You Exec - Problem Solving Frameworks Free

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Get the full version of this framework and

You Exec provides business resources that move your career access our library of hundreds of other
forward. Access our full library of presentations, spreadsheet
models, and business book summaries. We do the work, you take
business resources.
the credit.

Join You Exec Plus today and take your career to new
Errors & Omissions Liability (E&O): You Exec makes no heights. Receive premium business resources in your
guarantee that the statements, analysis, projections, estimates, inbox every week.
graphs, reports, numbers, and any derivatives sourced from this
presentation are free of errors and omissions. You Exec assumes
no liability for erroneous outcomes derived from this
presentation. Start today

Found an error, have suggestions? Feedback


A3 PROBLEM-SOLVING SHEET

STEP 1: Subject/Background/History STEP 5: Countermeasures/Suggested Actions/Changes

• What are we trying to achieve with this process? • What specific actions are needed to eliminate the problem?
• What is the Background to the problem (be as specific as possible).
• Give an explanation which helps people to better understand the problem.
• State the importance of the problem.

DO (5-6)
STEP 2: Current Condition STEP 6: Implementation

• Draw a diagram of current condition. WHAT WHEN (DATE) WHO

• Highlight the problem. Task A Jan 3, 20XX Tom Jerry


• Use data to explain the size of the problem.
Task B March 8, 20XX Joan Appleseed
PLAN (1-4)

Task C Oct 25, 20XX Grant Parker

STEP 3: Root Cause Analysis STEP 7: Evaluation

CHECK (7)
• Collect and analyze data to identify root cause. • Check the result.
• Use 5 Whys, Fishbone Diagrams, Pareto Charts • Did the improvement work?
• Did it work as well as we predicted?
• Collect data and compare before and after.

STEP 4: Target Condition/Future State/Desired Outcome STEP 8: Follow-up

ACT (8)
• Draw a diagram of what the new process will look like. • What actions must we take in future to sustain the improvement?
• Identify WHERE the Root Cause is being eliminated. • Did we achieve at 7/30/90 days what we wanted?
• Define Target to support proposed improvement. • Is the problem eliminated and does the process show measurable improvement?
• Can we close this problem-solving process and achieve it as Complete/Closed?
ANALYSIS DESIGN: WORK PLANNING

Issue/Hypothesis Analysis Data Sources Responsibility Due Date

Does the new process require special facilities? Diana


Technical Specification Articles, Interviews 3 June
NO

List of Facilities that meet new Jorge


Facilities management, interviews 5 July
criteria

If it does require special facilities, can we acquire Facilities management, thrum-mat Stephanie
Map of “facilities gap” 7 August
them? YES line supervisors

Sources of required Chin-Yang


Operations, trade publications 7 September
facilities/equipment

Operations, contractors, Jane


Costs to fill gaps 10 November
interviews

Finance department, prior Jerome


Effect on Project rate of return 12 December
analysis
FISHBONE DIAGRAM

• Wrong specification of the material • Wrong size of the mold • Machine malfunction
• Poor storage conditions − Blueprint mistake − Employee’s fault
• Worn out material − Production mistake − Machine defect

MATERIAL MEASUREMENT MACHINE

The part is
produced in the
wrong size

METHOD ENVIRONMENT PEOPLE

• Wrong production procedure • Wrong production conditions • Employee mistake


− Too hot − Mistaken machine settings
− Too cold − Mistake in production
− Too humid procedures
FMEA MATRIX Probability

< 1% 1%-5% 5%-25% 25%-50% >50%


Severity & Equipment/ Remote Extremely Very Unlikely Likely
Classification Safety Maintenance Cost Production Environment Unlikely Unlikely

Multiple fatalities, > 5. Large


Disastrous

Major loss, not recoverable. Major pollution with sustained


effects on large external Extensive damage
5 More than 3 days lost environmental consequences external 5 10 15 20 25
inhabited zones- several >$8M
production to the site
fatalities
Catastrophic

Lethal effect on several persons


Major loss. Up to 50% not
(several fatalities). Lethal external Major damage Major pollution external to the site.
4 recoverable Up to 3 days lost 4 8 12 16 20
effect - one fatality, several physical $6M-$8M Evacuation of persons
production.
injuries

Medium loss, not wholly


Lethal effect on one person and/or
Major

Localized damage recoverable through normal Moderate pollution, within site


3 several permanent invalidities. 3 6 9 12 15
$2M-$6M production < 24 hours lost limits. Product liability
Permanent external effects
production

Minor loss, recoverable Spill or release of pollutant requiring


Serious

Permanent injury, lost time accident. Minor damage


2 through normal production 2 a declaration to authorities but 2 4 6 8 10
Non-permanent external effects $200K-$2M
to 8 hours lost production without environmental consequences

No permanent injury,
Moderate

Little to no effect. Production


recordable with no lost Slight damage Minor spill or release of pollutant,
1 easily recovered. < 2 hour 1 2 3 4 5
time/medical treatment. No < $200K not requiring a declaration
lost production.
external effect
OUTCOME EVALUATION

ITEMS DONE NOT DONE

N % N %

Assessment collecting, organizing, validating, and documenting client data 70 100 0 0

Analyze and synthesize data. Problem identification. 68 97.1 2 2.9

Planning/goal/outcome determining how to prevent, reduce, or resolve


66 94.3 4 5.7
the identified client problems

Implementation carry out the planned interventions. 70 100 0 0

Evaluation measuring the degree to which goal/outcomes have been achieved and identifying factors
55 78.6 15 21.4
that positively or negatively influence goal achievement.
8%
15%

COUNTERMEASURE IMPLEMENTATION Plan Do Act Check


62% 15%
BASED ON PDCA

Target Completion Next


Item Corrective Action Responsible Start Date P D A C
Completion Date Follow Up

Create a standard for starting with


preferred candidates, then switching to
01 Leader #1 10-Feb 10-Feb 10-Feb C 10-Feb
min quals. Based on set parameters

02 Communicate standard from #1 Leader #2 17-Feb 2-Mar D

Leader #3 to meet with operations


03 Leader #3 7-Feb 7-Feb 7-Feb C 7-Feb
managers and finalize success profile

Communicate the finalized success


04 Leader #4 14-Feb 14-Feb A
profile to recruiting team

Schedule and attend meeting to discuss


05 roles and responsibilities between HR & Leader #5 10-Feb 10-Feb 10-Feb C 10-Feb
BL #1 dev. specialist

Align Success Profile to behavioral


06 Leader #6 14-Apr 14-Apr A
interview questions, phone screen

Create a new assessment scoring matrix


07 Leader #7 28-Feb 28-Feb 28-Feb C 28-Feb
that is PASS/FAIL oriented
Get the full version of this

presentation with this slide when

you join You Exec Plus.

Start today
Get the full version of this

presentation with this slide when

you join You Exec Plus.

Start today
Get the full version of this

presentation with this slide when

you join You Exec Plus.

Start today
Get the full version of this

presentation with this slide when

you join You Exec Plus.

Start today
Get the full version of this

presentation with this slide when

you join You Exec Plus.

Start today
Related
The following resources are related to
this framework and can save you
hours of work.

If you’re a free or paid member, log


into You Exec first for a better Decision-Making Models Root Cause Analysis
download experience.

MECE Principle Business Continuity

You might also like