Major Project Entitled

“DISASTER MANAGEMENT ON EARTHQUAKE

USING IOT”
Under the Guidance of

Prof. Harshitha C K
Asst.Prof , Department of CSE, JCET, Hubballi
Presented by

B.Prerana Naidu 2JH20CS012

Bibi Fathima Gubbi 2JH20CS013

Danamma S Haveri 2JH20CS019

Farhatnaaz Khatib 2JH20CS024

 ABSTRACT
 With the increasing frequency and intensity of earthquakes worldwide, there is a growing need for innovative and
efficient disaster management strategies. This paper proposes an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled approach to enhance
earthquake disaster management.
 The integration of IoT technologies offers real-time monitoring, data collection, and analysis, enabling timely and
informed decision-making during and after seismic events. The proposed system leverages a network of interconnected
sensors deployed in earthquake-prone regions to detect and measure seismic activities.
 These sensors, equipped with accelerometers and other relevant instruments, continuously collect data and transmit it to
a central control system. The collected data is processed in real-time to assess the magnitude and location of the
earthquake, allowing for immediate response coordination.
 In conclusion, this IoT-based disaster management system for earthquakes presents a comprehensive and efficient
solution to enhance preparedness, response, and recovery efforts. By leveraging real-time data and advanced analytics,
the proposed system aims to mitigate the impact of earthquakes, ultimately saving lives and reducing the economic and
social consequences associated with seismic events.
 overview
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem Statement
 Literature Survey
 Methodology
 Objectives
 Hardware and Software requirements
 Block Daigram
 Components
 Advantages and applications
 Disadavantages
 Future scope
 References
 INTRODUCTION
 Among the myriad calamities, earthquakes emerge as particularly formidable adversaries, unleashing unprecedented
destruction that demands innovative solutions

 The global landscape is increasingly vulnerable to the capricious forces of nature, with earthquakes representing a
ubiquitous threat that transcends geographical boundaries

 These seismic events, characterized by their sudden onset and destructive potential, necessitate a sophisticated and
adaptive approach to disaster management.

 However, with IoT-enabled seismic sensors strategically deployed across seismic-prone regions, the speed and
precision of earthquake detection are vastly improved
 PROBLEM STATEMENT

The existing limitations in seismic disaster management, characterized by an insufficient quantity of information in
real time, communication delays and an absence of Internet of Things integration, hinder prompt and efficient
reaction efforts, therefore elevating the likelihood of casualties and property damage.
 LITERATURE SURVEY
Sl.no Title Author , year Take away for the papers
and publication
1. At risk: natural Blaikie, P.; Natural disasters can be defined as a combination of natural hazards
hazards, people's Cannon, T.; and vulnerabilities that endanger vulnerable communities that are
vulnerability and Davis, I.; Wisner, incapable of withstanding the adversities arising from them
disasters B. Routledge:
London, UK,
2020
2. Role of information Celik, S.; Human beings invariably face threats of natural as well as human-
in collective action in Corbacioglu, S made disasters, which often lead to massive damages, human
dynamic disaster Disasters 2010, suffering, and negative economic impacts. The main characteristics
environments 34, 137–154 of natural disasters are unpredictability, availability of limited
resources in impacted areas, and dynamic changes in the
environment
3 Bridging gaps in Gaillard, J.C.; Introducing disaster management policies and applying appropriate
disaster risk Mercer, J. levels of information technology and equipment offer immense
reduction Hum. Geogr. potential in enhancing the capabilities of disaster management
2013, 37, 93– policies. In addition, the evolving trends have opened massive
114 technological resources for reducing disaster risks
METHODOLOGY

Fig 1.1 System Architectures

 OBJECTIVES

 Early Detection and Warning

 Continuous Infrastructure Monitoring

 Data Analytics for Informed Decision-Making

 Efficient Search and Rescue Operations

 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
Hardware:
 Arduino/ESP8266 Boards:

Select suitable Arduino boards (e.g., Arduino Uno, Arduino Nano) for sensor integration, data processing, and
communication.
 Sensors:

Various sensors including accelerometer, gyroscope to detect and prevent loss from natural disasters
 IoT Module:

Choose an IoT communication module (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, LoRa) to enable wireless communication between
sensors and the IoT platform.
 Indicators:
Indicators such as alert systems (buzzers, LEDs) for notifying stakeholders when signs of earthquake are detected.
 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
Software:
 Arduino IDE:
The Arduino Integrated Development Environment (IDE) is essential for programming and uploading code to the
Arduino/ESP8266 boards.
 IoT Platform:
Choose an IoT platform such as ThingSpeak, AWS IoT, or Microsoft Azure IoT for data communication, storage, and
remote monitoring.
 Programming Languages:
Proficiency in programming languages such as C++ for Arduino programming and potentially other languages for
server-side development (e.g., Python, Java).
 Web Development Tools
If developing a web-based user interface, tools like HTML, CSS may be necessary.
 Collaboration Tools:
Use collaboration tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, or similar platforms for team communication and coordination.
BLOCK DIAGRAM
 COMPONENTS

• ESP8266 micro controller

• Accelerometer sensor
• Gyroscopic sensor
• Breadboard
• Jumper wires
• LEDs
• Resistors
 ADVANTAGES AND APPLICATIONS

 The goal of this project to improve early warning systems

 Automated alerts system
 Automated notification system to stake holders
 Smart infrastructure for rapid assessment
 Real-time seismic monitoring
 Real-time data transfer without delay
 DISADVANTAGES

• The present system available is in prototype stage which is not suitable for industrail applications
• And in the present model the system only warns with an alarm using LED
• To warn the people in the large scale the system has to be interfaced with web based GSM module
 FUTURE SCOPE

• The future scope of disaster management using the Internet of Things (IoT) for earthquakes holds significant
promise in enhancing early warning systems, response mechanisms, and overall resilience. Here are some
potential developments and advancements:
• Early Warning Systems:
• Machine Learning Algorithms: Advanced algorithms can analyze data from IoT devices to detect patterns
indicative of earthquake precursors, allowing for more accurate and timely predictions.
• Smart Infrastructure:
• Automated Emergency Response Systems: IoT-enabled devices can trigger automated emergency response
protocols, such as shutting down gas lines, activating alarms, and controlling elevators, to prevent further
hazards.
• Communication and Coordination:
• Drone Technology: Drones equipped with IoT sensors can be deployed to assess the extent of damage, locate
survivors, and provide real-time video feeds to aid in decision-making.
 REFERENCES
 Blaikie, P.; Cannon, T.; Davis, I.; Wisner, B. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and
Disasters; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
 Celik, S.; Corbacioglu, S. Role of information in collective action in dynamic disaster environments.
Disasters 2010, 34, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 Sutanta, H.; Bishop, I.D.B.; Rajabifard, A.R. Integrating spatial planning and disaster risk reduction at the
local level in the context of spatially enabled government. In Spatially Enabling Society Research,
Emerging Trends and Critical Assessment; Abbas, R., Joep, C., Kalantari, M., Kok, B., Eds.; Leuven
University Press: Leuven, Belgium, 2010; pp. 55–68. ISBN 978-90-5867-851-5. [Google Scholar]
 Penning-Rowsell, E.C.; Sultana, P.; Thompson, P.M. The ‘last resort’? Population movement in response
to climate-related hazards in Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 27, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 Gaillard, J.C.; Mercer, J. From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Prog. Hum.
Geogr. 2013, 37, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
THANK YOU