Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    HDM-4 Caso Estudio - Ensanchar Camino Congestionado

    Uploaded by

    Christian
    The document discusses alternatives for widening a congested 100km road from 6.5m to either 7.5m, 9m, or 14m wide. It analyzes 5 project alternatives: 1) rehabilitation in 2005, 2) rehabilitation in 2000, 3) widening to 7.5m, 4) widening to 9m, and 5) widening to 14m. It models the effects of each alternative on traffic flow, speed, capacity, roughness, and noise to determine the best option.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    HDM-4 Caso Estudio - Ensanchar Camino Congestionado

    Uploaded by

    Christian
    4 views15 pages
    The document discusses alternatives for widening a congested 100km road from 6.5m to either 7.5m, 9m, or 14m wide. It analyzes 5 project alternatives: 1) rehabilitation in 2005, 2) rehabilitation in 2000, 3) widening to 7.5m, 4) widening to 9m, and 5) widening to 14m. It models the effects of each alternative on traffic flow, speed, capacity, roughness, and noise to determine the best option.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses alternatives for widening a congested 100km road from 6.5m to either 7.5m, 9m, or 14m wide. It analyzes 5 project alternatives: 1) rehabilitation in 2005, 2) rehabilitation in 2000, 3) widening to 7.5m, 4) widening to 9m, and 5) widening to 14m. It models the effects of each alternative on traffic flow, speed, capacity, roughness, and noise to determine the best option.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    4 views15 pages

    HDM-4 Caso Estudio - Ensanchar Camino Congestionado

    Uploaded by

    Christian
    The document discusses alternatives for widening a congested 100km road from 6.5m to either 7.5m, 9m, or 14m wide. It analyzes 5 project alternatives: 1) rehabilitation in 2005, 2) rehabilitation in 2000, 3) widening to 7.5m, 4) widening to 9m, and 5) widening to 14m. It models the effects of each alternative on traffic flow, speed, capacity, roughness, and noise to determine the best option.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 15

    Caso Estudio

    Ensanchar Camino Congestionado

    The World Bank


    Escenario 1 - Camino con
    15,000 TMD
    Alternativa 1 Alternativa 3
    - Rehabilitar en 2005 - Ensanchar a 7.5 m
    - Refuerzo 5 cm al 3.5 IRI - Refuerzo 5 cm al 3.5 IRI
    Alternativa 2
    - Rehabilitar en 2000
    - Refuerzo 5 cm al 3.5 IRI Alternativa 4
    - Ensanchar a 9.0 m
    - Refuerzo 5 cm al 3.5 IRI
    Camino en Malo
    Estado
    Alternativa 5
    con 15,000 TMD
    - Ensanchar a 14.0 m
    y 6.5 m de Ancho
    - Refuerzo 5 cm al 3.5 IRI
    Características del Camino
    North Region Roads Section
    Section Name Congested Paved Road Length (km) 100
    Section ID C3A Width (m) 6.5
    Speed flow Two Lane Shoulder (m) 1
    Traffic Flow Commuter Flow Direction Two-way
    Climate Sub-humid/Subtropical-hot Number of Lanes 2
    Class Primary Last Surfacing 1989
    Traffic High
    Geometry Straight and Level
    Surface Bituminous Ride Quality Poor
    Pavement Asphalt Mix on Granular Base Surface Condition Poor
    Structural Adequacy Good Surface Texture Slippery
    Construction Good
    Motorized AADT 15000 Last reconstruction or
    Non-motorized AADT 0 new construction 1989
    Traffic Year 2000
    Estándares de Mantenimiento y
    Mejoramiento
    No.Code Maintenance Standard Name
    1 P100 R.M. + P 100%
    2 O535 R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI

    Economic Financial
    Work Work Work Cost Cost
    No.Code Operation Intervention ($) ($)
    1 RM Shoulder Repair Every Year 1,275/km 1,500/km
    PA Patching Potholing>=0 no./km 8.5/m2 10/m2
    2 RM Shoulder Repair Every Year 1275/km 1500/km
    PA Patching Potholing>=0 no./km 8.5/m2 10.0/m2
    O5 Overlay Dense-graded Asphalt Roughness> 3.5 IRI 8.5/m2 10.0/m2

    Construction Economic Financial


    Duration Cost Cost
    No.Code Improvement Standard Name (years) ($/km) ($/km)
    1 R000 Rehabilitation in 2000 1 170,000 200,000
    2 R005 Rehabilitation in 2005 1 170,000 200,000
    3 W075 Widening to 7.5 m in 2000 1 297,500 350,000
    4 W090 Widening to 9.0 m in 2000 2 425,000 500,000
    5 W140 Widening to 14.0 m in 2000 3 850,000 1,000,000
    Alternativas de Proyecto
    Project Maintenance/Improvement
    Alternative Standard
    No. Name Assignment Year
    1 Base Option R.M. + P 100% 2000
    Rehabilitation in 2005 2005
    R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI 2006

    2 Reha Rehabilitation Rehabilitation in 2000 2000


    R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI 2001

    3 W075 Widening to 7.5 m Widening to 7.5 m in 2000 2000


    R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI 2001

    4 W090 Widening to 9.0 m Widening to 9.0 m in 2000 2000


    R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI 2001

    5 W140 Widening to 14.0 m Widening to 14.0 m in 2000 2000


    R.M. + P 100% + Overlay 5.0 cm at 3.5 IRI 2001
    Características de Congestión

    Condition After Works


    Project Traffic Hourly Speed
    Alternative Flow Flow Flow Capacity
    No. Name Pattern (% AADT) Type (pcse/lane/hr) Friction

    1 Base Option Commuter 13% Two Lane 1300 0.8

    2 Rehabilitation Commuter 13% Two Lane 1300 0.8

    3 Widening to 7.5 m Commuter 13% Two Lane 1400 1.0

    4 Widening to 9.0 m Commuter 13% Wide Two Lane 1600 1.0

    5 Widening to 14.0 m Commuter 13% Four Lane 2000 1.0


    Distribución del Flujo de Trafico
    Volumen Horario = fracción del TMD

    Flujo Periodos
    Pico
    Próximo al Pico
    Flujo Medio
    Próximo a Bajo
    Flujo Bajo

    Numero de Horas en el Año


    Relación Flujo - Velocidad
    - Modelo de Tres Zonas de
    Speed (km/hr) Congestion
    - Indice de Accidentes
    S1
    S2
    S3

    Sult Flow
    Qo Qnom Qult veh/hr
    Relaciones Flujo - Velocidad
    Velocidad (km/hr)

    4 Carriles

    2 Carriles
    2 Carriles
    Anchos
    Flujo
    veh/hr
    Fricción
    Lateral
    Frontera de Eficiencia
    5% Margin
    Congested 6.5 m Road
    400.0

    350.0

    300.0

    250.0

    200.0

    150.0

    100.0

    50.0

    0.0
    0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

    Present Value of Agency Costs


    Base Reha W075 W090 W140
    Rugosidad Media
    Congested 6.5 m Road

    7.0

    6.0

    5.0

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    0.0
    0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

    Present Value of Agency Costs


    Base Reha W075 W090 W140
    Razón Flujo Capacidad en el Periodo Pico
    1.20

    1.00

    0.80

    0.60

    0.40

    0.20

    0.00
    2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
    Year
    BASE REHA W075 W090 W140
    Velocidad de la Flota Promedio
    Congested 6.5 m Road

    120.0

    100.0

    80.0

    60.0

    40.0

    20.0

    0.0
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

    Year
    Base Reha W075 W090 W140
    Efectos del Ruido de Aceleración
    450

    400

    350
    W140
    W090
    300
    W075
    250

    200
    REHA
    150

    100

    50

    0
    0 20 40 60 80 100
    Present Value of Agency Costs

    Without Acceleration Effects With Acceleration Effects

    You might also like