Final DPR

On receipt of comments from client, Draft

DPR is modified incorporating revisions
and final DPR is submitted by consultant.
 Output of DPR
• Schedule A Site of the Project
– Annex I Site
– Annex II Dates for providing ROW (max
150 days after the appointed
date)
– Annex III Alignment Plans
– Annex IV Environment Clearances
• Schedule B Development of the Project
Highway
 Output of DPR
• Schedule B Development of the Project
Highway
– Annex I Description of Two Laning
• Schedule C Project Facility
• Schedule D Specification and
Standards
Annex- I Manual of Specification and
Standards for Two laning of Highways
(IRC: SP: 73-2015)
 Output of DPR
• Schedule H Contract Price Weightages
The proportions of the contract price for
different stages of construction of the
project Highway shall be specified in this
schedule.

• Schedule I Drawings
• Schedule J Project Completion Schedule
 Objectives of Scrutiny
• To make sure of adequacy of
investigations.
• To Check the authenticity of the data.
• To verify the optimality of design and
estimation.
• To check the provisions made as per
the guidelines, codes and
specifications.
 Important Factors for Scrutiny

• Selection of Alignment.
• Land Availability.
• Traffic Volume.
• Soil Characteristics.
• Design and Specification.
• CD works.
• Drawings.
 Special Emphasis for Cost Effective Design

• Stabilization of Soil sub-grades.

 Lime Stabilization
 Cement Stabilization
 Any other Stabilization process like use of eco
friendly enzyme.
• Use of local materials and industrial waste
 Use of Marginal Aggregates.
 Use of Fly Ash.
 Use of Industrial Wastes.
 Scrutiny of DPR for EPC
projects
• Article 10 of EPC Agreement deals with
Design and Construction of works
• Design director to be appointed by
Contractor to be responsible for preparation
of Preliminary and detailed designs
• Proof check consultant to be appointed by
contractor with approval of AE
 Scrutiny of DPR contd.
• Drawings to be submitted to AE for review
• AE to convey its observation within 15 days
in general and within 30 days for Major
bridge or structure.
• If drawings are not in conformity,
Contractor to revise the drawings and
resubmit to AE
• AE to give its comment within 10 days
works
 Scrutiny of DPR contd.
• In case of non compliance AE may
withhold the payment for the affected
works
In case of dispute, the same shall be resolved
as per Dispute resolution procedure
 Estimates
• Original works –
– Road works
– Bridge works
– Improvement of Riding Quality
• Maintenance works –
- Periodic Renewal works
- Flood damage repairs
- Special repairs
- Ordinary repairs
 Estimates (contd.)
• Other centrally sponsored schemes (for
state roads) -
- Central road fund works
- Inter-state connectivity and economic
importance works (excl. rural roads)
 Cost Estimates – Centage Charges
Sl.No. Particulars Road Projects Bridge Projects
(per cent) (per cent)
1. Contingencies 2.8 2.8
2. Quality Control 1 1
3. Work Charge Establishment
a) For works upto Rs. 25 2 2
lakhs
b) For works Rs. 25-50 lakhs 1.75 1.5
c) For works above Rs. 50 1.50 1.0
lakhs
4. Agency Charges 9 9
 Original Estimates
• Estimated amount of work x
• Provision of contingencies @ 2.8% of x
• Cost of work C = x + contingencies
• Provision of work charge establishment =
1.5 % of
C
• Provision of Q/C = 1% of C
• Provision of Agency charges = 9 % of C
• TOTAL COST = C+ w/c + Q/c + agency/c
 Centage charges for EPC projects
Cost of work Up to 25 > 25 crore > 50 crore > 100
crore upto 50 upto 100 crore
crore crore
Contingency 2.8 % 2.8 % 2.8 % 2.8 %
Agency 3% 3% 3% 3%
charges
Quality 1% 0.75 % 0.50 % 0.25 %
control
Road Safety 1% 0.75 % 0.50 % 0.25 %
Supervision 6% 5% 4% 3%
 GENERAL DEFICIENCIES

• Deficiencies in DPR may lead to :

• Change in the alignment
• New items of work not anticipated earlier
• Increase in quantity
• Increase in rates
• Time overrun

•
 General Deficiencies (cont’d)
• Major deficiencies resulting in revision of estimate:
o Faulty assessment of requirement of land
acquisition, utility shifting, tree cutting resulting
in delay in project and cost escalation
o Change in scope of work due to inadequate survey
and investigation and variations such as:
Change in alignment
Number of structures to be constructed/rehabilitated
Change in classification of soil and rock
HFL having not been reported properly necessitating
raising
 General Deficiencies (cont’d)
Incorrect ground level resulting in extra earth work
Inadequate soil investigation for ground improvement
Certain items of work not considered
Quantity of leveling course not estimated
o Not adopting current SOR
 Deficiencies in the Design
• Inadequate investigations.
• Failure to check correlations in the soil properties.
• Inaccurate estimation of Design Parameters.
• Non adherence to the provisions of Manuals for Pavement
Component Design.
• In adequate Geometric Design.
• Failure to identify cost aberrations in the components.
• Inappropriate location and design of CD Works.
• Provisions beyond permissible as per guidelines.
• Deficiency in checking the Schedule of Rates, Maintenance
Cost.
• Failure to investigate alternate designs for optimality.
Thank You