Nba Obe Implementation

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 51

+

OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION


PHILOSOPHY
PEOs/POs/PSOs/COs,
Assessments & CQI
+ OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (OBE

PHILOSOPHY

03/14/2024 2
+ Mapping of COs, POs, PEOs &
3

Mission

COs

POs/PSOs
*
+
* * PEOs
+ + . Mission
* ..
.
* * +
* + +
+
* *
*
+ OBE Addresses Key
Questions...
 Who are our stakeholders?
 What services do we provide?
 What services, facilities and policies must be present?
 How do we measure our results?
 How do we use these results for CQI?
 Are we achieving our objectives and improving?
 Are our stakeholders satisfied?
+ Strategies to Implement OBE… 5

Course Content - Reviewing course content to suit specified Learning


Outcomes, industrial needs, job specifications, professional body
requirement (accreditation), etc.

Teaching-Learning Methods - Introducing innovative/flexible teaching


methods/delivery tools to develop PEO and PO in
students/graduates.

Assessment & Evaluation Tools - Introducing variety of assessment


and evaluation tools to measure the achievement of PEO and PO.

Data & Evidence Collection - Collecting evidences of process


Improvement and the achievement of the PEO and PO.

Working towards Continuous Quality Improvement


+ Characteristics of OBE curricula 6

 Ithas program educational objectives (PEO), program


outcomes (PO), course outcomes (CO) and
performance indicators (PI) through assessments
 Itis objective and outcome driven, where every stated
objective and outcomes can be assessed and
evaluated.
 Itis centered around the needs of the students and the
stakeholders.
+ Implementation of OBE 7

 Program Educational Objectives


 Program Outcomes
 Assessment Tools
 Assessment Planning
 Assessment Evaluation and Analysis
 CQI procedures
+ Role of Teachers
8

Review PEOs, POs, Course Structures and Syllabi.


• Teach the relevant engineering, maths and other
relevant subjects.
• Conduct relevant tutorials and laboratory practical
sessions.
• Give appropriate guide on assignments and projects.
• Conduct empirical measurements of POs.
• Prepare the required documentation.
• Ensure Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).
+ Role of Students
9

 Know the required POs and PEOs


• For each course, review the Learning Outcomes at the beginning
of each semester. This gives an idea of the knowledge and skills
expected from a particular course.
• Be more proactive in the learning process to acquire the Learning
Outcomes of subjects.
• Demonstrate through the assessment methods that the required
skills and knowledge have been acquired.
• Attain the PO and PEOs as a whole during the entire programme.
• Give constructive feedbacks on the programme/course/academic
staff.
+
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION

 What can you do now that you have obtained your


degree?” instead of
"what courses did you study to obtain your degree?”;

 OBE focuses on what the students are able to do at


the end of each course and at the end of the program.
+ Outcome Based Education
Engineering Education in OBE Frame work

03/14/2024 1
1
+ Practice of Outcome Based
Education
5 Questions for Instructional Design

1. What do you want the student to be able to do?


(Outcome)
2. What does the student need to know in order to do this
well? (Curriculum)
3. What activity will facilitate the learning? (Pedagogy -
learning & teaching)
4. How will the student demonstrate the learning?
(Assessment)
5. How will the teacher know the student has done this
well? (Criteria)

03/14/2024 1
2
+ CURRICULUM AND CO FRAMING

1. Identify all of the content, skills, behaviors and


thinking processes that you want the students to
learn.
2. Refine the list to include only those areas that are
most important (Competencies , skills, theoretical
knowledge, behaviors etc… )
3. For each competency identify the level
competency you want them have .You can use
Bloom taxonomy here to identify competency
level
4. Identify how they will show the competency ( this
will be helpful when you come to the
Assessment).

Repeat 1-4 to write COs 1


03/14/2024
3
+ COURSE OBJECTIVES & COURSE 14

OUTCOMES

 A program consists of number of theory, practical and


project courses.
 Each Course shall have a set of Course Objectives,
which describe what the teacher intends to teach and
are written from the teacher’s point of view.
 Course Outcomes are comprehensive sets of
statements of exactly what the students will be able to
do/achieve after the successful learning.
 Course Objectives and Course Outcomes are to be
framed by each teacher, at the beginning of the course.
+ COURSE OUTCOMES
15

 Course Outcomes (COs) are clear statements of what a


student should be able to demonstrate upon
completion of a course.
 knowledge, skills, abilities or attitudes that students
attain by the end of the course.
 They should be assessable and measurable
 It is generally a good idea to identify five to six
outcomes.

03/14/2024
+ Bloom's Revised
Taxonomy
+ CASE STUDY DIGITAL ELECTRONICS

At the end of the course students will be able to:


• Use digital electronics in the present contemporary world
• Design various combinational digital circuits using logic gates
• Do the analysis and design procedures for synchronous and
asynchronous sequential circuits Use the semiconductor
memories and related technology
• Use electronic circuits involved in the design of logic gates

1. There is no mapping for PO6,PO7,PO8,PO11


2. There is low mapping for PO3,PO9,PO10,PO12

03/14/2024 1
7
+ PROGRAM OUTCOMES
+ PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Benefits of OBE
+ 20

 More directed & coherent curriculum.


 Graduateswill be more “relevant” to industry & other
professions
 Stakeholders will be more satisfied
 Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is in place.
 International recognition
+ OBE – CQI Process
Assessment

Assessment

Assessment

A A A
Vision Learning n n n
Program
& PEO Outcomes Outcomes a a a
Mission of Subject l l l
y y y
s s s
i i i
CQI
s s s

CQI
CQI 21
+ COURSE OUTCOMES

 Batch: 2014-2018 Course Code: C312

 Course: VLSI Design Upon completion of this course, the Students


will be able to:
Course
Code Course Outcomes
Analyze the basic CMOS circuits and CMOS process
C312.1 technology.
Contrast combinational logic circuit design and low power
C312.2 design.
Summarize sequential circuit design and low power
C312.3 memory design.
C312.4 Construct arithmetic building blocks.
Evaluate various chip design techniques and FPGA
C312.5 architecture.
+ CO- PO MAPPING

 Batch: 2014-2018 Course Code: C312

 Course: VLSI Design Upon completion of this course, the Students will be
able to:
COURS PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
E CODE

C312.1 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 3

C312.2 3 2 1 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 3

C312.3 3 3 2 2 - - - - - - - 2 1 3

C312.4 3 2 2 2 - - - - - - - 2 1 3

C312.5 3 3 2 2 - - - - - - - 2 1 3

C312 3.00 2.40 1.60 1.60 - - - - - - - 1.60 1.00 3.00


+ CO – PO & PSO
MAPPING JUSTIFICATION
+ CO & PO Assessments

ASSESMENT TOOL FREQUENCY


 Direct Assessment
 Assignment
 Series Test Semester Wise
 University Examinations

 Project Work
 Co – Curricular Year wise
 Extra Curricular
 Indirect Assessment
 CO assessment Semester Wise
Course Survey

 PO Assessment
Exit Survey
Alumni survey Year wise
Employer Survey
+
CO & PO Assessments

 Course Outcome Assessment process:

 The CO assessment for each course is done by


individual faculty member and assessed by the
Academic Coordinator at the end of the semester. The
assessment process has two following methods:

 Direct Assessment Method


 Indirect Assessment Method
+ CO/PO ASSESMENT
Direct Assessment Method
Evaluation Procedure:

Theory Courses

Direct Assessment Method: Internal Assessment:

Class average for each test, assignments, seminars, Project review &
attendance may be calculated (As per the requirement of selected
assesment tools of the institutions) and target for attainment level is set
based on the class average:

The attainment level and target levels of each course may be fixed as
follows:

Attainment Level = 1, if 60% of students secured more than 50% Marks

Attainment Level = 2, if 70% of students secured more than 50% Marks

Attainment Level = 3, if 80% of students secured more than 50% Marks


+ CO/PO ASSESMENT
Direct Assessment Method
Direct Assessment Method: University Exams:
The attainment level and target levels of each course are fixed as
follows:
Attainment Level = 1, if 40% of students secured more than E Grade
Attainment Level = 2, if 50% of students secured more than E Grade
Attainment Level = 3, if 60% of students secured more than E Grade
Overall CO attainment:
Attainment Level through Direct Assessment=
(0.80x Attainment level based on University Exams
Examination marks) +(0.20 x Attainment level based on Internal
marks)

+
+
Direct Assessment Tools
+
Question paper with
CO/Knowledge level
+
CO-wise sample evaluation
sheet
+ CO ASSESMENT
+ CO ATTAINMENT
+ CO ASSESSMENT
+ PO & PSO ASSESMENT

PO ATTAINMENT-

CO VS PO AVERAGE * CO ATTAINMENT

MAXIMUM ATTAINMENT
PO ASSESSMENT 1 – 5 & PSO
+
PROGRAM OUTCOMES – 1 to 5 & PSO ASSESSMENT
+

S.N Assessmen Courses / Activities/ Overall Assessment Contribution


o t methods Contributing to PO Assessment Weightage

1 Direct C101-C118 (18) 2.68 60% 1.61


C201-C216(16)
C301-C316(16)
C402-C413(12)

2 Direct Project Assessment 2.80 20% 0.56


(C414)
3 Indirect Exit Feedback 2.80 05% 0.14
4 Indirect Alumni Feedback 2.40 10% 0.12
5 Indirect Feedback from 2.20 05% 0.11
Industries
Overall PO Attainment (on a scale of 3) 2.66
PROGRAM OUTCOMES – ASSESSMENTS & CQI
PROGRAM OUTCOMES – 1 to 5 & PSO ASSESSMENT
+
+ PO ASSESSMENT 6 – 12 & PSO
+ PROGRAM OUTCOMES – 6 to 12 PSO ASSESSMENT

S.N Assessment Courses / Activities/ Overall Assessment


Contribution
o methods Contributing to PO Assessment Weightage

C102, C105,C111
1 Direct C113,C114,C116 1.78 40% 0.71
C309,C403,C408,
C409

2 Direct Project Assessment 2.80 20% 0.56


(C414)
Co/Extra –curricular
NSS Activities
3. Direct Program on Ethics, 2.25 20% 0.45
Environment &
Sustainability, IPR,
Societal relevant activities
3 Indirect Exit Feedback 2.80 05% 0.14
4 Indirect Alumni Feedback 2.40 10% 0.12
5 Indirect Feedback from Industries 2.20 05% 0.11
Overall PO Attainment (on a scale of 3) 2.66
+ PROGRAM OUTCOMES – 6 to 12 & PSO
ASSESSMENT
+
CO/Extra curricular Assesment
+
CO/Extra curricular Assesment
+ PROGRAM EXIT SURVEY
+ PROGRAM EXIT SURVEY
+ EMPLOYER SURVEY
+ ALUMNISURVEY
+ ALUMNI SURVEY
+ INDIRECT SURVEY PO & PSO
ATTAINMENT
+ OVERALL PO & PSO ATTAINMENT
+

You might also like