The document discusses how power is becoming more diffuse due to factors like increased accountability, competition, participation of civil society, and decentralization of authority. This diffusion of power is creating greater demands on governments to manage competing interests and is leading to more participation in policymaking from a variety of public and private actors. Additionally, globalization and economic development are undermining traditional sources of power and leading to new networks and relationships between governments, businesses, organizations and other stakeholders in governance.
The document discusses how power is becoming more diffuse due to factors like increased accountability, competition, participation of civil society, and decentralization of authority. This diffusion of power is creating greater demands on governments to manage competing interests and is leading to more participation in policymaking from a variety of public and private actors. Additionally, globalization and economic development are undermining traditional sources of power and leading to new networks and relationships between governments, businesses, organizations and other stakeholders in governance.
The document discusses how power is becoming more diffuse due to factors like increased accountability, competition, participation of civil society, and decentralization of authority. This diffusion of power is creating greater demands on governments to manage competing interests and is leading to more participation in policymaking from a variety of public and private actors. Additionally, globalization and economic development are undermining traditional sources of power and leading to new networks and relationships between governments, businesses, organizations and other stakeholders in governance.
The document discusses how power is becoming more diffuse due to factors like increased accountability, competition, participation of civil society, and decentralization of authority. This diffusion of power is creating greater demands on governments to manage competing interests and is leading to more participation in policymaking from a variety of public and private actors. Additionally, globalization and economic development are undermining traditional sources of power and leading to new networks and relationships between governments, businesses, organizations and other stakeholders in governance.
The second theme explored in this This generates greater political
book is the diffusion of power demands on those in government. that would result from increased The management of competing accountability, competition societal interests between seeking participation and empowerment of greater accountability and civil society, and decentralization of transparency rent-seekers the locus authority. me aspects of complicates the task of governance. regulation are contracted out to In fact, the diffusion of power is the private sector. creating demands for greater participation in policymaking and implementation. Economic development leads to the involvement of multiple Tillah, in his study, notes that while actors or agents operating globalization does affect outside the scope of state state sovereignty through the authority. Open markets can lead administration of the affairs of the to the diffusion of political power. state, it is still the primary actor in Traditional sources of power are governance because of its influence, being undermined by the scope, and power. However, there is transformation of political a need to recognize the growing structures and hierarchies. In influence of the business sector and particular, the power of local civil society, and international. oligopolies and other concentrations of economic power may decline with the introduction of market-oriented policies. Globalization has made the governance is a multilevel, notion of networks more multistakeholder exercise of relevant. This has huge governing functions, where implications for the state that public policy results from now must learn to work and bargaining and negotiated manage these networks. agreements among different Internationalization has led to a actors in the policy arena. He “fragmented observes that the services policy-making arena, sector is composed of permeated by transnational interdependent, autonomous, networks as well and self-governing entities in as by domestic agencies and both the public and private forces (Held and McGrew 2003).” sector. Leading private sector They maintain good relations with organizations in Cebu City, such the local governments as the Cebu Chamber of in the area, and as a result they are Commerce and Industry, and allowed to concretely express which the Philippine Exporters policy direction the local Confederation in Cebu take part in proposing policies that would government should take to further enhance the development of develop the industry. These private the business industry in the sector organizations are able to city. According to Roldan, these work together with the local private sector organizations, authorities to protect themselves through their policy initiatives, against the adverse effects of are able to participate in the globalization and reap its benefits. growth and development. . This empowerment also means Iglesias explains that the use that private sector groups and of ICT can also help to civil society organizations can also aid the government in helping the facilitate communities adjust to these good governance by global changes that affect local compelling government areas. As such , governance no agencies to increase longer belongs to the government transparency and alone. In the case of Cebu, private accountability sector organizations worked together with the government to create policies that would allow people to reap the benefits of globalization