Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poster ACE-X2010
Poster ACE-X2010
Figure 3 – Streamline of heavy oil to different sand concentrations and different hydrocyclone overflow diameter.
(b)
(a)
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Np
Continuity equation:
t
f f U SMS
1
Momentum equation:
f U f U U S M f p
t
NP
f U U U U
T
1
Interphase drag force, that acts in the direction 3 CD
opposing the relative flow between the phases, C D M f U U U U
4 d
was adopted equal 0.44 :
Figure 5 – Sand volume fraction to different feed sand Figure 6 – Oil volume fraction to different feed sand
It was adopted the SSG Stress Reynolds Model as turbelence model. concentrations. concentrations.
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
• Uniform velocity and volume fraction of water , heavy oil and sand at the inlet surface;
u w = u o = 20 m/s; v w = v o = w w = w o = 0; f s 0.01; 0.05; 0.10; 0.15 and 0.20
f w = 1- f s - f o and f o = 0.2
• Uniform pressure at the overflow and underflow outlet surfaces equal to 101325 Pa;
• No slip at solid/fluid interface.
• Oil drop size was assumed equal to 100µm and 10µm to sand particle size. The physical
proprieties of the phases (water, oil and sand) used in the simulations are illustrated in the
Figure 7– Effects of solid concentration on Figure 8 – Effects of solid concentration on
Table 1. hydrocyclone performance (underflow separation hydrocyclone performance (overflow separation
Table 1- Physical properties of water and heavy oil efficiency). efficiency).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Figure 9– Effect of hydrocyclone overflow diameter on Figure 10 – Effect of hydrocyclone overflow diameter
underflow separation efficiency. on overflow separation efficiency
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Figure 2 – Streamline of sand to different sand concentrations and different hydrocyclone overflow diameter.