Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ETIC111 - Midterm Lecture 2
ETIC111 - Midterm Lecture 2
CATHOLIC MORALITY
CATHOLIC MORALITY
The END
(INTENTION/MOTIVE)
DOES NOT
Justify the
MEANS (ACTION)
UTILITARIAN MORALITY
The END
(INTENTION/MOTIVE)
JUSTIFIES the
MEANS (ACTION)
Review:
What is the difference between:
HUMAN ACTS
AND
ACTS OFMAN
3 ELEMENTS
OF
HUMAN ACTS
1. Means or Action
2. End/Intention or Motive
3. Circumstances
1.MEANS/ 2.END/OBJECT(MOTIVE)
ACTION /INTENTION RESULT
Circumstances:
3.WHO – NAME/ AGE/M or F
4.WHERE- PLACE/LOCATION
5.WHEN- TIME/DAY
6.HOW(in what manner)
‘Principle of Double-Effect’.
Case:Pregnant Woman who has a cancer
in the uterus
Action: Removal of the uterus
- Is it natural to be homosexual?
Aquinas said that the moral life is the life which is lived according
to reason.
● Based on Aquinas understanding acts such as homosexuality,
use of contraception and masturbation are all immoral
actions.
● The ideal purpose of sex is for reproduction within the confines
of marriage. Any sexual act contrary to this is considered
'unnatural' and therefore immoral.
● The Catholic Church has established its doctrines on the
basis of Aquinas' natural law and that is why the Catholic
Church today maintains a strict adherence to the belief that
Homosexulaity. contraception, abortion, masturbation or
any other sexual act not aimed at procreation is unnatural,
sinful and therefore immoral.
●Aquinas then goes on to say that there is our
human nature, common with other animals, a
desire that has to do with sexual intercourse and
the care of one’s offspring.
●As a matter of fact, animals periodically engage
in sexual intercourse at a specific time of “heat”,
and this could result an offspring. In human
beings, too, that natural inclination to engage in
the sexual act and to reproduce exists.
Background:
The Catholic Church's stance on contraception is a prominent example
of how natural law principles are applied and debated.
Catholic teaching, influenced by natural law, upholds the sanctity of life,
procreation, and the marital act.
They say that when people want to have children, they shouldn't
use certain tools, like condoms or pills, to prevent babies from
being born. They believe this goes against the natural order of
things.
They want people to use natural methods, like tracking a woman's
fertility, to plan when to have children.
Catholic Natural Law Principles at Play:
Same Sex Marriage is deemed immoral as it goes against the natural order of things.
Heteronormative Understanding:
Divine Law (Below Eternal Law): Divine law is derived from eternal law and represents
specific commands and guidance given by God to human beings. It includes religious
scriptures, commandments, and teachings that shape religious morality.
Natural Law (Below Divine Law): Natural law is the moral and ethical principles derived from
the rational understanding of eternal and divine law. It is accessible to human reason and
conscience and serves as a guide for human behavior in harmony with the divine order.
Human or Positive Law (Lowest Tier): Human or positive law represents laws created by
human societies, governments, and legal systems. These laws are based on natural law
principles but can vary from one society to another. They are man-made and intended to
regulate specific societal issues.
What will the Natural law theorists choose?
What will the Natural law theorists choose?
CASE STUDY
A prominent and much-loved leader has been rushed to the hospital,
grievously wounded by an assassin's bullet. He needs a heart and lung
transplant immediately to survive. No suitable donors are available, but
there is a homeless person in the emergency room who is being kept
alive on a respirator, who probably has only a few days to live, and who
is a perfect donor.
Without the transplant, the leader will die; the homeless person will die
in a few days, anyway. Security at the hospital is very well controlled.
The transplant team could hasten the death of the homeless person and
carry out the transplant without the public ever knowing that they killed
the homeless person for his organs.
What will the Natural law theorists choose?
Activity: Case Study
● You are a passenger on a ship sailing across the
ocean. Suddenly, your ship is overtaken in a powerful
storm. You escape to a lifeboat with 25 other
passengers. You notice that four of the passengers are
badly injured, and unlikely to survive for more than a
week. You also know that the lifeboat only has enough
food and water to sustain 22 passengers.
● Some of the other passengers are considering
throwing the four injured passengers overboard in
order to save the other survivors.
● If you were a natural law theorist, how would you solve
this ethical dilemma?
Justify your answer
BASED on NATURAL
LAW theory