Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Schizophrenia - A-LEVEL REVIEW
Schizophrenia - A-LEVEL REVIEW
Symptoms
Positive Negative
Hallucinations - Sensory experiences that have no basis in Avolition - Severe loss of motivation to carry out everyday tasks
reality or distorted perception of real things. Experienced in relation to e.g. work, hobbies, personal care. Results in lowered activity levels and
any sense. E.g. hearing voices or seeing people who aren’t there. unwillingness to carry out goal-directed behaviour.
Delusions - Beliefs that have no basis in reality – make a person Speech poverty - A reduction in the amount and poverty of
with schizophrenia behave in ways that make sense to them but are speech. May include a delay in verbal responses during conversation.
bizarre to others. E.g. beliefs about being a very important person or the DSM emphasises speech disorganisation and incoherence.
victim of a conspiracy.
• Low reliability has been found in diagnosis of schizophrenia. Cheniaux et al. had two psychiatrists independently
diagnose 100 patients using both the DSM and ICD criteria. They found that inter rater reliability was very poor.
One clinician diagnoses 26 patients using the DSM and 44 patients using the ICD. Another clinician diagnosed 13
using the DSM and 24 using the ICD. This study shows not only that there is low reliability of diagnosis between
clinicians but that the criteria itself has low validity.
• A further limitation of diagnosis of schizophrenia is comorbidity. Schizophrenia is comorbid with depression and
substance abuse. For example avolitioin can also be a symptom of depression and hallucinations could be from the
drugs. This impacts on the reliability of the diagnosis and also on validity of the criteria used to diagnoses
schizophrenia
• Another limitation is gender bias. Since the 19080s more men have been diagnosed with schizophrenia than
women. Cotton et al. found that female patients function better than men especially in interpersonal functioning.
This may explain why some women have escaped diagnosis. This is a problem as it impacts on the reliability of
diagnosis
• Final limitation is culture bias. African American and English people of African origin in the UK are more likely to
be diagnosed with schizophrenia. However rates in west India and Africa are not high, foes not indicate genetic
vulnerability. This may be due to social factors and prejudice, and stress factors. Also due to the fact that some
symptoms such as hearing voices are looked on as a positive part of culture (communicating with the dead).
Biological explanations of schizophrenia:
Genetics
• Tienari et al. did a study in which they looked at children who had parents with
schizophrenia but had been adopted shortly after birth by families without
histories of the disorder. It was found that a high number of the children still
developed schizophrenia and they couldn’t have learnt it from their parent
which supports that there must have been a genetic link. However the fact that
not all children developed schizophrenia suggests there must be environmental
influences as well
Biological explanations of schizophrenia:
Dopamine hypothesis
• One of the problems with this theory is the methodology used. It’s going to be retrospective data
which can often be unreliable as the patients may have forgotten things or misremembered
• It could be argued that expressed emotion is not to much a cause but an effect of living with
schizophrenia. Living with a schizophrenic can be stressful which could lead to anger and hostility
in the household. It’s even been criticised as being unethical to criticise a family for expressed
emotion. However there is a lot of data showing that when a schizophrenic patient goes back to a
high EE environment there was a higher chance of relapse than those in low EE environments.
This has been supported by Vaughn who found a 50% relapse rate of those in high EE environments
and a 13% relapse rate in those of low EE environments
• Vuaghn and Leff also looked at the amount of face to face communication patients had with their
families. Those who spent less than 35 hours a week with the family (e.g. worked or went to a day
centre) were less likely to relapse.
• One limitation is that this could lead to a culture of blame, people blaming mothers and families
of those with schizophrenia which isn’t good when the family are already under a lot of stress
from having a family member with schizophrenia
Psychological explanations for schizophrenia:
Cognitive explanation
• Jones et al. (2000) did a meta analysis on patient trials of using CBT. He
found that it was good because it reduces intensity and frequency of
hallucinations but was less effective with their delusional beliefs.
However it did reduce their overall feeling of distress. So this shows that
CBT works for some symptoms but not for others
• Drury et al. (2000) did a 5 year follow up study of patients who’d had CBT.
He found that thought there was immediate benefits, the long term
effects were not as good compared to a control group. Therefore Drury
concluded that there’s no long term benefits or that the short term
benefits are not maintained. Long term there was no difference between
the control group and the CBT group so therefore CBT has less of an
application
Psychological treatments for schizophrenia:
Family therapy
• The diathesis aspect of the diathesis stress model may not necessarily be genetic. However brain damage
from the environment can also increase chances of developing schizophrenia. For example birth
complications have been found to make an individual four times more likely to develop the disorder later
in life than those who experience no such complications.
• Tienri did a study on 145 babies with high genetic risk of schizophrenia who were adopted into families
without a history of the disorder and 158 babies with low genetic risk. Adoptive families were given an
OPAS rating which measures factors such as conflict, lack of empathy and insecurity. Out of the 303
children, 14 went on the develop schizophrenia. 11 of these were from the high risk group. Those in the
high risk group had a significantly higher chance of getting schizophrenia if their adoptive family had a
high OPAS rating. This supports that both genetic vulnerability and an environmental trigger are needed to
develop schizophrenia
• However there are limitations with the methodology of this study. The families were only measured for
their OPAS rating on one occasion. There could have been factors making them seem more stressed at this
particular time when they’re not usually like this. They should have been tested on more than one
occasion. We also can’t say if the stress is caused by the family or the adoptee. Many adoptees act out at
a certain age which could cause the family stress or the family may have always been dysfunctional and
cause stress. Therefore this study may lack validity.