FRUIT RECEIVING MASTERPLAN

Interim Plan
July 2018
 Existing Lay-out
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B A X
2H* 2H* 2T* 2T* 2T* 2T 2T 2T 2T 2T 2T
1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T* 1T 1T
2T 2T
1T 1T
2T 2T
1T 1T
2T
1T 1T
2H 2H 2H
1T 1T 1T 1T
S1T S1T
1T 1T 1T
SS1T

2T* 1T*
2H*

2T 2T 1T 2H 1T SS1T

3
 Future Set-up (Distribution)
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B A X
SS1T

S1T
2T* 1T* 2T
1T

2H
2H*
2Q

Summary:

Max
Proposed
(Based on
normal
2T 2T 1T 2H 1T SS1T
distribution)

SS1T – 3 lines SS1T – 3 lines

S1T – >5 lines S1T – 3 lines

(12%)
1T – >17 lines 1T – 7 lines
4
 Future Set-up (F200)
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B A X
SS1T

S1T
2T* 1T* 2T
1T

2H
2H*
2Q
1
S S
S
2 2 1
2 T T 1
Q T
H T

2T 2T 1T 2H 1T SS1T
Pros: Able to feed 2H fruits at the top of distribution belt.
Cons:
1)Chlorine tank and its pipeline will be relocated.
2)1T high speed will be moved.
3) Fruit elevator from waterway cannot feed to direct feed due to 1T accumulator
, 1T high speed, & chlorine tank & its pipeline will be demolished.
5
 Future Set-up (MG3)
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B A X
SS1T

S1T
2T* 1T* 2T
1T

2H
2H*
2Q
2 2 1 S S
2 T T 1 S
H Q 1
T
T

2T 2T 1T 2H 1T SS1T
Pros:
1)Able to feed 1T or 2T fruits at the bottom of distribution belt.
2) less demolition works( only one control panel will be relocated)
3) Able to install fruit elevator from the waterway at 25deg inclination.
Cons:
1) Accumulator length not maximized.
6
F200 – 2H Direct Feeding

7
2T or 1T Direct Feeding

8
9
- Relocation of Live Turn Around Conveyor
- Relocation of Stairs
- Relocation of Panel Board
Outside Area
2T Waterway
13