ANALYZING THE EVOLUTION OF

WORKPLACE REGULATIONS: A STUDY ON

THE SIGNIFICANCE AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDING
ORDERS ACT
 RESEARCH QUESTION AND
OBJECTIVE

 Research Paper: What are the Historical Transformations and

Contemporary Implications of Workplace regulations. A
comprehensive Examination of the Implementation and
Importance of the Act

 Objective: The objective of this paper is to comprehensively

examine the historical evolution, relevance of workplace
regulations.
 INTRODUCTION

 The modern workplace is a dynamic ecosystem shaped by societal, economic,

and legal influences.

 Among the pivotal legislative frameworks governing Labour relations, the

Standing Orders Act stands as a cornerstone in safeguarding the rights and
obligations of both employers and employees.

 Over time, the regulation of Labour practices has undergone significant

evolution, reflecting the changing needs and dynamics of the workforce.
 THE STANDING ORDERS ACT: HISTORICAL
CONTEXT AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK

The roots of the Standing Orders Act can be traced

back to the early 20th century when industrialization
Historical Framework spurred the need for standardized guidelines to govern
employer-employee relationships.

1. Establishment of Rules
2. Employee Rights and Obligations
Legislative Framework 3. Dispute Resolution
IMPACT AND SIGNIFICANCE

 Protecting Employee Rights

 Balancing Employer-Employee Relations
 Preventing Arbitrary Actions
 Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
 EVOLUTION OF LABOUR LAWS: SHIFTING PARADIGMS
IN EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS IN STANDING
ORDERS ACT

Emergence of labour
Early Industrialization movements

Focus on worker Transition to modern

protection and rights workplace regulations
 IMPORTANT CASE STUDIES
M/S Lakshmi Precision Screws Ltd. v. Ram Bhagat (2002)
- The Supreme Court held that the appellant acted in an arbitrary manner by issuing the notice to the workman in
just 4 days, while the standing order gave the provision of 10 consecutive days of absence. Moreover, he was not
given the opportunity to present his case and give reasons for his absence. It was also observed that the
principles of natural justice are one of the requirements of standing orders and must be adhered to. The appeal of
the appellant was thus dismissed.

N.D.M.C. v. Mohd. Shamim (2003)

- The Industrial Tribunal in this case set aside the order passed by the petitioner, which was challenged
in the High Court. It was observed that a permanent employee is one who is employed on a permanent
basis and has completed the probationary period according to the model standing order. It was held by
the High Court that the respondent does not fall into the category of a permanent employee. Further, it
said that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain this application. However, the Court considered
that the respondent had died, and so it was held that 50% of the wages that he drew during the
pendency of the case would not be recovered from his family and representatives.
 KEY
PROVISIONS
OF THE ACT
 CONCLUSION

 Significance in Employment Regulation

 Impact on Different Sectors
 Challenges in Implementation
THANK YOU!