Contrast of

Mentalist &
Behaviorist theory
of SLA
 Language acquisition theories
• In a Broader sense, various theories and approaches
have been emerged over the years to study and analyze
the process of language acquisition. Four main schools
of thought, which provide theoretical paradigms in
guiding the course of language acquisition are:
• Imitation, Nativism or Behaviorism: based on
empiricist or behavioral approach.
• Innateness or Mentalism: based on the rationalistic or
mentalist approach
• Cognition: based on the cognitive-psychological
approach
• Motherese or Input: based on the maternal approach to
language acquisition.
 Behaviorist
Skinner and his followers are known as
behaviorist. According to them language
learning is a process known as operant
conditioning.
Conditioned Behavior - behavior in which the
training is repeated.
Operant – voluntary behavior; it is the result of
the learner’s own free will, and it is not forced
by any person or thing from the outside. The
learner demonstrates the new behavior first
as a response to a system of reward or
punishment, and finally as an automatic
response.
 B.F. Skinner (1904-1990)
“ Give me a child and I’ll shape
him into anything.”
 Experiment
• They put a rat in a box containing a bar. If it presses the
bar, it is rewarded with a pallet of food. Nothing forces it
to push the bar.
• It probably does accidentally at the first time. When the
rat finds out that food will arrive, it will press the bar
again.
• Task was made difficult; the rat only gets rewarded with
food if it presses the bar while a light is flashed.
• At first the rat was puzzled but eventually learns the
trick.
• To make it more difficult, the rat can only receive food if it
presses the bar more than once.
• After initial confusion it learned to do so. And so on, and
so on.
-
Skinner Box
-

STIMULUS RESPONSE REINFORCEMENT

REPETITION
 -
• In Operant conditioning, reinforcement plays
a vital role.
• TWO kinds of Reinforcement:
1. Positive Reinforcement (Praise and rewards)
2. Negative Reinforcement (Rebuke
and punishments)
 .
• Noam Chomsky explicitly rejects the
behaviorists’ position that language should
be thought of as verbal behavior, arguing
that it should be thought of as knowledge
held by those who use language.
• Chomsky suggests that the learner of any
language has an inbuilt learning capacity of
language that enables each learner to
construct a kind of personal theory or set of
rules about the language based on very limited
exposure to language.
Noam Chomsky (1928, 86yrs old)
“The general population doesn’t
know what’s happening, and it
doesn’t even know that it doesn’t
 Mentalist
• Chomsky and his mentalist followers claim that a
child learns his first language through cognitive
learning. They claim that language is governed by
rules, and is not a haphazard thing, as Skinner
and his followers would claim.
• According to Chomsky, the child is born with a
mental capacity for working out the
underlying system to the jumble of sounds
which he hears.
• He constructs his own grammar and imposes it on
all the sound reaching his brain.
…
• The mental grammar is part of his cognitive
framework, and nothing he hears is store in his
brain until he has matched it against what he
already knows and found a ‘correct’ place for it
within this framework.
• Chomsky argues that language is so complex that
it is almost incredible that it can be acquired by
a child in a so short of time.
• He says that a child is born with some innate
mental capacity which helps the child to process
all the language which he hears.
 Language Acquisition Device
He saw it as comprising a special area of the
brain whose only function is the processing
of language.
When Chomsky talks about ‘rules’, he means
the unconscious rules in a child’s mind. These
rules enables him to make grammatical
sentences in his own language.
Chomsky does not mean that a child can do
as described in these rules explicitly.
For example,
• A four or five year old child can produce a
sentence like “I’m done with my work”; he can
do that because he has a ‘mental grammar’
which enables him to form correct present
perfect structures and also to use such
structures in the right and appropriate
situations. But he is unable to define the
formation of present perfect tense.
 Mentalism
• Language learning is innate ability
• Mental (own rules) and Grammatical
sentences
 Conclusion
• Both theories states significant things,
yet neither is perfect.
• The mentalists’ emphasis on the rule-
learning is over enthusiastic, and the
behaviorists’ rejection of meaning is entirely
unjust.
• Language acquisition seems to be a process
both of analogy and application, both
nature and nurture.
 Behaviorist Mentalist
1. Language acquisition is Language is an innate, in-born
stimulus-response process. . process.
2. Language is a conditioned Language is not a behavior
behavior like other behaviors, but a
specific mental process.
3. Children learn language Children learn language
by imitation and analogy. by application.
4. Language learning is based Language learning is
on practice. analytical, generative
and creation.
5.The role of imitation, The role of exposure to
repetition, reinforcement language is quite vital.
and motivation is very
significant in language
learning. Language acquisition is
the result of nurture.
 Conclusion
• This comparative study makes one thing clear:
nature and nurture, analogy and application,
practice and exposure, are important.
• Innate potentialities lay down the framework.
Within this framework, there is a wide variation
depending on the environment. The kind of
language that children ultimately grown into
shaped by the culture-based responses of the
family, if not in a way that can be called imitation,
then at least in terms of things the child chooses
to do with its language.
…
• But we should be wary of the idea that all children
experience the same practices and follow the same
development path as they grow into their language.
• Having been exposed to a small number of utterances,
the child begins to extract the principles underlying
the utterances and compose new words of his own.
• This is the way every child grammar communicate in
an intelligent manner.
• He make mistakes and produces ungrammatical
sentences. His elders correct him; he feeds the
information into his mini-grammar, modifies some of
the rules, and again produces new utterances.
…
• In a period of about four years, he is able to
master and internalize all the essential rules
of language.
• This proves that a child’s own rules of
grammar are more important to him than
mere imitation.