The document compares the capital (CAPEX) and operating (OPEX) costs of a forward osmosis reverse osmosis (FO-RO) system to a conventional reverse osmosis (RO) system. The FO-RO system has a lower total capital cost of $6,091,560 compared to $6,484,968 for the conventional RO system. The FO-RO system also has a lower total operating cost of $1.0568 per cubic meter compared to $1.0895 per cubic meter for the conventional RO system. The document provides detailed cost breakdowns for both systems.
The document compares the capital (CAPEX) and operating (OPEX) costs of a forward osmosis reverse osmosis (FO-RO) system to a conventional reverse osmosis (RO) system. The FO-RO system has a lower total capital cost of $6,091,560 compared to $6,484,968 for the conventional RO system. The FO-RO system also has a lower total operating cost of $1.0568 per cubic meter compared to $1.0895 per cubic meter for the conventional RO system. The document provides detailed cost breakdowns for both systems.
The document compares the capital (CAPEX) and operating (OPEX) costs of a forward osmosis reverse osmosis (FO-RO) system to a conventional reverse osmosis (RO) system. The FO-RO system has a lower total capital cost of $6,091,560 compared to $6,484,968 for the conventional RO system. The FO-RO system also has a lower total operating cost of $1.0568 per cubic meter compared to $1.0895 per cubic meter for the conventional RO system. The document provides detailed cost breakdowns for both systems.
Pumping Energy, (RO) Pumping Energy, (RO) 309.947 kW 309.947 Pumping kW Energy, (RO) Pumping Energy, (RO) 444.267 kW 444.267 kW Recovered Energy Recovered Energy 86.940 kW 86.940 Recovered kW Energy Recovered Energy 357.590 kW 357.590 kW Pumping Energy, (FO) Pumping Energy, (FO) 63.571 kW 63.571 Pumping kW Energy, (FO) Pumping Energy, (FO) 0.000 kW 0.000 kW Total Electric Energy Consumption Total Electric Energy Consumption 377.253 kW 377.253 Total kWElectric Energy Consumption Total Electric Energy Consumption 448.710 kW 448.710 kW Total Specific Energy Total Specific Energy 3.735 kW-h/m³ 3.735 Total kW-h/m³ Specific Energy Total Specific Energy 4.487 kW-h/m³ 4.487 kW-h/m³ Pretreatment & Aux. EnergyPretreatment (1%) 3.735 & Aux. Energy (1%)kW-h/m³ 3.735 kW-h/m³ & Aux. EnergyPretreatment Pretreatment (1%) 4.443 & Aux. Energy (1%)kW-h/m³ 4.443 kW-h/m³ Specific Energy Consumption Specific Energy Consumption 3.773 kW-h/m³ 3.773 Specific kW-h/m³ Energy Consumption Specific Energy Consumption 4.487 kW-h/m³ 4.487 kW-h/m³ Power Cost Power Cost 0.1886 $/m³ 0.1886 Power $/m³Cost Power Cost 0.2244 $/m³ 0.2244 $/m³ Chem. (Pre) Cost Chem. (Pre) Cost 0.0355 $/m³ 0.0355 Chem. $/m³(Pre) Cost Chem. (Pre) Cost 0.0666 $/m³ 0.0666 $/m³ Chem. (pH1 adj) Cost Chem. (pH1 adj) Cost 0.0000 $/m³ 0.0000 Chem. $/m³(pH1 adj) Cost Chem. (pH1 adj) Cost 0.0000 $/m³ 0.0000 $/m³ Chem. (pH2 adj) Cost Chem. (pH2 adj) Cost 0.0700 $/m³ 0.0700 Chem. $/m³(pH2 adj) Cost Chem. (pH2 adj) Cost 0.0000 $/m³ 0.0000 $/m³ Mem. Replacement Mem. Replacement 0.0341 $/m³ 0.0341 Mem. $/m³Replacement Mem. Replacement 0.0247 $/m³ 0.0247 $/m³ Maint. Cost Maint. Cost 0.0337 $/m³ 0.0337 Maint. $/m³Cost Maint. Cost 0.0412 $/m³ 0.0412 $/m³ Labor Cost Labor Cost 0.0905 $/m³ 0.0905 Labor $/m³ Cost Labor Cost 0.0892 $/m³ 0.0892 $/m³ O&M Cost O&M Cost 0.4524 $/m³ 0.4524 O&M$/m³ Cost O&M Cost 0.4460 $/m³ 0.4460 $/m³
Total Cost Total Cost 1.0568 $/m³ 1.0568
Total $/m³Cost Total Cost 1.0895 $/m³ 1.0895 $/m³ FO-RO CAPEX RO CAPEX CAPEX Estimation CAPEX Estimation PV cost $ 65,000 PV cost $ 90,000 Mem elem cost $ 109,200 Mem elem cost $ 129,600 RO RO Train cost $ 117,000 Train cost $ 162,000 RO System Cost $ 291,200 RO System Cost $ 381,600 PV cost $ 8,750 PV cost $ - Mem elem cost $ 70,000 Mem elem cost $ - FO FO Train cost $ 5,000 Train cost $ - FO System Cost $ 83,750 FO System Cost $ - Pretreatment Equipment Cost $ 234,300 Pretreatment Equipment Cost $ 439,560 Mem Sys Cost $ 374,950 Mem Sys Cost $ 381,600 Other Equipment Cost $ 374,950 Other Equipment Cost $ 381,600 Site & Construction Cost $ 2,400,000 Site & Construction Cost $ 2,400,000 Sub Total $ 3,384,200 Sub Total $ 3,602,760 Engineering Cost $ 676,840.00 Engineering Cost $ 720,552.00 Indirect Cost $ 1,692,100.0 Indirect Cost $ 1,801,380.0 Contingency Cost $ 338,420.00 Contingency Cost $ 360,276.00 Total Cost $ 6,091,560.00 Total Cost $ 6,484,968.00 Capital Cost Factor 0.0782 Capital Cost Factor 0.0782 Capital Cost $ 0.6044 $/m³ Capital Cost $ 0.6435 $/m³ FO-RO OPEX RO OPEX Some comments on the cost estimation • The water recovery ratio of the RO is less than the FO-RO case, so more membrane area are required, therefore the capex is higher. • Other expenses are percentage of this capex, and therefore it is also higher. • The water recovery ratio of the FO-RO is much higher than the RO, hence lower amount of feed water to be pressurized. Also, the feed salinity is lower than the RO case, hence the required pressure is lower. Therefore, the power consumption is lower. • The recovered energy in case of FO-RO is much lower than the RO due to the lower pressure and flow rate of the brine. • The estimated IRR for 1.0 MIGD, 20 years FO-RO plant would be 23%
• The internal rate of return (IRR) is a metric used in financial
analysis to estimate the profitability of potential investments.