The judiciary systems of France and Switzerland both stem from civil law traditions but have some differences. France has a hierarchical judiciary with courts of last resort including the Court of Cessation, State Council, Constitutional Council, and Jurisdictional Dispute Council. Switzerland has a federal structure with cantonal courts and a Federal Supreme Court. Both countries' supreme courts serve as the highest appellate authorities but Switzerland's also handles constitutional matters while France's Constitutional Council reviews laws. Judges are appointed differently, with France's president nominating judges while Switzerland's are often appointed locally or by the Federal Assembly.
The judiciary systems of France and Switzerland both stem from civil law traditions but have some differences. France has a hierarchical judiciary with courts of last resort including the Court of Cessation, State Council, Constitutional Council, and Jurisdictional Dispute Council. Switzerland has a federal structure with cantonal courts and a Federal Supreme Court. Both countries' supreme courts serve as the highest appellate authorities but Switzerland's also handles constitutional matters while France's Constitutional Council reviews laws. Judges are appointed differently, with France's president nominating judges while Switzerland's are often appointed locally or by the Federal Assembly.
The judiciary systems of France and Switzerland both stem from civil law traditions but have some differences. France has a hierarchical judiciary with courts of last resort including the Court of Cessation, State Council, Constitutional Council, and Jurisdictional Dispute Council. Switzerland has a federal structure with cantonal courts and a Federal Supreme Court. Both countries' supreme courts serve as the highest appellate authorities but Switzerland's also handles constitutional matters while France's Constitutional Council reviews laws. Judges are appointed differently, with France's president nominating judges while Switzerland's are often appointed locally or by the Federal Assembly.
The judiciary systems of France and Switzerland both stem from civil law traditions but have some differences. France has a hierarchical judiciary with courts of last resort including the Court of Cessation, State Council, Constitutional Council, and Jurisdictional Dispute Council. Switzerland has a federal structure with cantonal courts and a Federal Supreme Court. Both countries' supreme courts serve as the highest appellate authorities but Switzerland's also handles constitutional matters while France's Constitutional Council reviews laws. Judges are appointed differently, with France's president nominating judges while Switzerland's are often appointed locally or by the Federal Assembly.
• French civil code in 1804 under Napolean 1 • Judiciary is independent from legislative and executive • Two major branches 1. Ordinary courts(criminal and civil) 2. Administrative courts( deals with administrative law-suoervise the govt and handle complaints) Four courts of last resort: 1. Court of cessation
2. State council
3. Constitutional council
4. Jurisdictional dispute council
Features: • System of civil law • Diff types of law codes • Principle of collegiality • Independencevof judiciary • Non separate courts for civil and criminal cases • Absence of habeas corpus • Distinction between ordinary and administratice court Judiciary in Switzerland Introduction: • Swiss federal tribunal • Supreme court of the country • Federal judiciary consist of 1. Federal supreme court 2. Federal criminal court 3. Federal patent court 4. Federal administrative court • Motto is law justice and peace Federal supreme court • Headquarter in lausanne and permanent seat also • Supreme judicial authority of swiss • Court of appeal for all decisions of cantonal courts • Supervise other 3 courts • Consist of 38 federal judges current 14 women and 24 men • Elected by federal assembly (legislative) • Elected for a term of 6 years and can be re elected • Tribunals can elect it’s own president and V.president for a term of 2 years Comparative analysis Legal Systems: Switzerland: Operates under a civil law system with influences from the Germanic and Napoleonic legal traditions. France: Also follows a civil law system, heavily influenced by the Napoleonic Code. Court Structure: Switzerland: Has a federal structure with separate courts for each canton (state) and a federal supreme court. France: Features a hierarchical system with local courts, appellate courts, and a Court of Cassation as the highest authority Comparative analysis Supreme Court: Switzerland: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court serves as the highest court in the country, handling federal law and constitutional matters. • France: The Court of Cassation is France’s highest court, overseeing the application of law and ensuring uniformity of jurisprudence. Comparative analysis Judicial Appointment: Switzerland: Judges are often appointed by the cantonal governments, with the Federal Supreme Court judges appointed by the Federal Assembly. • France: Judicial appointments are typically made by the President, following recommendations from the High Council of the Judiciary Comparative analysis Role in Constitutional Matters: Switzerland: The Federal Supreme Court in Switzerland has the authority to interpret and rule on constitutional issues. France: The Constitutional Council in France specializes in constitutional review and ensures laws comply with the constitution. Language of Legal Proceedings: Switzerland: Multilingual, with proceedings conducted in one of the four official languages (German, French, Italian, and Romansh) based on the region. • France: French is the official language of legal proceedings. Thank You Presented by: Sidra Muhammad faisal