Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discussing Mills' (1995)
Discussing Mills' (1995)
Feminist Stylistics
.
FCDA
To reverse blatant sexism that emerged in the wake of post feminist black wash
To challenge frequently taken for granted gendered assumptions and hegemonic power
relations
FCDA suggests the usefulness of language and discourse studies for the investigation of
feminist issues in gender and women studies
What’s in a name?
Inclusion of the term ‘feminist’ in various sub- fields by feminist scholars such as feminist
pragmatics, feminist stylistics, feminist conversation analysis etc.
To bring change across male- stream disciplines in humanities, social sciences and
sciences.
CDA is known for its overtly political stance and is concerned with analysis of various of
social inequality and in justice.
An attempt towards positive discursive construction of female gender.
HEGEMONY AND gender ideology
1. Gender Sensitization
2. Gender and Stereotypes
3. Three Waves of Feminism
4. Gendered Roles in Society
5. It is only for man
6. Gendered classrooms, Family, Society, Work places
7. Gender is violence
8. How to establish a de-gendered society
9. To encourage polarized thinking
Gender in Discourse
Use of colors
Size of picture
On which page it appears either front page or inner page
Semiotics codes and conventions which underlie both linguistic and visual aspects
Socio cultural analysis of media by linking properties of text to ideologies, power
relations and cultural values
An obvious limitation of semiotic analysis is its comparison with linguistically
oriented approaches .
It does attend systematically to detailed properties of the texture of the text.
Gendered Proverbs
Language simply as a tool/vehicle for ideas rather than as a material entity which may in fact shape
those ideas.
As Lee states: ‘Language clearly not a mirror that reflects reality, rather it functions to impose
structure on our perceptions of the world.’ (1992, p.8)
Close analysis makes us aware of the way that language choices may serve the interests of some
people to the detriment of others.
Language & Power: How language contributes to the domination of some people by others.
(Fairclough, 1989, p.4).
Main aim: ‘not only to capture the way in which meanings of gender are represented so that it is
possible to contest/interpret those representations: but also to ‘make strange’ the way gender is
represented in our culture and to think the ways in which it could be represented differently and
more productivity for both genders’.
Understanding ‘Feminist Stylistics’
In the glossary of this book, she defines the term as ‘a form of politically motivated
stylistics which aims is to develop an awareness of the way gender is handled in texts’
(Mills, 2007)
Understanding ‘Feminist Stylistics’
Looking separately at the two terms – ‘feminist’ and ‘stylistics’ – it has to be said
that feminist ideas or feminism in general is truly hard to define, as there are
numerous different aspects and approaches to this topic, which would probably
require its own thesis.
For our purpose it should suffice to say that feminists in general feel that women
in patriarchal societies are often oppressed and discriminated against and that men
and women are treated quite differently.
Understanding ‘Feminist Stylistics’
This does not mean that all men benefit from these societal structures, as there are
also men who are oppressed.
But feminism is aimed at ‘changing the social structure to make it less oppressive
to women, and, for that matter, to men.’ (Mills, 4)
On a linguistic level, feminists’ goal is to illustrate how differently gender is
treated in texts and how language favors men over women.
Understanding ‘Feminist Stylistics’
Taking a quote from Geoffrey Leech and Michael Short, they deepen this statement and
claim that
in general, literary stylistics has, implicitly or explicitly, the goal of explaining the relation between language
and artistic function. The motivating questions are not so much what, as why and how. From the linguist’s
angle, it is ‘why does the author here choose to express himself [sic] in this particular way?’. From the critic’s
viewpoint it is ‘how is such-and-such an aesthetic effect achieved through language?’ (Leech and Short quoted
in Mills, 5)
Thus what the field of stylistics deals with, according to Mills, is why an author decides to use
a particular way of expressing himself/ herself over another and how specific effects are
achieved through language.
Mills’ & Field of Feminist Stylistics
In the second section of analysis, the focal point will be the observation of the meaning of a whole phrase or
sentence, as opposed to looking at words in isolation.
With the former, we often encounter the problem of having a certain view in mind of what the word could
mean, so that we interpret it in particular (negative) ways. When looking at a whole phrase, however, we do
not isolate certain words but see the words in relation to their context, as well as their co-text (words with
which they co-occur)
A: I am going to complain to the director.
The last point of analysis deals with the overall unit of textual analysis, namely
that of discourse.
Mills claims that discourse often does not find its way into a stylistic analysis, as
many critics feel that it is not actually a linguistic matter but rather deals with
larger structures of individual items that make up a whole.
What is even more crucial is the study of the effects of these larger units on the
reader/audience, which means how the text is constructed and how the reader
decodes what is written.
Objectification of female body: Racial discrimination
Black Women
Sprawling figure
Analysis
In the image under analysis, a lady is presented wearing black dress. She is wearing white shoes. A white purse is also
there alongside the lady. In the background, there is a cupboard in which some shoes and bags of different hues are
placed. Some words are also visible in the picture. After making the text analysis, the researcher makes the semiotic
analysis of the image, that is, the process by means of which the object is produced and received. This is the second
phase of Fairclough's model. It involves a paraphrasing or translating into familiar and intelligible terms which is not
immediately apparent or explicit. This is an advertising billboard of metro shoes and company name is also visible in
the picture. Words "My passion, my obsession and my desire" are written in the picture. There is a picture of stylish
lady who is wearing silky black dress and showing golden hair. She is sitting in a reclining posture. Her hair is of
golden color. She is playing the role of a model that uses metro shoes. We can also observe different beautiful shoes
and bags in the picture. Apparently this is an advertising bill board displaying the shoes and bags of a company.
Applying third dimension of Fairclough's model, the researcher makes the critical discourse analysis of the picture. This
dimension is called social analysis. In this phase, the researcher explains the image with reference to social semiotics.
There is repetition of words "my" for three times and this word is associated with passion, obsession and desire. The
word “my” shows the degree of certainty and authenticity. This bill board has been placed to advertise shoes. But these
words have no link with selling that particular shoe. It seems as if the woman in the picture is uttering these words to
attract the public. The woman appears to be a commodity in place of shoes. She is a sex symbol and sex object. She has
been presented in such a way as to distract the attention of the people from other objects. When one looks at the picture
at the first glance, it remains unclear what is she selling. After observing the whole bill board, one comes to know that it
is advertisement of shoes and bags. The woman is eyeing at the watcher of the board in spite of the fact that she is
selling shoes and she should look at them. She is dominant in the whole picture and her eyes show her camera conscious
nature. There is concept of white color and whiteness in the picture. White color gets the attention very easily. Woman's
complexion is white. She is seducing with trickery and incitement. There are various connotations of words in the
picture. "Metro" has been written in red capital words to make it prominent whereas a little place has been specified for
word shoes, and image of shoes. The woman is sitting in inviting posture having seductive eyes and she has put her best
leg forward having a hand on her leg and it seems as if she is not selling shoes. Rather she is exposing herself. Website is
also mentioned on the board to show the authenticity of the brand.
Thus it is clear from this analysis that the capitalists attract the common public by showing them those
elements which are eye catching. In reality, their purpose is to get profit at every cost. They present their
commodities in a very deceptive way.
The researcher has also analyzed the picture with reference to Ronald Barthes’s model of semiological
discourse analysis. For example a picture of a full, dark bottle is a signifier that relates to a specific
signified: a fermented, alcoholic beverage. However, it can be related to a new signified: the idea of healthy,
robust, relaxing experience. Motivations for such manipulations vary, from a desire to sell products to a
simple desire to maintain the status quo. These insights brought Barthes in line with similar Marxist theory.
Same situation can be observed in this picture. The picture depicts the picture of a young lady wearing
advertised shoes. The beholder of the board can relate this situation with his ownwell being. If a lady looks
at the picture, she will feel that after wearing these shoes she will appear as attractive as the woman in the
picture is. So a sign can take part in a new level of signification where it becomes the signifier to a new
signified at another level.
Bravery and men
Brave man
Brave
Stereotyping of women
Semiotic discourses
Conclusion