Innovations in Connection

Design and Structural Elements

Addressing Contemporary Challenges in DfD

JOHN MATHEW CYRIL JAMES RAJASEKARAN

SID:13889928
 ADOPTATION
• Introduction to the challenges faced by traditional design methods in
column, beam, and slab connections.
• Emphasis on the importance of exploring and adopting new design
approaches and technologies for improved structural performance.
 Research Aim and Objectives

Research Aim Research Objectives

• Investigate and implement
innovative design approaches and
technologies in the DfD of
column, beam, and slab
connections.
• Evaluate the applicability of new
design methods.
• Assess the potential of incorporating
emerging technologies.
• Investigate the impact on
construction costs and sustainability.
 Reasoning
• Discuss the reasons and reasoning for the research.
• Highlight how adopting new design methodologies and technologies
addresses current challenges and advances the field of connection design.
Research Methodology
• Summarize existing • Conduct laboratory
knowledge on experiments to assess
innovative design the performance of new
methods and emerging design approaches.
technologies in
connection design.

Literature Experimental
Review Testing

Computationa
Field Studies
l Analysis

• Utilize advanced • Conduct on-site studies

computational tools to to observe and evaluate
simulate and analyze the practical application
the behavior of of new design methods.
connections.
 Projected Outcomes
• Discuss anticipated results and contributions of the research.
• Highlight how findings will impact the field of connection design and
construction.
 Constraints and Considerations
• Acknowledge potential limitations and constraints of the research.
• Discuss how these factors might affect the scope and generalizability of
the study.
 Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages Disadvantages
• Improved structural performance. • Challenges in implementation.
• Enhanced sustainability. • Resistance to change in industry
• Potential cost savings. practices.
• Potential unforeseen
consequences
 Reference

• Martins, R., Ricardo do Carmo, Costa, H., & Júlio, E. (2021). Load bearing capacity of connections between innovative pre-walls designed to have high durability and eco-efficiency. Journal of Building

Engineering, 44, 103356–103356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103356

• Martins, R., Ricardo do Carmo, Costa, H., & Júlio, E. (2023). A review on precast structural concrete walls and connections. Advances in Structural Engineering.

https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332231191073

• Mehra, S., O’Ceallaigh, C., Sotayo, A., Guan, Z., & Harte, A. M. (2022). Experimental investigation of the moment-rotation behaviour of beam-column connections produced using compressed wood

connectors. Construction and Building Materials, 331, 127327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127327

• Ottenhaus, L.-M., Yan, Z., Brandner, R., Leardini, P., Fink, G., & Jockwer, R. (2023). Design for adaptability, disassembly and reuse – A review of reversible timber connection systems. Construction and

Building Materials, 400, 132823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132823

• Ricardo do Carmo, Martins, R., Arruda, M., Costa, H., Valente, D., Jónatas Valença, & Júlio, E. (2023). Reinforcement detailing of connections between perpendicular hollow precast walls. Advances in

Structural Engineering, 26(9), 1663–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332231175402