Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group3 Afm
Group3 Afm
Group3 Afm
12.13% 12.02%
12.00%
10.57%
10.00%
8.77%
7.92%
8.00%
6.00%
4.71% 4.63%
4.00%
2.39%
2.00%
0.00%
0.00%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Bonus/Buy Back
Particulars Value
Non Current Assets 278751.20
Current Assets 22853.00
Total Assets 301604.20
Net asset value (NAV) helps assess the fair market value in case the company plans to
liquidate.
The NAV of PVR Ltd was Rs.98694 lakhs and a NAV per share of Rs.21.11, which indicate
the value shareholders will get per share in case of liquidation.
Nav is the apt method to value PVR due to its huge capex for an aggressive acquisition
strategy.
The shareholders will see and appreciation in the value per share due to the huge capital
appreciation in the share price due to high number of acquisitions.
Company has asset to liability ratio of 7:3 indicating the huge value of assets that affects
the NAV.
However a debt to asset ratio of 3 which is a red flag.
DIVIDEND
DISCOUNT MODEL
Dividend Distribution Model (DDM)
Values ₹₹ /Share %
VHGP 9.10 18%
VSGP 41.87 82%
To tal Value 50.97 100%
RESIDUAL INCOME
Residual Income
Values ₹₹
VHGP -1274.94
VSGP -5079.6
+Book Value 0 230.253
To tal value -6124.29
FCFF AND FCFE – Historical Growth
Rates
Year FCFF HPR FCFE HPR
2010 -128948191 -365863219
2011 -71583378 -44.49% -268860644.5 -26.51%
2012 -743192598 938.22% -1051864407 291.23%
2013 -609178189 -18.03% 563715180.2 -153.59%
2014 498200000 -181.78% -996361715.2 -276.75%
2015 -356200000 -171.50% -1123700000 12.78%
2016 1077900000 -402.61% -327406804.6 -70.86%
2017 -2911700000 -370.13% -4203810956 1183.97%
2018 873600000 -130.00% -504877681.9 -87.99%
2019 4300000000 392.22% 4919718245 -1074.44%
Average g 1.32% Average g -22.46%
FCFF AND FCFE – Current Year
Vhgp 176,796.62
Vhgp 96,100.3622
In this we calculate the industry averages by taking comparable companies for several ratios and
then assume the same ratios to the firm in question, in order to calculate the value per share / value
of share price and value of the firm as per Enterprise Value (EV).
Comparable companies taken for this purpose are:
Zee Entertainment
Sun TV Network
Tips Industries Ltd.
TV18 Broadcast
Inox Leisure
Shemaroo Entertainment Ltd.
Saregama India Ltd.
Eros international
Ufo moviez
Balaji telefilms
Particulars P/E P/S P/BV EV/EBITDA EV/EBIT EV/CFO EV/Sales EV/Assets
Industry
Average 26.765 2.929 2.442 17.713 25.067 18.237 3.463 2.012
50
45
40
35
30
25 PVR
20 Industry Average
15
10
0
P/E P/S P/BV EV/ EV/EBIT EV/CFO EV/Sales EV/Assets
EBITDA
Particulars As per Relative Valuation As per Actual data
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
-524248336
-860613381
-1986900000
-3544700000
-4221300000
7,000,000,000.00
6,000,000,000.00
5,000,000,000.00
4,000,000,000.00
3,000,000,000.00
2,000,000,000.00
1,000,000,000.00
-
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
Particulars WORKING CAPITAL
2009-10 695170808 Particulars TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
2010-11 1447438868 2009-10 1192318002 497147194
2011-12 -524248336 2010-11 1972859342 525420474
2011-12 579590382 1103838718
2012-13 -860613381
2012-13 798420278 1659033659
2013-14 627400000
2013-14 947900000 320500000
2014-15 -1986900000
2014-15 1265900000 3252800000
2015-16 194700000
2015-16 4070400000 3875700000
2016-17 -3544700000
2016-17 2244500000 5789200000
2017-18 -4221300000
2017-18 2422300000 6643600000
2018-19 380866930 2018-19 3078500000 2697633070
A company's working capital changes over time as a result of several
operational situations. Hence, working capital can serve as an indicator of how
a company is operating. A very high working capital indicates more funds are
blocked in daily operations, in turn indicating that the company is being too
conservative with its finances. Inversely, too little working capital could be
indicative of less money being devoted towards daily operations, and hence
could be a red flag that the company is being too aggressive.
The working capital of PVR has had huge fluctuations in the last decade with
minimal working capital. Hence, the Woking Capital Policy of PVR is an
aggressive one. This is quite common for companies in the Media industry
5 out of 10 years the working capital has been negative. This happens when
the drivers of current liabilities are more than that of the current assets.
MERGER AND
ACQUISITION
PVR LTD AND MIRAJ CINEMAS
MIRAJ CINEMAS COMPANY
INTRODUCTION
Division of Miraj Entertainment Ltd, entertainment wing of Miraj group of Companies.
5th largest Cinemas chain in India
Hue presence mainly in tier ii and tier iii cities
Current screen count is 128 with presence across India.
WHY MIRAJ CINEMAS