This document outlines 4 potential motions for debate: 1) Seeking revenge on those who break your heart; 2) Making teacher incentives dependent on student performance; 3) Rebranding feminism as humanism; 4) Prioritizing passion over financial stability.
This document outlines 4 potential motions for debate: 1) Seeking revenge on those who break your heart; 2) Making teacher incentives dependent on student performance; 3) Rebranding feminism as humanism; 4) Prioritizing passion over financial stability.
This document outlines 4 potential motions for debate: 1) Seeking revenge on those who break your heart; 2) Making teacher incentives dependent on student performance; 3) Rebranding feminism as humanism; 4) Prioritizing passion over financial stability.
Motion 1: This House believes that it is legitimate for people to seek
revenge upon those who have broken their hearts. Motion 2: This House will make the incentives of the teachers contingent to their students’ performance. Motion 3: This House supports the re-branding of feminism to humanism. Motion 4: This House would prioritize the pursuit of passion over financial stability.