Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Metal Forming 1 & 2
2 Metal Forming 1 & 2
2 Metal Forming 1 & 2
The flow stress of the material will be a strong function of strain, strain rate, and temperature.
The friction along this interface and the heat transfer from the workpiece to the die are
important considerations, as are such practical concerns as tool wear and surface finish of the
product.
Mechanics of Metalworking
The analysis of the stresses in metalworking processes has been an active area of
applied plasticity. Since the forces and deformations generally are quite complex,
it is usually useful to use simplifying assumptions to obtain a tractable solution.
Because the strains involved in deformation processes are large, it is usually
possible to neglect elastic strains and consider only the plastic strains (plastic-
rigid solid).
The principal use of analytical studies of metalworking processes is for
determining the forces required to produce a given deformation for a certain
geometry prescribed by the process. A mechanics analysis of a process may also
be used to develop information on the frictional conditions in the process. An
important problem area is predicting the limiting deformation at which fracture
will occur.
Metal working occurs due to plastic deformation which is associated with
analysis of complex stress distribution- require simplification.
Only (large) plastic strain is considered while elastic strain is very small and can be
neglected.
Strain hardening is often neglected. Metal is considered to be isotropic and
homogeneous.
Normally plastic deformation is not uniform and also has frictions, but we need to
simplify the stress analysis in order to determine the force required to produce a given
amount of deformation to obtain a product in a required geometry.
Relating stress and strain in elastic deformation
1. Expressing stress and strain at a point
2. Relating stress and strain in a solid that obeys
Hooke’s law
Simplification can be done by assuming the areas of the faces of the unit cube are
small enough so that the change in stress over the face is negligible.
Therefore τXY =τYX; τXZ =τZX; τYZ=τZY (take summation of moments about each axis)
Equilibrium equations
Assume non-homogeneous condition for the force system shown and by
considering equilibrium conditions along each axes, we can get equilibrium
equations as shown below.
State of stress in three dimensions
The system shown is in equilibrium and forces acting on each of its
faces must balance.
Along X-axis,
σAl = σx Al + τyx Am + τzx An ⇒(σ–σx) l - τyxm –τzx n = 0
Similarly,
-τxy l + (σ- σy) m – τzy n = 0 (along Y axis) ;
Also, we have assumed isotropic nature in the elastic deformation. Anisotropy of elastic
deformation is possible. Since elastic part is small during metal deformation.
Plastic deformation
Important points to remember in plastic deformation
- Hooke’s law is not valid in plastic deformation
- Irreversible process – material will not come back to its original
dimension
- Plastic strain depends on the loading path by which final state is
achieved (elastic deformation depends on initial and final states). There is
no easily measured constant relating stress and strain in plastic
deformation region, unlike elastic deformation region
- Important phenomenon ‘STRAIN HARDENING’ has to be addressed in
this regime - Plastic anisotropy, Bauschinger effects are important- Criteria for
yielding has to be developed.
Unloading at A, stress decreases with strain parallel to elastic regime & upon
reloading curve bend over and reaches A, after which it takes the original
shape of stress-strain curve.
The true stress-strain curve is called as Flow curve and the eqn. that describes
the curve is called Flow equation. Generally the flow equations are empirical,
fit equations.
For eg., Hollomon’s equation, σ=Kεn where ‘σ’ is the true stress for
particular true strain ‘ε’, ‘K’ is the strength coefficient, ‘n’ is the strain
hardening exponent is a flow equation.
It should be noted that this eqn. is valid from onset of plastic
deformation to maximum load at which necking starts.
Relating engineering and true quantities
Dimensions of the specimen change with deformation; hence true quantities are better indicator of
forming than engineering quantities. Engg. quantities depend on the original dimensions of the
sample unlike true quantities. True strain, ε = ln (L/L0) Engg. strain, e = Δ L/L0 = (L-L0)/L0 = (L/L0)
– 1 => 1+e = L/L0
Hence, ε= ln (1+e) (This equation is valid up to maximum load and invalid after that point. This is because
of localization of neck after which the gage strain cannot be referred for measurement); ε = ln (L/L0) is
always useful.
=> Remember volume of solid remains constant during plastic deformation.
Hence εx + εy + εz = ε1 + ε2 + ε3 = 0 during plastic deformation. => This is not true in elastic deformation
regime i.e., Δ = ex + ey + ez = (1-2γ)/E [σx + σy + σz]; Δ will be zero only if γ = 1/2.
True stress, σ = Load / Instantaneous cross-section area = P/A
Engineering stress, S = Load / Initial cross-section area = P/A0
σ = P/A = (P/A0) (A0/A) = S (1+e); where A0/A = L/L0 = volume constancy principle
Strain hardening After yield point, further plastic deformation requires an increasing load but at
decreasing rate. Work hardening strengthens the material, but at the same time area of cross-section is
decreasing. The combined effect of these two phenomenon results in typical load-progression curve.
From yield point to ultimate load, work hardening is dominant. At ultimate load, condition of tensile
instability occurs. Till the ultimate load, deformation of sample gage length is uniform.
Necking–a local constriction begins along the gage section. From this point, incompatibility between
strain hardening and area decrease arises. As a result, the load required for further progression
decreases. This means that load carrying capacity of the sample decreases. After this, practically all
plastic deformation is concentrated in the small necked region. Finally, failure occurs in the necked
region.
If the true stress-strain plot is non-linear, it shows that material does not truly obey the Hollomon’s
eqn. and ‘n’ is not a constant. In this case, generally, ‘n’ will be defined w.r.t. strain.
Strain hardening exponent, n = d (lnσ)/d (lnε)
Physical restrictions of the hardening law:
Eqn. is valid between strain of 0.04 and strain at which necking begins. Predicting yield
strength using this eqn. should be avoided. Offset method has to be followed => For eg.,
Yield Strength = K (0.002)n is incorrect. Exclusion of elastic and transition regions leads to
little error.
Yield function
Yield function defines yield surface. Assume that yield surface is closed, smooth surface. At
any instant of time, yield surface is defined as f (σij) = f (σ11, σ22, σ33, σ23, σ13, σ12) = k => This is
6-D surface with each dimension represent one of the stress components. Assume isotropic
material – same properties in all directions; In this case, we can write in terms of principal
stresses only σ1, σ2, σ3 and surface is reduced to 3-D. We need cubic eqn. to relate these stresses
to principal stresses, σ3 – I1σ2 – I2σ – I3 = 0.
The stress invariants are related to principal stresses, I 1 = σ1 + σ2 + σ3;
I2 = - (σ1σ2 + σ2σ3 + σ1σ3); I3 = σ1σ2σ3
With isotropic assumption, we can write k = f (I1, I2, I3) or k = f (σ1, σ2, σ3); First assumption k = f (I 1, I2, I3). Plastic
deformation is pressure independent => Solids under hydrostatic pressure do not deform
plastically. Consider principal stress terms that differ by a pressure term
σ1 => σ1’= σ1 + p/3; σ2 => σ2’ = σ2 + p/3; σ3 => σ3’ = σ3 + p/3
Here hydrostatic pressure = - (σ1+σ2+σ3)/3
Now, σ1’=σ1 –(σ1+σ2+σ3)/3; σ2’=σ2 –(σ1+σ2+σ3)/3; σ3’=σ3 –(σ1+σ2+σ3)/3
It is clear that σi’ is nothing but stress deviatoric components as defined earlier. We can write
yield function in terms of deviatoric components to avoid pressure dependence, i.e., Isotropic,
pressure independent: f (I2’, I3’). Here I1’ = 0 because σ1’+ σ2’+ σ3’ = 0. Now we have reduced
yield surface to a function of two variables, I 2’ & I3’
Effect of temperature in metal forming:
Forming process requires stress above flow stress of the material being deformed. The effect of
external work done on work piece during forming is converted into heat. About 5 to 10% of the
work is stored within as internal energy. Friction can also result in heating and increase in
internal energy of workpiece. Assuming frictionless deformation, the temperature increases
during metal forming operation can be written as:
ΔT = uplastic/ρCp, where uplastic is plastic work done per unit volume of work piece. C pis specific heat and
ρ is density.
With friction,
ΔT = λutotal / ρCp, where λ is fraction of deformation work converted to heat. Normally, λ = 0.95 to
0.98.
Temperature rise is calculated using stress-strain curve, as the plastic work is calculated as the area
under stress-strain curve for plastic flow. For slow deformations, the temperature rise of the work piece
may be small as the heat generated gets dissipated through the die, surrounding air, etc. However,
adiabatic condition may prevail under large deformation speeds, resulting in large rise in temperature
of the work piece. This may cause incipient melting. Therefore, strain rate also influences the
temperature rise during working. For low carbon steel, the temperature rises for a true strain of 1 has
been estimated to be 553 K. This is without heat lost from the billet.
Cold and hot forming:
Cold forming is carried-out at a temperature lower than recrystallization temperature of the work piece material.
Hot working is a process carried out at temperatures above recrystallization temperature, namely, 0.6 T m. High
strain rates – 0.5 to 500 s-1are involved in hot working. No strain hardening takes place in hot working. Processes of
recrystallization, recovery and grain growth dominate in hot working. Energy required for hot working is low, as
flow stress decreases with increase in temperature. Large strains (ε = 2 to 4) are possible in hot forming because of
recovery process. Due to oxidation on surface during hot working, poor surface finish and poor dimensional
tolerances are inherent defects. Die wall chilling may result in non-uniform material flow. Upper limit for hot
working is hot shortness, in which the metal becomes brittle above a certain temperature due to grain boundary
melting or melting of low melting phase such as sulfur in steel.
Metals with high thermal conductivity will require higher working temperatures or rapid working.
During hot working, material softening happens due to two mechanisms – dynamic recovery or dynamic
recrystallization. In dynamic recovery, dislocation cross-slipping, climbing occurs. This mechanism is predominant
in high stacking fault energy metals, with low activation energy for creep. On the other hand, for metals with low
stacking fault energy, like copper, nickel, the dynamic recrystallization is predominant mechanism of softening.
During hot working static recovery can happen in between the working phases, thereby softening the metal. Rapid
cooling after hot working may bypass this static recovery, thereby retaining the high strength of the metal. Strain
induced precipitation or phase transformation can increase the flow stress, reduce ductility. Age hardenable (Al)
alloys are subjected to freezing temperatures before forming, to suppress precipitation during forming. Thermo
mechanical treatments can be used for achieving optimum levels of strength and hardness. Cold working leads to
work hardening. The formed material may have to be annealed to relieve internal stresses and reduce hardness and
strength after cold forming. However, if high strength and hardness are desirable, normally cold worked structure is
retained. Cold working has high dimensional accuracy. Working on a metal at temperatures above room
temperature but below recrystallization temperature is called warm working. Warm working may have the
advantages of reduced working pressures, reduced levels of residual stresses and oxidation, improved surface finish
and dimensional accuracy.
Analysis of forming - Slab Method
Forming of materials is a complex process, involving either biaxial or triaxial state of stress on the material
being formed. Analysis of the forming process therefore is highly involved. Prediction of forming load in a
particular process is rather empirical. However, fairly accurate methods have been developed in order to
predict the forming process and process parameters. Some of the early methods of forming analysis include
slab analysis; slip line field analysis, upper bound analysis etc. With the availability of high-speed computers,
we can depend on finite element method for accurate predictions of forming loads. Numerous metals forming
software have been developed based on finite element procedures for complex shapes with more realistic
boundary conditions.
Slab method is a simple analytical procedure based on principles of mechanics. We can assume a simple
relation between forming load and material flow stress in the form: F = kA, where k is an empirically
determined constant which takes into account friction, redundant deformation etc.
The general methodology involved in slab method can be stated as follows:
First the material under deformation is sliced into infinitesimally small portions. Then force balance is made
on the small element. From force balance a differential equation in terms of the forming stress, geometric
parameters of the billet and friction coefficient is formulated. This differential equation is solved with suitable
boundary conditions. The solution gives us the required forming stress. This method may involve some
simplifying assumptions. Hence this method may be considered approximate. Moreover, it may not be easy to
apply this method for more complex forming processes, such as impression die forging. Slab method is
developed with the assumption that the material flow is homogeneous during forming.