Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse
Walkway Collapse
July 17, 1981
Content Outline
01 Engineering Ethics
02 Unveiling the Tragedy
03 Structural Betrayal
04 Silent Sufferers
05 Identifying Accountability
06 Ethics Breach in Engineering
07 Legal Consequences and Accountability
08 Preventive Measures
09 Overcoming Adversity
Ethical Pillars in Engineering Excellence
In engineering, ethical guidelines are essential cornerstones, guiding professionals to prioritize
safety, honesty, and the greater good. The ASME Code of Ethics and the IEEE Code of Ethics
stand out as globally acknowledged standards, forming the bedrock of engineering excellence.
Deaths 114
Injured 216
Structural Betrayal: Design Differences
• Original Design consisted of one long steel support rod
per walkway for even weight distribution.
• Six individual rods (three on each side) in the original
plan for robust support.
• Fabricator rejected the initial design due to difficulties in
manufacturing a fully threaded rod.
• Instead of original design, two parallel and offset steel
rods per walkway were used, destabilizing the structure.
• Twelve rods in the altered design ended up compromising
stability and load-bearing capacity.
• The final design lacked the meticulous considerations of
the original, resulting in a fatal flaw that led to the
collapse and a devastating impact on victims below.
Silent Survivors
• The fourth-floor walkway collapsed onto the second-floor
walkway, and both fell onto the crowded lobby floor.
• The survivors not only endured physical pain but also the
psychological scars of a traumatic event.
Identifying Accountability
Changes made without due diligence.
Changes in
Hanger Rod
Design Disputed communication between fabricator
and G.C.E. International, Inc.