The document argues in favor of non-democratic rule by making four key points. It states that non-democratic rulers do not have to deliberate or worry about public opinion, which can save time and money by avoiding delays in policymaking. It also claims that non-democratic decision-making can improve over time for both the people and the government. Finally, it suggests that non-democratic processes may be able to eliminate low-quality decisions by not having to consider every viewpoint.
The document argues in favor of non-democratic rule by making four key points. It states that non-democratic rulers do not have to deliberate or worry about public opinion, which can save time and money by avoiding delays in policymaking. It also claims that non-democratic decision-making can improve over time for both the people and the government. Finally, it suggests that non-democratic processes may be able to eliminate low-quality decisions by not having to consider every viewpoint.
The document argues in favor of non-democratic rule by making four key points. It states that non-democratic rulers do not have to deliberate or worry about public opinion, which can save time and money by avoiding delays in policymaking. It also claims that non-democratic decision-making can improve over time for both the people and the government. Finally, it suggests that non-democratic processes may be able to eliminate low-quality decisions by not having to consider every viewpoint.
Non-democratic rulers do not have to bother about deliberation in assemblies or worry
about majorities and public opinion. It save time , money & labor from formation of new government & avoid the delay in policy making & new law enforcement Improves the decision making ability of both people & government over the time. A non-democratic process is you might be able to eliminate the lowest common denominator from the decision making process entirely. THANK YOU