The document discusses Hesiod's myths of Prometheus and Pandora from his works Theogony and Works and Days. It examines how the myths portray the relationship between gods and humans, with the gods showing little care or fairness towards humans. Prometheus steals fire for humanity, angering Zeus who punishes humans. Pandora is created by Zeus to punish Prometheus' brother, opening a jar containing evils. The myths reflect Greek views of gender roles and anxieties around women's power.
Original Description:
introducing the love story of prometheus and pandora
The document discusses Hesiod's myths of Prometheus and Pandora from his works Theogony and Works and Days. It examines how the myths portray the relationship between gods and humans, with the gods showing little care or fairness towards humans. Prometheus steals fire for humanity, angering Zeus who punishes humans. Pandora is created by Zeus to punish Prometheus' brother, opening a jar containing evils. The myths reflect Greek views of gender roles and anxieties around women's power.
The document discusses Hesiod's myths of Prometheus and Pandora from his works Theogony and Works and Days. It examines how the myths portray the relationship between gods and humans, with the gods showing little care or fairness towards humans. Prometheus steals fire for humanity, angering Zeus who punishes humans. Pandora is created by Zeus to punish Prometheus' brother, opening a jar containing evils. The myths reflect Greek views of gender roles and anxieties around women's power.
look at the myth of Prometheus and Pandora as it appears in Theogony and in Hesiod’s other poem, “Works and Days”
We will consider the implications of this myth for
the Greek view of society and particularly of women and gender roles, plus e will consider the nature of the gods as it reflected in Theogony and what the essential differences are between gods and humans. Theogony concentrates on the coming-into-being of the gods, it does not contain a creation story for humans at all.
The subject of Theogony is the gods, and its
purpose is to describe how they arranged and developed their society. Humans are largely irrelevant in this context.
Humas are mentioned in Theogony, but the
creation of men (as opposed to women) is not described; they are simply there.
Men appear in Theogony when Hesiod describes
the first sacrifice at a place called Mekone. This leads into the story of Prometheus and of Pandora, the first woman. Prometheus is a Titan, the son of Iapetos (brother of Chronos) In Hesiod’s account, Prometheus tries to trick Zeus into taking the less desirable portion of the first sacrifice so that men will have the better portion. In retaliation, Zeus punishes humans. Zeus’s first reaction to Prometheus’s deceit is to hide fire from man.
Because Zeus is the god of
justice, it is striking that the heads here in what seems to be a very unjust way, punishing humans. This is our first view of the relationship between gods and humans in Greek myth. The gods do not love humans or feel compelled to treat them fairly; rather, humans are useful but expendable.
In his role as god of
justice, Zeus supervises justice between humans, this does not necessarily imply that a comparable form of justice exists. Prometheus steals the fire back for humanity, which brings down further punishment Prometheus is chained to a pillar to have his liver eaten daily by an eagle, Zeus’s sacred bird. The liver regenerates and is eaten again the next day.
Men are punished by the creation of
the first woman.
The story includes unexplained
elements: Zeus seems to have a particular grudge against Prometheus’s entire family, but Hesiod does not say why. Nor does Hesiod say why Prometheus wants to help humans. According to some later authors, Prometheus created humans, but Hesiod does not say so. Prometheus story is important on several levels
Notice that fire equals
civilization, or “culture”. What Prometheus brings men is culture. Later author say this specifically.
The impetus for his stay – the
first sacrifice – is very important in this context. Sacrifice can be seen as representing the transition from pre- civilization to civilization.
Burtkert believes that sacrifice
is a means to displace the guilt feels over hunting and killing animals. The “first sacrifice” would be the moment which hominids made the transition from guilt- free animals to guilt-feeling humans, the moment at which civilization or society in general, comes into being.
If the myth is read in this way,
it is probably no surprise that sex appears at just this point, because one function of society is to regulate the relationship between the sexes. Guilt over killing animals is not the only possible guilt men might feel over sacrifice.
When we look at the
myth from outside its original culture, we understand why humans eat the sacrificed animal. Within the culture that developed this myth, the fact that the gods receive the inferior portion of the sacrifice would be troubling.
Thus, the idea that the
establishment of sacrifice somehow entailed punishment. The story of Pandora also occurs in Hesiod’s Works and Days
In “Works and Days”, the first
woman is named; in Theogony, she is nameless.
The name Pandora is
ambiguous; it may mean “gift to all” or “all-giver”.
In “Work and Days”,
Pandora’s creation is described in more detail. In Theogony the emphasis is on Prometheus’s wrong doing and his punishment, but in “Works and Days” the emphasis is on Pandora herself
She is sent not to men in
general, but to Prometheus’s brother Epimetheus.
She has a jar that contains all
the evils of the world, as well as Hope. When Pandora opens the jar, the evils fly out, but Hope remains just under the lid of the jar. Pandora’s story is often compaired with that of the biblical Eve. The difference seem more striking than the similarities, however, and have several implications for our understanding of the relationship between the sexes in Greek mythology.
Both Pandora and Eve are
responsible for the advent of evil into the world. o Eve was created in the first place as a helper for Adam. o Pandora is evil from her very creation. Eve vs. Pandora
Eve is created out of Adams. Body, but Pandora is a
different type of creature. This seems to imply that women are seen as different in kind from men, rather than as simply the female sex of the human species.
This is our first example of the deep-seated misogyny that
runs through much of classical myth. The presence of Hope in Pandora’s jar is both striking and difficult to interpret. The most common modern interpretation is that no matter how bad things get, “we still have hope”. This view ignores two points:
Hope is still in the jar, not out
in the world the way the evils are.
If Hope is a good thing, why
is it in the jar of evils to begin with? Hope or Expectation? Another interpretation is that Hope’s retention in the jar is meant to indicate that there is no Hope, that even that small relief of evil is absent for mankind.
The key may be that the word translated as Hope, elpis, is in
fact ambiguous, both good and evil, more like expectation. Its being caught under the lip of the jar may indicate the two edged nature of elpis. The myth of pandora lends itself especially well to psychological interpretations. The jar can be read as representing Pandora’s womb.
Pandora – and all women – are responsible
for evil in that they are responsible for life itself, by giving birth.
At the same time that birth inflicts all the evils of life on the one born, it is also the only hope for continuity available to humans.
Thus, the jar/womb contains both evil and
hope. On deeper level, the description of Pandora can be seen as reflecting male anxieties about and resentments of sexual reproduction. In a strongly patriarchal society, it is all-important for man to have sons.
The only way to achieve sons is through women.
The women can be seen as controlling the man’s
ultimate destiny.
The jar, which Pandora can choose to open, could
represent this fear/resentment of female power.
We will see other examples of this anxiety and
resentment about women, along with fears of what they would do if they gained power. Several threads become evident in the overall relationship of gods and humans
The term “god” is regularly
used to translate the Greek theos, but for modern readers this translation can bring serious misconception.
Modern Western readers
tend to assume that a god must by definition by good, merciful, and just. We tend to assume that a god much by definition be omniscient and omnipotent
We tend to assume that a god
must by definition have created the universe and must feel love toward human beings.
Despite the anthropomorphic
language often used to describe God, we tend to assume that a god does not really have a body or human- like appetites and passions. All these assumptions are false for the gods of classical mythology They are not consistently good, or merciful, or even (apparently) just. Their anthropomorphism means that they share in humanity’s less appealing attributes and emotions, they can be jealous, spiteful and cruel.
Though they know a great deal, they are
not omniscient though very powerful, they are not omnipotent.
They are not transcendent. In other
words, they did not create the universe but are part of it. According to the earliest tradition, they did not even create human beings. They are not loving caretakers
They are not loving, devoted caretakers of humanity. They do
not care about us as a species and rarely even as individuals.
Although they are more than personifications of natural forces,
emotions, or processes, such personification is an important element of their characters. This helps to explain their emotional detachment from humans and their mercilessness.