This document outlines 6 anthropological types or characterizations of human nature:
1) Man as Homo Sapiens - Viewing man primarily as a thinking being with an immortal soul or spirit, drawing from ancient Greek and medieval Christian traditions.
2) Man as Homo Faber - Seeing man as a tool-making being, focused on productive activities and technology.
3) Man as Deserteur de la Vie - Considering man as withdrawing from or deserting life.
4) Man as Ubermensch - Portraying man as a superman or overman.
5) Man as Homo Religiosus - Depicting man as a religious being.
This document outlines 6 anthropological types or characterizations of human nature:
1) Man as Homo Sapiens - Viewing man primarily as a thinking being with an immortal soul or spirit, drawing from ancient Greek and medieval Christian traditions.
2) Man as Homo Faber - Seeing man as a tool-making being, focused on productive activities and technology.
3) Man as Deserteur de la Vie - Considering man as withdrawing from or deserting life.
4) Man as Ubermensch - Portraying man as a superman or overman.
5) Man as Homo Religiosus - Depicting man as a religious being.
This document outlines 6 anthropological types or characterizations of human nature:
1) Man as Homo Sapiens - Viewing man primarily as a thinking being with an immortal soul or spirit, drawing from ancient Greek and medieval Christian traditions.
2) Man as Homo Faber - Seeing man as a tool-making being, focused on productive activities and technology.
3) Man as Deserteur de la Vie - Considering man as withdrawing from or deserting life.
4) Man as Ubermensch - Portraying man as a superman or overman.
5) Man as Homo Religiosus - Depicting man as a religious being.
This document outlines 6 anthropological types or characterizations of human nature:
1) Man as Homo Sapiens - Viewing man primarily as a thinking being with an immortal soul or spirit, drawing from ancient Greek and medieval Christian traditions.
2) Man as Homo Faber - Seeing man as a tool-making being, focused on productive activities and technology.
3) Man as Deserteur de la Vie - Considering man as withdrawing from or deserting life.
4) Man as Ubermensch - Portraying man as a superman or overman.
5) Man as Homo Religiosus - Depicting man as a religious being.
Man is a Homo Faber Man as Deserteur de la Vie (Deserter of Life) Man as Ubermensch Man as Homo Religiosus Man as a Social Being I. Introduction
Studies in Philosophical Anthropology could readily be
reduced to at least 6 Anthropological Types. Therse characterizations historically evolved through various traditions starting from the Ancient to the Contemporary times.
These Types are not exclusively contained within the
boundaries of philosophy. It influenced Christian Theology but most especially its doctrines and Spirituality The 6 Anthropological Types 1. The First Anthropological Type: Man as Homo Sapiens In its very general description, man is viewed as a thinking being. Corollary concepts could refer to man as a soul/spirit. In the Ancient Greek Tradition, it is called Pneuma or breath or "spirit" or "soul“ or ruach in Hebrew [Bible].
Pneuma, "air in motion, breath, wind", is equivalent in the
material monism of Anaximenes to aer ("air") as the element from which all else originated.
In Aristotle, it is loosely applied to life [anima] that inhabits
any life form. The notion that man is spirit is scattered in the writings of Plato either directly or indirectly. His Metaphysics and Epistemology highlight the supremacy of the spiritual/ideal world. This distinction is displayed in his famous Divided Line. The line is divided into four parts signified by the main horizontal and vertical lines: (1)Everything below the horizontal line represents the sensible world; everything above it, the world of the forms. Plato means us to proceed from the bottom to the top, from images to higher forms, from the lowest level of reality to the highest. Thus one uses imagination to grasp images, perception to grasp sensible things, and so on. (2) The image is further divided by the vertical line. Everything on the left-hand side of the vertical line represents particular dimensions of reality within the sensible world and the world of the forms. Everything on the right hand side represents the particular faculties one uses to grasp the corresponding dimension of reality. The higher up one goes on the right-hand side of the image the greater the degree of intellectual certainty one attains. Thus the highest degree of certainty is attained by using our understanding which enables us to grasp higher forms. Plato’s Epistemology and Theory of the Soul
SOUL INTEREST CLASS VIRTUE
reason knowledge philosophers wisdom
spirit honor warriors courage justice
desire pleasures commoners temperance
Plato’s theory of the soul (proposed in the Phaedrus)
The soul has three parts, which correspond to three different kinds of interests, three kinds of virtues, three kinds of personalities – The soul has three parts, which correspond to three different kinds of interests, three kinds of virtues, three kinds of personalities –depending on which part of the soul is dominant — and so, properly, to three kinds of social classes that should be based on the three personalities, interests, and virtues. SOUL INTEREST CLASS VIRTUE
reason knowledge philosophers wisdom
spirit honor warriors courage justice
desire pleasures commoners temperance
Justice applies to them all in the sense of their
organization. Reason (and the philosophers) should be in control, with the help of spirit (and the warriors). The philosophers and the warriors are thus the “Guardians” of Plato’s ideal state. This does not seem like a familiar sort of definition for justice, but the result, Plato says, is that each interest is satisfied to the proper extent, or, in society, everyone has what is theirs. SOUL INTEREST CLASS VIRTUE
reason knowledge philosophers wisdom
spirit honor warriors courage justice
desire pleasures commoners temperance
The philosophers have the knowledge they want; the
warriors have the honors they want; and the commoners have the goods and pleasures they want, in the proper moderation maintained by the philosophers and warriors.
The root of all trouble, as far as Plato is concerned, is
always unlimited desire. III. Metaphor of the sun
In The Republic (507b-509c) Plato's Socrates uses the
sun as a metaphor for the source of "intellectual illumination," which he held to be The Form of the Good. The metaphor is about the nature of ultimate reality and how we come to know it. It starts with the eye, which Socrates says is unusual among the sense organs in that it needs a medium, namely light, in order to operate. The strongest and best source of light is the sun; with it, we can discern objects clearly. Analogously for intelligible objects The Form of the Good is necessary in order to understand any particular thing. Thus, if we attempt to understand why things are as they are, and what general categories can be used to understand various particulars around us, without reference to any forms (universals) we will fail completely. By contrast, "the domain where truth and reality shine resplendent" is none other than Plato's world of forms—illuminated by the highest of the forms, that of the Good. IV. The Allegory of the cave The Allegory of the Cave is an allegory used by Plato in his work The Republic to illustrate "our nature in its education and want of education" (514a). It is written as a fictional dialogue between Plato's teacher Socrates and Plato's brother Glaucon at the beginning of Book VII. The Allegory of the Cave is presented after the metaphor of the sun (507b–509c) and the analogy of the divided line (509d–513e). In the dialogue, Socrates describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all of their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall by things passing in front of a fire behind them, and begin to ascribe forms to these shadows According to Socrates, the shadows are as close as the prisoners get to viewing reality. He then explains how the philosopher is like a prisoner who is freed from the cave and comes to understand that the shadows on the wall do not make up reality at all, as he can perceive the true form of reality rather than the mere shadows seen by the prisoners. The Allegory is related to Plato's Theory of Forms, according to which the "Forms" (or "Ideas"), and not the material world of change known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality. Only knowledge of the Forms constitutes real knowledge. In addition, the Allegory of the Cave is an attempt to explain the philosopher's place in society: to attempt to enlighten the "prisoners". V. Charioteer Myth Plato's charioteer myth is found in Phaedrus 245c-257b. The ascent of the mind to celestial and trans-celestial realms is likened to a charioteer and a chariot drawn by two winged horses, one dark and one white. Figuratively represented is the famous Platonic tripartite model of the soul: the charioteer represents reason, or intellect, the dark horse appetitive passions, and the white horse irascible nature. Only by taming and controlling the two horses can the charioteer ascend to the heavens and enjoy a banquet of divine knowledge. Key epistemological features of the charioteer myth are (1) an emphasis upon true knowledge as ascent, (2) and the need to tame one's passionate nature to obtain true knowledge. In Stoic philosophy, pneuma is the concept of the "breath of life," a mixture of the elements air (in motion) and fire (as warmth).
In its highest form, pneuma constitutes the human soul (psychê),
which is a fragment of the pneuma that is the soul of God.
Another Stoic concept which offered inspiration to the Church was
that of 'divine Spirit’. The notion of the Divine Spirit secures the position of the Church that reality is not just material. There is more to the things that we see. This notion has substantially been the focus of reflection in the Pre- Medieval and the Medieval Period especially in Scholastic Philosophy and in Thomistic Philosophy especially. Implicit Deduction of Man as Homo Sapiens
That the soul is valorized, more special, more important
than the body The body is viewed negatively as a corrupt, unessential, and disruptive to the spiritual journey Christian Theology and Spirituality advocates purgation of the body [purification] in order to strengthen the soul’s resolve to pursue the spiritual. GRADED GROUP ACTIVITY
Direction: Go to your group and discuss, thoroughly
the question. Assign a spokesperson for the group. Both written and oral presentation is graded.
THE QUESTION:
What do you think are the inherent weaknesses of the
Greek and Medieval understanding of man as Homo Sapiens? 2. The Second Anthropological Type: Man as Homo Faber