Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cot 2
Cot 2
about?
In what year did the
family of Sarao
created the jeepney?
How many years do our
jeepneys exist here in
the Philippines?
Have you experienced
unforgettable moments
riding a jeepney?
What is the latest issue
about the jeepney?
Who will be most affected
if the government
approves the jeepney
phase-out?
What is your stand
regarding the issue?
If you are given a chance to be
interviewed in 24 Hours, GMA to
provide your stand regarding the
jeepney phaseout, how will you
defend your stand?
DEFEND
A
OBJECTIVEs
01 Explain a stand.
ENT I ARY
EVID
SOURCES
• Surveys
Do some research • des cri pt i ve s t udies
• case studies
e m i c j o u r n a ls
• acad
l a r m a g a z i n e s
• popu
a l i n fo rm at i on
• biographic s o f w or k fr o m
t e s o r s u m m arie
• Quo rities
l i s h e d a u t h o
estab f a n au t ho ri t y or
s i n t e r v i ew o
LIST OF PRO • St a
ord
t
i
i
n
s t
a
i
r
c
y c i t i z en
AND CON • Labor a t o ry r e s e a rch
xt ual anal ys is
• Te
Make an Appeal to Your Audience
1. Through cheering
2. Through rapping
3. Through singing
4. Through poem reading
SHARE! SHARE! SHARE!
After each group’s presentation, the students will provide the following
information:
Stand: __________________
Argument: ________________
Evidences: ________________
Example:
Cheering (Pro1 - Alex):
Alex confidently steps forward, holding the metacard with the word
"Equality" and starts his cheering presentation.
The stand demonstrates The stand is logically sound, The stand generally makes
exceptional logical but there may be a few sense, but there are
reasoning, with a clear flow instances where the argument significant logical gaps or
Logical of ideas and a strong, could be more tightly woven. inconsistencies.
Reasoning coherent argument.
TOTAL =
GIVING OF FEEDBACK
GROUP 1 --------- GROUP 4
GROUP 2 --------- GROUP 3
GROUP 3 --------- GROUP 1
GROUP 4--------- GROUP 2
ACTIVITY TIME
Have CPs and Social Media made families
TOPIC closer or not?
Premise
1: All men are mortal.
2: Railey is a man.
Conclusion: Railey is a mortal.
How do you identify the arguments presented by the writer in the given
manifestoes?
A. The premises show the Deductive Arguments proceeding from the general
ideas/facts to the specific inferences.
B. The premises show the Inductive Arguments deriving from the specific
observations leading to the general conclusion.
C. The premises show the Deductive Arguments proceeding from the general
ideas/facts to the specific inferences. Premise 1 (major/very general
statement), Premise 2 (minor/more specific), and Conclusion (very specific
statement).
D. The premises show the Inductive Arguments proceeding from the general
ideas/facts to the specific inferences. Premise 1 (major/very general
statement), Premise 2 (minor/more specific), and Conclusion (very specific
3. You are participating in a debate on the topic of
environmental conservation. Your stand is in favor
of implementing stricter regulations on industrial
emissions to combat climate change. During the
debate, your opponent argues that imposing
stricter regulations on industrial emissions would
negatively impact economic growth and lead to job
losses. How do you respond?
A. Highlight the long-term economic benefits of addressing climate change,
emphasizing the growth of the green economy and the creation of new job
opportunities in renewable energy sectors.
D. Counter the argument by stating that job losses in certain industries are a
necessary sacrifice for the greater good of the planet and future generations.
4. You are engaged in a discussion about the use of genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture. Your stand is in
support of the responsible and regulated use of GMOs to
enhance crop yields and address global food security
concerns.
D. Challenge the concerns, stating that the benefits of GMOs far outweigh
any potential risks, and advocate for widespread adoption to meet the
growing global demand for food.
5. You are participating in a community forum
discussing the implementation of a mandatory
vaccination policy for public school children to
prevent the spread of infectious diseases. A parent
in the forum expresses concern about the potential
side effects of vaccinations and insists on the right
to make personal choices regarding their child's
health. How do you respond?
A. Emphasize the overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines, citing examples of successful vaccination programs that
have significantly reduced the incidence of preventable diseases.
C. Downplay the potential side effects, highlighting the minimal risk compared to
the severe consequences of outbreaks, and propose educational campaigns to
address concerns and provide accurate information.