AI dalam perspektif Hak Cipta,

dan perkembangan peraturan

di Indonesia secara umum

Prepared & Presented by: Eugenio Gigih W. S.

 • UU 28/2014
Ciptaan adalah setiap hasil karya cipta di bidang ilmu
pengetahuan, seni, dan sastra yang dihasilkan atas
inspirasi, kemampuan, pikiran, imajinasi, kecekatan,
keterampilan, alau keahlian yang diekspresikan dalam
bentuk nyata.

Ciptaan • US Code Title 17 (Copyrights act)

A work is "created" when it is fixed in a copy or
phonorecord for the first time; where a work is
prepared over a period of time, the portion of it that has
been fixed at any particular time constitutes the work
as of that time, and where the work has been prepared
in different versions, each version constitutes a
separate work.
 Artificial • Merriam Webster
“the capability of computer systems or algorithms to

Intelligenc imitate intelligent human behavior”

• John McCharty
“the science and engineering of making intelligent

e machines”
Contoh
AI
Cara Kerja AI
Contoh “Melatih” AI
Contoh AI • AI Generation
Dall-e

dalam
Midjourney
Stable Diffussion
Leonardo AI

kegiatan • AI Tool

kreatif
Adobe Photoshop Generative Fill
Nvidia Canvas
 • Kepemilikan Hak Cipta?
“Ownership of Content. As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent
permitted by applicable law, you (a) retain your ownership rights in Input and (b)
own the Output. We hereby assign to you all our right, title, and interest, if any, in
and to Output. ”

Hak Cipta
• Getty Images v. Stabilitiy AI

dalam
Karya AI
• Stephen Taller v. United States Copyright Office
“For the foregoing reasons, defendants are correct that the Copyright Office acted
properly in denying copyright registration for a work created absent any human
involvement.” reference case
 • copyright and patent were conceived of as forms of property that the
government was established to protect, and it was understood that
recognizing exclusive rights in that property would further the public good

Generative
by incentivizing individuals to create and invent. The act of human creation
—and how to best encourage human individuals to engage in that creation,
and thereby promote science and the useful arts—was thus central to
American copyright from its very inception. Non-human actors need no
incentivization with the promise of exclusive rights under United States
law, and copyright was therefore not designed to reach them

AI Art ≠ • Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 51/ Thursday, March 16, 2023 / Rules and R
egulations
... Based on the Office’s understanding of the generative AI technologies
currently available, users do not exercise ultimate creative control over how

Authorship
such systems interpret prompts and generate material. Instead, these prompts
function more like instructions to a commissioned artist they identify what the
prompter wishes to have depicted, but the machine determines how those
instructions are implemented in its output
One image-generating AI product describes prompts as ‘‘influencing’’ the
output but does not suggest the prompts dictate or control it. See Prompts,
Midjourney, https://docs.midjourney.com/ docs/prompts (explaining that short
text prompts cause ‘‘each word [to have] a more powerful influence’’ and that
images including in a prompt may ‘‘influence the style and content of the
finished result’’).
Generative • US Copyright Office, Re: Zarya of the Dawn
Copyright Registration
The fact that Midjourney’s specific output cannot be predicted by users

AI Art ≠
makes Midjourney different for copyright purposes than other tools used
by artists.
Like the photographer in Burrow-Giles, when artists use editing or other
assistive tools, they select what visual material to modify, choose which

Tool
tools to use and what changes to make, and take specific steps to control
the final image such that it amounts to the artist’s “own original mental
conception, to which [they] gave visible form.”
Users of Midjourney do not have comparable control over the initial
image generated, or any final image
 • Permohonan disetujui secara otomatis oleh sistem

Pendaftaran
Hak Cipta • Putusan 89/G/2021/PTUN-JKT

di Indonesia
“Takkala keputusan otomatis yang diproses dalam sistem
elektronik hanya disikapi secara taken for granted, tanpa
kesadaran adanya resiko kesalahan pengambilan keputusan
administrasi, fungsi administrasi publik otomatis seakan
dibiarkan tergantikan oleh mesin kecerdasan buatan
(artificial intelligence) atau sarana teknologi informasi lain,
maka prinsip dasar negara hukum menyangkut
pertanggung-jawaban setiap pengemban kewenangan
hukum akan terganggu pada titik yang paling fundamental
dan esensial;”
 • Pasal 1 angka 8 UU ITE
Agen Elektronik adalah perangkat dari suatu Sistem Elektronik yang dibuat

Dimana
untuk melakukan suatu tindakan terhadap suatu Informasi Elektronik tertentu
secara otomatis yang diselenggarakan oleh Orang.

• Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi Dan Informatika

Saja AI Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan

Artifisial
Penggunaan AI harus didasarkan pada etika dan kode etik yang berlaku.

Diatur?
Teknologi pemrograman berbasis AI digunakan untuk mendukung aktivitas
pekerjaan.
Fasilitas AI harus digunakan untuk meningkatkan kreativitas pengguna dalam
menyelesaikan masalah dan tugas.
Penyelenggaraan Kecerdasan Artifisial tunduk pada prinsip pelindungan Hak
Kekayaan Intelektual sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan
THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING