Employee

Performance
and
Evaluation
Introduction
Employee Performance and Evaluation refers to the process of assessing an employee's job
performance, productivity, and overall contribution to the organization. Evaluating employee
performance helps organizations identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement, which are
essential for making informed decisions regarding promotions, rewards, training, and development
opportunities. It includes performance appraisal methods, performance management systems, and the
importance of regular, fair, and effective evaluations.
What is Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal, also known as performance evaluation or performance review, is a
systematic process used by organizations to assess and evaluate the performance of their employees. It
involves gathering and analyzing information about an employee's job-related behaviors, skills,
competencies, and outcomes in order to provide objective feedback.
Main Purpose of Performance
Appraisal
The main purpose of performance appraisal is to measure and assess an employee's job performance
against established criteria and standards. This assessment helps managers and organizations make
informed decisions regarding employee development, compensation, promotions, and terminations. By
providing feedback on strengths and areas for improvement, performance appraisal contributes to
enhancing employee performance and overall organizational effectiveness.
Benefits of Performance Appraisal
1. Feedback and goal-setting: Performance appraisal provides employees with feedback on their performance,
helps them understand their strengths and areas for improvement, and sets future goals and development plans.

2. Recognition and rewards: Performance appraisal helps in identifying high-performing employees who can
be rewarded and recognized for their contributions to the organization.

3. Performance improvement: By highlighting areas for improvement, performance appraisal allows

employees to address their weaknesses and enhance their skills and knowledge.

4. Communication and alignment: Performance appraisal facilitates communication between employees and
managers, helping to align individual objectives with organizational goals and objectives.

5. Decision-making: Performance appraisal serves as a basis for making decisions related to employee
promotions, compensation adjustments, training and development needs, and career planning.
 Performance Determinants and
Obstacles
Factors Influencing Employee Performance:
Skills and Abilities: One of the primary determinants of employee performance is their skills and abilities. Employees who possess the
necessary knowledge, expertise, and competencies related to their job roles are more likely to perform well. Skills can be acquired
through education, training programs, and on-the-job experience. Having the right skill set enables employees to effectively handle tasks,
make informed decisions, and contribute to overall organizational success.

Motivation and Engagement: The level of motivation and engagement a person has in their work significantly impacts their
performance. Motivated and engaged employees are more likely to be proactive, take initiative, and display high levels of effort and
dedication toward their work. Motivation can be fostered through various means, including creating a positive work environment,
providing recognition and rewards for good performance, facilitating career growth opportunities, and fostering a sense of purpose and
meaning in employees' work.

Work Environment and Culture: The work environment and organizational culture also play a crucial role in shaping employee
performance. A supportive work environment that encourages collaboration, open communication, and teamwork can enhance
performance. Additionally, a positive and inclusive organizational culture that values employee well-being, diversity, and work-life
balance can contribute to higher levels of job satisfaction and performance.
 Performance Determinants and
Obstacles
Potential Obstacles to Performance:
Lack of Clarity in Job Expectations: When employees are unclear about their job roles, responsibilities, and performance expectations,
it can hinder their performance. Lack of clarity can lead to ambiguity, confusion, and a lack of focus. Employers should provide clear and
well-defined job descriptions, communicate performance expectations effectively, and provide employees with the necessary resources
and support to meet those expectations.
Insufficient Resources or Support: Employees may encounter obstacles in their performance if they lack the necessary resources, tools,
and support to accomplish their tasks. Insufficient resources can include inadequate training, limited access to information, outdated
technology, or insufficient staffing levels. Employers should ensure that employees have the necessary resources available to perform
their jobs effectively and provide support when needed.
Poor Communication and Feedback: Effective communication and regular feedback are crucial for maintaining high performance
levels. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and decreased productivity. Employees need clear communication
from their supervisors regarding expectations, goals, and changes within the organization. Additionally, regular feedback and
performance evaluations provide employees with valuable insights to improve their performance and address any areas of concern.
Importance of Performance
Appraisal
Performance appraisal is a process in organizations that evaluates
and assesses the individual performance of employees. It not only
measures their achievements and shortcomings but also provides
valuable feedback to enhance future performance and helps align
organizational goals with individual objectives.
Significance of Performance
Appraisal
1. Identifies areas for improvement and development: Performance appraisals offer an opportunity for
managers to identify strengths and weaknesses in employee performance. It helps in recognizing areas where
improvement is required, whether it be behavioral, technical, or skill-based. By pinpointing these areas,
organizations can provide specific training and development programs to enhance employee skills and
knowledge.

2. Drives employee motivation and engagement: Regular performance evaluations show employees that
their contributions are valued and recognized. The feedback received during appraisal discussions can be
utilized to acknowledge achievements and provide constructive criticism. This, in turn, fosters a sense of
motivation and engagement among employees, as they feel their efforts are noticed and appreciated.
Moreover, performance appraisals can also help in identifying high performers, allowing organizations to
reward and incentivize them accordingly, further boosting motivation.
Significance of Performance
Appraisal
3. Facilitates goal alignment and performance expectations: A performance appraisal system ensures that
employees are well aware of the organization's expectations, targets, and goals. This alignment of individual
goals with organizational objectives is vital for maintaining focus and direction within the workforce. By
setting clear performance expectations during the appraisal process, employees become more conscious of
what is expected of them, enabling them to work towards achieving those goals.

4. Supports fair and objective decision-making processes: Performance appraisals provide a structured
framework for evaluating employees, which helps in making fair and objective decisions related to
promotions, salary increments, and performance-related rewards. By assessing individual performance using
standardized criteria, organizations can minimize bias and favoritism, ensuring that decisions are based on
merit and performance rather than personal preferences.
Uses of Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal is a tool used by organizations to evaluate the performance
of their employees and provide feedback on their achievements and areas of
improvement. It serves as a key component in various aspects of human resource
management.
Main Uses of Performance
Appraisal
1. Compensation and rewards decisions: Performance appraisal helps organizations determine
the compensation and rewards given to employees based on their performance. By assessing
individual performance, organizations can link pay and incentives with employee contributions,
thereby motivating and retaining top performers.

2. Promotion and career development opportunities: Performance appraisal allows

organizations to identify high-potential employees who can be considered for promotions or
career advancement opportunities. Through a comprehensive evaluation of performance,
potential, and skills, managers can identify and groom individuals for future leadership roles.

3. Training and skill enhancement initiatives: Performance appraisal helps identify the specific
training and development needs of employees. By assessing their strengths and weaknesses,
organizations can design targeted training programs to enhance employee skills and bridge any
skill gaps that may exist.
Main Uses of Performance
Appraisal
4. Employee feedback and coaching: Performance appraisal provides a platform for managers to
provide constructive feedback to employees regarding their performance, behavior, and areas for
improvement. Regular feedback and coaching sessions help employees understand their strengths
and weaknesses and take appropriate actions to enhance their performance.

5. Succession planning and talent management: Performance appraisal assists organizations in

identifying individuals with potential to fill key positions in the future. By evaluating employee
performance, competencies, and potential, organizations can develop succession plans and talent
management strategies to ensure a stable flow of capable leaders.
Process of Performance Appraisal
The performance appraisal process is a systematic evaluation of an employee's
job performance and contribution to the organization. It typically involves a series
of steps that allow managers or supervisors to assess an employee's progress,
provide feedback, and discuss areas of improvement.
Steps involved in the Performance
Appraisal Process
1. Goal setting and performance expectations: The appraisal process begins with setting clear goals and
performance expectations for each employee. This involves defining specific objectives, targets, key
performance indicators (KPIs), and desired outcomes that align with the organization's strategic goals.

2. Ongoing performance monitoring and feedback: Throughout the evaluation period, supervisors should
actively monitor and provide regular feedback to employees. This can be done through informal
conversations, weekly check-ins, or periodic reviews. Timely and constructive feedback helps employees
understand their strengths and areas for improvement.

3. Formal appraisal meetings or reviews: At the end of the performance evaluation period, formal
appraisal meetings or reviews are conducted. These meetings typically involve a discussion between the
employee and the supervisor to review and evaluate the employee's performance against the set goals and
expectations.
Steps involved in the Performance
Appraisal Process
4. Performance rating and documentation: Following the appraisal meeting, the supervisor assigns a
performance rating to the employee based on their overall performance during the evaluation period. The
rating can be numerical (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 5) or descriptive (e.g., exceeds expectations, meets
expectations, needs improvement). The appraisal process also involves documenting the employee's
achievements, areas of improvement, and any important discussions that took place during the review.

5. Performance improvement planning: If an employee's performance does not meet expectations, a

performance improvement plan may be created. This involves outlining specific areas for improvement,
setting new goals and targets, and establishing a timeline for progress. Regular check-ins and feedback are
provided to support the employee in achieving the desired performance level.
Methods of Performance Appraisal
1. Graphic Rating Scales: This method involves assessing an employee's performance against predefined
criteria or a scale. The criteria may include factors such as quality of work, productivity, communication
skills, teamwork, and problem-solving abilities. Evaluators rate employees on a numeric scale or provide
descriptive ratings to indicate the level of performance achieved.

2. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS): BARS method links specific behaviors to different levels
of performance. It involves developing a set of behavioral statements that describe effective and ineffective
performance. Evaluators then rate employees based on their demonstration of these behaviors. This method
provides more detailed and specific feedback compared to graphic rating scales.

3. 360-Degree Feedback: This method gathers feedback from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers,
subordinates, and sometimes even customers or clients. It provides a comprehensive view of an employee's
performance by collecting input from different perspectives. 360-degree feedback helps in identifying
strengths and development areas and promotes a more holistic assessment.
Methods of Performance Appraisal
4. Management by Objectives (MBO): MBO is a goal-oriented approach to performance appraisal. In this
method, employees and managers jointly set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound
(SMART) performance goals. The progress towards these goals is regularly reviewed and evaluated. MBO
aligns individual goals with organizational objectives and focuses on outcomes.

5. Critical Incident Technique: This method involves documenting specific incidents of exceptional or
problematic performance. The evaluator maintains a record of incidents that illustrate exemplary or poor
performance by an employee. Critical incidents are used to provide feedback, identify areas for
improvement, and make decisions about promotions or rewards.
Overcoming Performance
Appraisal Challenges
1. Provide training and support for appraisers and employees: One of the significant challenges in
performance appraisals is the lack of understanding and competence among appraisers and employees.
Training programs can help appraisers develop assessment skills and provide constructive feedback. Training
employees on self-assessment and understanding performance expectations can also be valuable.

2. Foster a culture of continuous feedback and open communication: Traditional annual or biannual
appraisals can often lead to a lack of communication and feedback throughout the year. To overcome this
challenge, organizations should encourage continuous feedback and open communication channels.
Implementing regular check-ins, coaching, and mentoring programs can facilitate ongoing discussions about
performance, goals, and development.
 Overcoming Performance
Appraisal Challenges
3. Regularly update performance criteria and measurement methods: Performance criteria should align with the
organization's goals and adapt to changing business environments. Regularly reviewing and updating performance criteria
and measurement methods is essential to ensure they remain relevant, fair, and aligned with strategic objectives. This
includes collecting feedback from appraisers, employees, and stakeholders to refine and improve the appraisal process.

4. Ensure fairness and minimize bias in the appraisal process: Bias and unfairness in performance appraisals can lead to
demotivation, disengagement, and decreased trust. Organizations should proactively identify and address potential biases
based on age, gender, race, or other demographic factors. Employing clear and objective performance criteria,
implementing multiple evaluators, and using performance data and evidence can help minimize biases and ensure fairness
in the appraisal process.

5. Emphasize employee development and growth opportunities: Performance appraisals should not solely focus on
evaluating past performance but also highlight opportunities for employee development and growth. By linking
performance assessments with personal development plans, organizations can motivate employees to improve, learn new
skills, and achieve their career aspirations. This approach encourages a positive outlook on the appraisal process and
promotes a sense of investment in both individual and organizational growth.
 References
-Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
-Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy: Implications for managerial effectiveness and development. Journal of Management
Development, 21(5), 376-387.
-Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
-Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
-Albrecht, S. L., & Travaglione, A. (2003). Myths and realities of performance appraisal: An empirical investigation of new influences. Personnel Review, 32(1), 72-97.
-Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: Performance management in action. CIPD Publishing.
-Demirci, A., & Nyhan, R. C. (2017). Performance appraisal, evaluation, and feedback: An international perspective. Routledge.
-Dessler, G. (2016). Human Resource Management. Pearson Education India.
-Bannister, B.D., & Balkin, D.B. (2016). Management. London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
-Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London, UK: Kogan Page Publishers.
-DeCenzo, D.A., & Robbins, S.P. (2016). Human Resource Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
-Werner, J.M., & DeSimone, R.L. (2019). Human Resource Development. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
-Voskuijl, O.F., & Claessens, B.J. (2017). Human Resource Management Practices: Assessing Added Value. London, UK: Routledge.
-Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (n.d.). Performance Appraisal. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/pages/
performanceappraisal.aspx
-Cascio, W.F., & Boudreau, J.W. (2014). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 1-4.
-Cawley, B.D., Keeping, L.M. & Levy, P.E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615–633. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615
-London, M. (2003). Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement. Psychology Press.
-Bracken, D.W., & Dalton, M.A. (2004). Should 360-degree feedback be used only for development purposes? Human Resource Management Review, 14(4), 451–468. doi:
10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.10.001
-Dobbins, G.H., & Woehr, D.J. (2004). Supervisory feedback: Its relationship to evaluations of management training outcomes and transfer of training. Human Resource
Development Quarterly, 15(3), 307–323. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1095
-DeNisi, A.S., & Kluger, A.N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129–139. doi:
10.5465/ame.2000.2759825