Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • ARGUMENTS AND PROPOSITIONS - Maniego

    Uploaded by

    ANNALYN CABATINGAN
    6 views8 pages
    The document outlines a process for determining the validity of arguments using truth tables. It explains that you construct a truth table for the premises and conclusion of an argument. You then check the critical rows where all premises are true and see if the conclusion is true in those rows. If so, the argument is valid. If the conclusion is false in any critical row, the argument is invalid. Examples are provided to demonstrate determining the validity of arguments using this process.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    ARGUMENTS AND PROPOSITIONS.maniego

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines a process for determining the validity of arguments using truth tables. It explains that you construct a truth table for the premises and conclusion of an argument. You then check the critical rows where all premises are true and see if the conclusion is true in those rows. If so, the argument is valid. If the conclusion is false in any critical row, the argument is invalid. Examples are provided to demonstrate determining the validity of arguments using this process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    6 views8 pages

    ARGUMENTS AND PROPOSITIONS - Maniego

    Uploaded by

    ANNALYN CABATINGAN
    The document outlines a process for determining the validity of arguments using truth tables. It explains that you construct a truth table for the premises and conclusion of an argument. You then check the critical rows where all premises are true and see if the conclusion is true in those rows. If so, the argument is valid. If the conclusion is false in any critical row, the argument is invalid. Examples are provided to demonstrate determining the validity of arguments using this process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    ARGUMENT

    S AND
    PROPOSITIO
    NS
    Construct Find the Check
    truth table rows in conclusion
    for the which all
    premises
    of all
    the premises
    and the are true. critical
    conclusion. (critical rows) rows.

    Our If the conclusion is If the conclusion is


    process is true in each critical false in each critical
    row, then the row, then the
    easy
    argument is VALID. argument is INVALID.
    ⊙ Determine
    the validity
    of each of
    the
    following
    arguments.
    ⊙ Determine
    the validity
    ( 𝐩∧ 𝐪 ) → 𝐫 of each of
    𝐩 ∧𝐪 the
    ∴𝐫 following
    arguments.
    ⊙ Determine
    the validity
    of each of
    the
    following
    arguments.
    ⊙ Determine
    the validity
    of each of
    the
    following
    arguments.
    ⊙ Determine
    the validity
    of each of
    If it fains, Jhay will be sick.
    the
    Jhay was not sick. following
    It did not rain. arguments.
    Thanks!
    😉
    ajm

    You might also like