendations:
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
Benefits
EVMS
Critical Chain
Better focus on enterprise resources during IBR Better tailoring of metrics (e.g. focus on buffer consumption vs. strict thresholds)
Time saving
CC forcing re-examination of tools that have been around but ignored or not adequately utilized
Results in better project management
EVMS
Critical Chain
Youre under suspicion for violation of EVMIG 2.3 sub para 2a, questions 139 and 152
EVMS
Critical Chain
2.5 Any buffer should have a unique WBS & organization ID (e.g.: program buffer may be assigned to the Program Mgr) 2.6 Should only have ONE schedule 2.7 Recommend insertion of buffers before key milestones (e.g. design reviews) IF there is a contractually required date 2.8 Recognized: DoD awards contracts with aggressive schedules (RFP requirement or competitive environment) 2.12 LOE effort for time period of program buffer may be placed in management reserve at lower levels (e.g. at level of CAM for LOE activities)
Note: number refers to criteria contained in Earned Value Management Implementation Guide, Chapter 2, Criteria.
EVMS
Critical Chain
EVMS
Critical Chain
CONCLUSION:
No current problems seen implementing CCPM on a program that requires compliance with EV criteria
EVMS
Critical Chain