Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mission Review Deck GPD AG KRG
Mission Review Deck GPD AG KRG
Speech Pace
If the pace of the pitch is between
Shows how a learner's delivery of words compares with the Appropriate
120 and 160 words per minute
average speaking rate of 120-160 words per minute.
The Speech Pace insight helps you understand if the pace
at which a learner delivered their submission is slow, If the pace of the pitch is between
appropriate, or fast. It displays the average number of Fast
160 and 200 words per minute
words per minute that the learner spoke. It also displays
the average speaking rate for comparison
If the pace of the pitch is more than
Too fast
200 words per minute
Insight Criteria
Filler Words
Highlights how often the learner used commonly used filler Between 5 and 10 filler words per
words in their submission. For example, if a learner Many filler words used
minute
repeatedly used the word “basically” in their submission,
the Filler Words insight lists “basically” as a filler word
along with the number of times it was repeated.
Fewer filler words used Less than 5 filler words per minute
Review and in-video
comments
You can also add In-Video Comments
in the learner’s submission.
• When you go through the submission,
position your cursor over the video seek
bar.
• The Add Comments text box appears.
• Click the Add Comments text box to
enter your feedback, comments,
observations, or even emojis.
• When you have entered your comment,
click the blue check mark to add it.
The pitch successfully included each S (simplicity, security, savings, and sustainability)
5
with solutions tied back to each.
Use of the four Ss was mostly successful, but some coaching or guidance is needed to tailor
4
solutions to one or two of the Ss.
The pitch included the four Ss, but a connection was not made to solutions for each.
3
Coaching and guidance are needed for success.
The pitch did not include the four Ss or did not accurately reference each in their message.
2
Coaching and direction are needed for success.
1 The pitch message was completely off track, so considerable coaching and redirection are needed.
CRITERIA
Pitch delivery had some flaws, including significant use of filler words, mumbled words, poor body
3 language or too many acronyms. The pitch did not have a hook or attention grab such as “Your
journey to cloud is over.”
The pitch contained more than two major delivery flaws such as mumbling, too many acronyms, no
2
hook, significant use of filler words, and so on.
1 The pitch was poorly delivered and not friendly; it contained a hostile tone or poor body language.
CRITERIA
Pitch Quality
5 The pitch quality was excellent and should be posted on the company website.
4 The pitch was accurate, tailored, and on message, but delivery could use some improvement.
3 The pitch delivery was well done but was not tailored, or it deviated from key message (four Ss).