Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cirl5 03
Cirl5 03
Copyright Disclaimer
CHAPTER 3
Admissibility
Learning Outcomes
• Review the different government agencies involved in
assessing inadmissibility.
• Describe the general application requirements for applying for
a visa and entering Canada.
• Identify the grounds of inadmissibility to Canada under IRPA
and understand when exemptions to these grounds apply.
• Describe the types of decisions to which officers may refer in
determining whether persons are inadmissible on certain
grounds.
• Identify and distinguish among the three types of domestic
crime that may make a person inadmissible to Canada:
serious criminality, criminality, and organized criminality.
Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All rights reserved.
4
Definitions (IRPA, s 2)
• Foreign national: A person who is not a Canadian
citizen or a permanent resident; includes a stateless
person
• Eligible
• Meeting the criteria set out in the IRPA or IRPR for
the type of entry sought
• Inadmissible
• Ineligible for entry to Canada for one or more
grounds
Assessment by Officer
• Visa Office or, in some cases, at the port-of entry.
• Assess application for:
1. eligibility – meets requirements for type of
status?
2. inadmissibility – any ground that would make
the applicant inadmissible
Standard of Proof
• IRPA, s 33:
• The facts that constitute inadmissibility … include facts
for which there are reasonable grounds to believe that
they have occurred, are occurring or may occur.
• Recall that the standard of proof in civil matters is the
balance of probabilities (whether a claim or a fact as
alleged is more probably true than not true).
• This is less than civil standard of balance of probabilities
(Canada (AG) v Jolly) but more than mere suspicion (Chiau
v Canada ([MCI]).