Start

GRADUATION INTERNSHIP
REPORT

Instructor: MR. TRAN VAN DUONG Presented by: HUYNH NGUYEN TUAN
ANH 2185764
 02

REPORT TOPIC:
THE BENEFITS OF REVIEWER'S
FEEDBACK IN IMPROVING
FUTURE TRANSLATION TASKS
 03

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
INTRODUCTION II.
ORGANIZATION III.
POSITION AND IV.
V. TASKS REPORT TOPIC
SELF- VI.
EVALUATION CONCLUSION &
RECOMMENDATIONS VII.
REFERENCES
 04

I. INTRODUCTION
 05

PERSONAL GOALS

MANAGING IMPROVE PERSONAL

ACTIVELY REQUEST AND
MEDIUM-HEAVY SKILLSET AND
RECEIVE FEEDBACK
WORKLOAD PROFESSIONAL
RELATIONSHIP
 06

II. ORGANIZATION
 07

2.1. COMPANY OVERVIEW

COMPANY NAME: CÔNG TY TNHH PHIÊN DỊCH CHUYÊN NGHIỆP QUỐC TẾ

ADDRESS: 1B FLOOR, HOLISTAY BUILDING, 2/3A NGUYEN THI MINH KHAI,

DA KAO WARD, DISTRICT 1, HO CHI MINH CITY

THE COMPANY’S MOTTO: “QUALITY COMES FIRST”

 08

2.2. COMPANY STRUCTURE

 09

2.3. WORKING ENVIRONMENT

 10

III. POSITION & TASKS

 11

3.1. WORK METHODS & RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1.1. WRITTEN TRANSLATION
12
 13

3.1.2. ORAL INTERPRETING JOBS

14
 15

IV. REPORT TOPIC

THE BENEFITS OF REVIEWER'S
FEEDBACK IN IMPROVING
FUTURE TRANSLATION TASKS
 17

4.1. ISSUE INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS

The work of a translator consists of inputting data consistent of the source language (SL) into the target
language (TL) in fitting manner. It has to match the SL’s meaning, tone, and style.
(Sujannah, 2017)

There is no such thing as an all-knowing translator

The translator’s experience is an increasing curve that goes up along with the time they have spent
working in the business (Thelen et al., 2016).
 18

Technical translation relies on accuracy and sameness between the languages, rather than using emotional,
or meaningful synonyms that can replace phrases or idioms.

Civil service forms, banking statements and similar types of paperwork are formulaic - they can be
tweaked and changed data-wise, but the structure stays the same.

I was (overly) confident in my own skills - getting complacent in the workplace because my translated
products rarely encounter serious errors.
 19

4.2. IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ON COMMON

ERRORS

“XXC2023I83G5XN”
20
 21

4.3. PERSONAL ENHANCEMENTS

 22

4.4. FEEDBACK FROM THE SUPERVISOR

 23

V. SELF-EVALUATION
 24

Personal strength:
• Good vocabulary, improved technique, speed and efficiency compared to previous internship
• Manage heavy workload well, able to handle pressure of deadlines
• Maintain friendly relationship with co-workers

Weaknesses:
• Late for work due to personal reasons
• Weak constitution, gets sick often
 25

VI. CONCLUSION &

RECOMMENDATION
 26

VII. REFERENCES
• Lisaitè, D., Vandepitte, S., Maylath, B., Mousten, B., Castel-Branco, M. C. a. E., & Minacori, P. (2016).
Negotiating meaning at a distance: Peer feedback in electronic learning translation environments.
Negotiating Meaning at a Distance, 99–116. https://core.ac.uk/download/481058451.pdf
• Sujannah, W. D. (2017). Online peer feedback as a strategy to improve students’ translation skills. Jurnal
Pendidikan Humaniora, 5(4), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.17977/um030v5i42017p168
• Thelen, M., Van Egdom, G., Verbeeck, D., Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Bogucki, Ł. (2016).
Translation and meaning: New series. Lodz Studies in Language.
 Finish

THANK YOU
FOR LISTENING