Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxation 388, Chapter 3 Gross Income, 2023, Student
Taxation 388, Chapter 3 Gross Income, 2023, Student
Taxation 388, Chapter 3 Gross Income, 2023, Student
TAXATION 388
2023
SILKE: CHAPTER 3
GROSS INCOME
Class Preparation
• Read Chapter 3 of SILKE
• Create your own summaries
• Download the following interpretation notes from: https://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/legal-
advisory/interpretation-notes/
o Interpretation note 3 (issue 2) – Ordinarily resident
o Interpretation note 4 (issue 5) – Physical presence test
The lecturer will lead and facilitate the class discussion of the prescribed material. The lecturer will
assume that students have worked through the relevant chapter prior to the lecture and the class
discussion will proceed from this basis.
Caveat
This PowerPoint presentation is the lecturer’s teaching aid and is made available to better
facilitate classroom activities, it does not replace your prescribed course material (textbook
and the Act). This presentation must not be treated as a summary of the prescribed work.
Note that: all section references in these class notes refer to the Income Tax Act, unless
specifically stated otherwise.
Marks will only be awarded for principles from cases when
relevant to a discussion (context).
Focus on general
definition
3.1 The definition of ‘gross income’ [s1(1)]
• Starting point for calculating taxable income of a person
• Defined in section 1(1) of the Act
• Included in gross income = General definition + special inclusions (see Chapter 4)
• Different for (i) “residents” and (ii) “non-residents”
Every single one of these requirements must be met before an amount will qualify
as ‘gross income’
3.2 Determine if taxpayer is a resident or non-resident
• s 1(1) definition of ‘resident’
• Different for natural persons and persons other than natural persons
DTA
Non-resident Resident
Incorporated, Place of
Ordinarily Physical
established, effective
resident test presence test
formed management
Section 1 – Resident definition
NB!!
Definition analysis:
• Paragraph (a) & (b)
• Par (a) → Subparagraph (i) or (ii)
• Subparagraph (ii) → item (aa) & (bb)
• “Provided” / Proviso: Provide further
Par (a)(ii) ONLY if explanation & possible changing of the rules
Read & not at ANY time in • 1st proviso applicable to subparagraph (ii)
understand YOA meet par (a)(i) • 2nd proviso applicable to whole definition
3.2.1 Residence of natural persons [par (a)(i) of the definition of ‘resident’ in s1(1)]
Case Principle
Cohen v CIR 1. Country to which a person will naturally and
as a matter of course return to = ‘usual’ or
‘principal’ residence
Taxpayer’s employer requests 2. Focus not only on the current YoA = look at
Ordi that taxpayer work for 20 person’s life outside the current YoA as well
naril months in New York 3. Physical absence is not decisive
y
resi
dent
CIR v Kuttel • Place where person normally resides apart
Taxpayer moves to New York to from occasional or temporary absences
open office. Receives permanent (‘real home’)
residence permit and builds life
there.
What factors does SARS consider in determining whether a taxpayer is ordinarily resident or
not?
-Refer to Interpretation Note No. 3 (issue 2)
-Examples:
Most fixed and settled place of residence, habitual abode, place of business and personal
interest, status in country, location of personal belongings, nationality, family and social
relations, political and cultural activities, period aboard, purpose and nature of visits aboard,
frequency and reasons for visits.
NB!!
Read &
understand
Beginning and ending of residency under ordinarily resident test
Section 9H
Act?
Practice?
See slide
14
3.2.3 What happens when a taxpayer emigrates from RSA?
Emigrates
Resident Non-Resident
Immigrates
Non-resident Resident
Physical presence test (slide 11) – person is not at any time ordinarily resident
in current YOA
3 Requirements:
Physically present in RSA for a period or periods
1. Exceeding 91 days in aggregate during the current YoA (thus 2023 YoA)
2. Exceeding 91 days in aggregate during each of the 5 preceding YoA (thus 2022
– 2018 YoA)
3. Exceeding 915 days in aggregate during the 5 preceding YoA (thus 2022 – 2018
YoA > 915 days)
Provisos:
• Part of a day = whole day
• Day in transit through RSA = not included, provided that person does not enter
through customs point
• >91 and >915 days need not be continuous
• If a person is a resident i.t.o. the PP test, but is then outside RSA for ≥ 330 full
continuous days, the person is deemed not to be a resident
What would the implications for residency be if the taxpayer flew from RSA to Croatia
on 1 June 2022, and remained physically outside South Africa up to and including 15
May 2023?
3.2.2 Residence of persons other than natural persons [par(b) of the definition of
‘resident’ in s1(1)]
Every single one of these requirements must be met before an amount will qualify
as ‘gross income’
3.3 Meaning of ‘total amount in cash or otherwise’
Case Principle
Every single one of these requirements must be met before an amount will qualify
as ‘gross income’
3.4.1 Meaning of ‘received by’
Case Principle
Geldenhuys An amount is only ‘received’ by the taxpayer, if it is
received
Wife only has usufruct, sells sheep
of heirs. Wife not entitled to • on his own behalf and
proceeds, the heirs are. • for his own benefit
ITC 1918 (2019) (81 SATC 267) • Gift card receipts are not for taxpayer’s own
Retailer in clothes and other benefit, but for the gift card holder’s
merchandise ‘sells’ gift cards
Leave for Tax 388 • Included in taxpayer’s GI on the earliest of:
When is it GI? 1. Redeemed by the gift card holder
2. Date on which gift card expires
3.4.1 Meaning of ‘received by’ - Illegal income
Self study
Case Principle
Delagoa Bay Cigarette • Illegal receipts may also constitute ‘gross
income’
Taxpayer ran an illegal lottery. • For income tax purposes it does not matter if a
Cigarettes sold at higher price, transaction is legal or not.
difference was prize money
(given to holder of a lucky
coupon)
MP Finance Group • Illegal receipts may also constitute ‘gross
income’ if the taxpayer intended to receive the
amount for his or her own benefit.
Illegal pyramid scheme =
taxpayer’s intention was to use
deposits for own benefit. • The issue is not whether the victim intended to
part with the money, but rather whether the thief
intended to benefit from it
Case Principle
• Value of amount that has accrued, but has not been received at YE
• Face value vs present value?
Must have an
ascertainable
money value
On his own
Received behalf and for
his own
by benefit
Deposits are GI
unless deposited
in separate trust
account
Illegal income is
gross income
Accrued Entitled to
payment
to
Unconditionally
entitled to
payment
Disposal of
income: does
accrual
• Inclusion in gross income: earliest of receipt or happens before
accrual or after
• Which ever takes place 1st disposal?
• Can be on the same date or on different dates
Lecture 3
Concepts of the ‘gross income’
definition in s 1(1)
(i) Resident (ii) Non-resident
1. Total amount, in cash or otherwise 1. Total amount, in cash or otherwise
2. Received by; accrued to; or in favour 2. Received by; accrued to; or in favour
of the resident of a non-resident
3. During the YoA 3. During the YoA
4. From a source within / deemed to be
within RSA Chap 21
4. Excluding amounts of a capital 5. Excluding amounts of a capital
nature nature
Every single one of these requirements must be met before an amount will qualify
as ‘gross income’
3.6 Receipts and accruals of a capital nature
• What does capital in nature mean? Difficult: what is capital in nature in the hands of
one taxpayer may be income in nature in the hands of another taxpayer
• Not defined in the Act (case law provide guidelines). No single or all-embracing test
exists
A portion of receipts of a capital in nature may possibly be taxed as taxable capital
gain – Chapter 17
Case Principle
Trust administer share purchase scheme to the benefit of PnP employees. Trust buys shares
to sell them to employees. Is the sale of shares to employees’ capital or income of nature?
Capital in nature?
Nature of Asset
Capital
Income
Case Principle
Stott • The intention of the taxpayer at date of
Taxpayer is a surveyor & acquisition is important, unless intention
architect that sometimes buys changed prior to sale and factors indicate that it
land if he has funds to invest. was sold in a scheme of profit making.
Subdivides big piece of land
into plots -> sells plots • A taxpayer is entitled to realise an asset to his
best advantage without it being considered a
change in intention.
Levy
Taxpayer sells shares in a • If TP has mixed intentions seek and give effect
company that would have to main or dominant intention
developed land. Only wanted to
receive a good income from
selling the shares.
3.6.8 Receipts and accruals of a capital nature (continued)
Case Principle
• Taxpayer inherits listed shares and expands portfolio with surplus funds = Purpose was
dividend income = Capital in nature
• Sells some shares to invest in interest-bearing investment to have cash resources = change
to trading stock = Income in nature
• Income from sale > dividend income
3.6.6 Receipts and accruals of a capital nature (continued)
Change in intention
Case Principle
John Bell • The mere fact that a taxpayer sells his capital
asset at a profit does not per se make the profit
income in nature, something more is needed
Self study – repetition
of principles which
• Taxpayer is entitled to realise asset to his best
we already discussed advantage without it being considered a change in
intention.
Textile business moves from • Taxpayer must enter into scheme to sell assets for
premises -> decides to sell old a profit and use the assets as trading stock for the
premises. Rents out premises until intention to change
property market improves
Case Principle
Nature of taxpayer:
• If TP’s business or profession is a corollary of the nature of the asset (real estate
developer sells land)
• Personal factors: knowledge, expertise or lack thereof, age, health (mine options
acquired (Visser case) / selling shares when taxpayer turns 60 (Nussbaum
case))
Period of ownership:
• Long period – inference: capital in nature – unless indication of change in intention.
• Short period – inference: income in nature (trading stock) – unless convincing
reason for sale
Extra CONSIDERATIONS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT:
Capital vs Income in nature (consider actual facts of the
scenario and all case law principles, not only one factor)
Financing method:
• Larger amount borrowed – possible inference: capital in nature (mortgage on property
– use rental income to finance interest and installment on mortgage)
3.6.12 Closure of business & Sales contract for trading business should indicate (1) Trading
Goodwill stock (I), (2) Business assets (C), (3) Fixed amount GW (C)
3.6.14 Debts & • Buy debt with intention of collecting @ profit (I)
loans • Sell business with debtors book (C)
• Buy GC with debt and amount collected > than payment (C)
3.6.18 Interest
Received from loan or investment (I)
3.6.19 Restraints of trade Can’t practice profession in certain area for a certain
time → can’t generate income (C)