Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 38

24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 1

Lecturer: MBA | Trần Khánh


Email: tg_trankhanh_qtkd@tdtu.edu.vn
Handphone: 0946512667
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 2

CHAPTER 2

The Language of
Negotiation
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 3

Chapter Objectives

1. Identify the issues that would constitute the

bargaining mix in a variety of negotiations

2. Apply proper terminology when preparing for

and executing a negotiation

3. Identify opening offers and target and

resistance points
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 4

Chapter Objectives

4. Understand the role of a negotiator’s Best

Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)


and its impact on negotiation

5. Assess the impact of framing in negotiating and

resolving conflict

6. Understand the role of reciprocity in negotiations


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 5

1. Core I 7 – first Chip Generation – 750 Gb

2. 1st Owner bought at 22 millions by 2015

3. All Interesting Ideas  Helps Seller ( Me ) to

discover the values inside


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 6

2.1 Bargaining Mix

•The Bargaining Mix: all of the issues involved in


the negotiation
•Example: For a job offer, could include individual
priorities and alternatives, salary level, the
‘package’ including benefits – insurances, bonus,
retirement, etc.
• The more issues in the mix the greater the
likelihood both parties will walk away happy that
they secured the best overall deal
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 7
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 8
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 9
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 10

2.1 Bargaining Mix

•Too many issues makes the negotiation unwieldy

• Expanding the pie – key principle of integrative

negotiation – creating more value for everyone


involved in the negotiation
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 11

2.2 Initial Offers

• Also known as: opening offer - anchors the

negotiation and sets a boundary to it; can give


an advantage to the party who makes it
• From the seller’s perspective: it is the asking or

list price
• From the buyer’s perspective: it is the first offer

made
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 12

2.2 Initial Offers

• Who makes the first offer depends on the


negotiation, usually the seller, except in an
auction
• Good negotiators:
• Send a signal with their offer
• Leave some room to negotiate
• Research their offer
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 13
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 14

2.3 Target Point

•Target point (or aspiration) is the best outcome

each party can reasonably expect


• Target points for monetary issues should be

quantified in advance and based on researched


factual information
• Target points for non-monetary issues should be

based on as much factual information as possible


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 15

2.3 Target Point

Good negotiators:

•Set challenging goals – a target point for each issue


•Keep their target point quiet at first
•Share the information strategically
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 16
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 17

2.4 Resistance Point

• Good negotiators have a resistance point or

“reservation” amount below which they will not


go
• It is the reference point during the negotiation to

decide whether to reject or consider an offer


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 18

2.4 Resistance Point

• Typically not revealed to the other party or might

be called the “final” offer


• Not all buyers/sellers will have the same

resistance point
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 19
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 20
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 21

2.5 BATNA
(Best Alternative to a Negotiated
Agreement)
• Literally the most ideal outcome one party could get

without negotiating
• The better the alternatives, the stronger the

negotiator’s bargaining position and more likely to


make the first offer
• Thoroughly investigate all alternatives to put

yourself in the best possible negotiation position


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 22

2.6 WATNA
(Worst Alternative to a Negotiated
Agreement)

• Literally the worst outcome one party could face

if they don’t come to a negotiated agreement


• Always consider WATNA before the negotiation
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 23

2.7 Bargaining Range

• Between parties’ resistance points, also known

as the settlement zone


• If there is overlap between the points, the range

is positive and settlement is likely if sufficient


information is exchanged to indicate this
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 24
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 25
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 26

2.7 Bargaining Range

• If the resistance points match, the bargaining

range is zero and settlement is less likely due


to level of information exchange
• If there is no overlap, the zone is negative and

there will be no settlement unless one or both


parties adjust their resistance point
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 27

2.8 Settlement Point

• Is what the parties actually agree upon

• For multi-issue negotiations there is a settlement

point for each issue


• But, the parties must remember to discuss all the issues

• Overlooking issues can damage relationships when

expectations are mismatched


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 28

2.9 Approaches to Negotiating and


Resolving Conflict
• Comparison of approach to negotiation models
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 29
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 30

2.10 Approaches to Negotiating and


Resolving Conflict

• Each person approaches negotiations differently

• People approach different negotiations differently

– changing their approach depending on


circumstances
• Personality also influences the approach
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 31

2.10 Approaches to Negotiating and


Resolving Conflict
• Two types of negotiation approaches:
• Distributive – generally involve more
competitive behavior, winner and loser, little
concern for the relationship after the negotiation
ends
• Integrative – more cooperation, meeting the
needs of both parties, more concern for
maintaining the relationship after the negotiation
ends
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 32

2.11 Framing

 A frame is the lens through which one views a

negotiation
 A frame influences negotiation behaviors

 A positive frame leads to more successful outcomes

 A negative frame leads to less successful outcomes


24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 33

2.11 Framing

 The more negatively an issue is framed, the more

likely there is to be escalating conflict


 It is also possible to reframe a negotiation

 Example: purchasing a house that needs

repairs, but seller maintains that it is in good


condition – reframe to focus on repairs that
are needed as part of negotiating a discount
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 34
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 35

2.12 Reciprocity

 Reciprocity can lead to concessions in a

negotiation session
 A hardline approach or bad behavior can result

in mirroring behavior eventually leading to a


complete breakdown in a negotiation
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 36
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 37
24/12/2016 C2-The Language of Negotiation 38

You might also like