Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychology 180420060949
Psychology 180420060949
Psychology 180420060949
PSYCHOLOGY AND
ITS CORRELATION
TO ORTHODONTICS
PRESENTED BY
Dr ASHWANI MOHAN
INTRODUCTION
• Treatment goals of orthodontics depends on the
communication between the orthodontist and the
patient
• Psychological factors influence a patient
perception of malocclusion and treatment plan
Types of learning
1. Enactive learning – learning by doing
2. Vicarious learning - learning by observing others
• ORTHODONTICS- modern trend
3. Treatment in an open area with several treatment
stations
4. A great deal of Observational learning occurs
*Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning theory.
HIERARCHY OF NEEDS – Abraham Maslow(1954)
PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
• Areas of behavioural research and application of
practical psychology to clinical practise of psychology
into 2 categories
1. Social psychology of orthodontics
2. Orthodontic motivational psychology
• New area → educational psychology to achieve
patient compliance
• The role of doctor as a teacher than a healer
• Social psychology of orthodontics involves
1. Why patients seek orthodontic care
2. Psychosocial outcomes of orthodontic therapy
3. Use of standardised psychological instruments to
assess prospective orthodontic patients
• Orthodontic motivational psychology
4. Motivating patients to follow doctors orders →
patient compliance
5. Standardise psychological instruments → to
predict patient compliance
Social psychology of orthodontics
• WHY PATIENTS SEEK TREATMENT?
• Majority – their own initiative
• Most adolescence – “my mom thinks I need braces”
• Why do people want to look better???
• Facial appearance is a key determinant of whether or not a
person was believed to be attractive*
• Found that disfigured people: (significant skeletal discrepancy)
Difficult time in school
Less likely to do well in employment, politics or advertising
• Dento-facial appearance effect the overall quality of life
*Bull R, Rumsey N. The social psychology of facial appearance. Springer Science
& Business Media; 2012 Dec 6.
• Adams* suggested : developmental perspective for
examining social psychology of beauty
• 4 assumptions of relationship between outer attractiveness
and inner behavioural processes and outcomes extracted
1. Physical attractiveness stimulate expectation toward
one another
2. Attractiveness elicit social exchanges from others
3. Developmental outcome result from social exchanges,
consequences of reactions internalise differing social
images, self expectations, and inter personal styles
4. Greater experience with positive social interactions,
attractive people manifest confident interpersonal
behaviour
*Adams GR. Physical attractiveness, personality, and social reactions to
peer pressure. The Journal of psychology. 1977 Jul 1;96(2):287-96.
• Sincerity, intelligence, conscientiousness and good looks
were attributed to more correctly aligned teeth*
• Malocclusions are highly visible – interfere with
social interaction and acceptance
• Crooked teeth and skeletal disharmony – “cause teasing
of general playground harassment among
children and are associated with lower social
attractiveness**”
*Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the
self. Journal of consulting psychology. 1953 Oct;17(5):343. used to persons with
more aligned teeth
** Phillips C, Bennett ME, Broder HL. Dentofacial disharmony: psychological
status of patients seeking treatment consultation. The Angle Orthodontist.
1998 Dec;68(6):547-56.
PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOME OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT
• Dann et al – children with serious malocclusions do not have
poor self concept or body images*
• Did not improve after orthodontic treatment
• Albino JE on contrary said children who received
orthodontic treatment felt better about their facial
appearance**
• Why the discrepancy?
Depends on the patients attitude before the treatment
Borderline personality
• Prevalence 0.7% to 2%
• Erratic moods, impulsive and poorly controlled anger
• Begin treatment with extremely positive view point, but
changes to hatred and anger in response to complications
Antisocial personality
• Males: female – 5:1 ratio affected
• prevalence 2-3%
• Lying, theft, destructive behaviour, aggression to animals
and people, accompanied by lack of remorse
• Difficult to manage in an orthodontic office
• Handle these patient with even-handedness, not allowing
to disrupt the office procedure or abuse office personnel.
• Orthodontists should be beware of excessive dependent and
manipulative behaviour which can cause conflict among
office personnel
“DIFFICULT PATIENTS”
• According to Groves “difficult patients are typically
those who raise ‘difficult’ feelings within clinicians.
• 4 types
1. Dependent clingers
2. Entitled demanders
3. Manipulative help rejecters
4. Self destructive deniers
Dependent clingers
• Have needs for reassurance from their care givers that escalate
• Dependent on doctors
• Must be give appropriate limits with realistic expectations
• Clear verbal and written instructions to be given for reinforcing
the limits of the patient access to professional staff
Entitled demanders
• Needy but manifest it as intimidation and attempts to induce guilt
• Need to control situation and often make threats to get what
they want
• Aggressive behaviour due to dependency and fear of
abandonment
• Limits must be placed on the patient
Manipulative help rejecters
• Focus on their symptoms but are resigned toward failure
• Seem satisfied with lack of improvement
• Difficult to treat – must involve in all decision makings
and should have regular appointments
Self destructive deniers
• Take pleasure in defeating any attempts to help them
• Do not want to improve
• Sufficiently depressed to consider not rendering or
limiting treatment
ORTHODONTIST
• Should remain friendly, unemotional, professional all the
times
• Emotional outbursts should be responded to with
an acknowledgement of feelings but an expectation
of appropriate behaviour
• Non compliance must be countered with an
appropriate alternative treatment plan
• Must avoid being provoked and remain professional
and emotionally neutral while maintaining a correct
office atmosphere
PATIENTS HAVING ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATUS AND MOTIVATION
Ryan et al – 18 pts (18-40yrs)- impact of motivation
• Deformity affected in both practical and psychological aspect
• Low self esteem and embarrassment
• Coped by – avoiding social situations or continuing normal
activities while modifying their behaviour to minimise impact of
condition
Lee et al – effect on pts quality of life – 76pts - control group-
asymptomatic
1. Generic health third related
molar removal
– no – 3 questionnaire
difference significant difference
2. Generic oral health related
•3. Ryan
Condition specific quality of life
FS, Barnard M, Cunningham SJ. Impact of dentofacial deformity and motivation for treatment: a
qualitative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012 Jun 1;141(6):734-42.
• Lee S, McGrath C, Samman N. Quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformity: a comparison of
measurement approaches. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2007 Jun 1;36(6):488-92.
De Avila et al* – 50pts – to determine if exhibited depression than
non surgical cases
• Modified QOL(quality of life) – (36q) how physical health influenced
patient life
• Beck Depression Inventory (21q) – how often something bothered the
patient
• 19 pts had depression
Yu et al**- - motivation of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients – 210
pts – QOL questionnaire with oral health and self esteem measure
• Control – 219 who were not undergoing surgery
• Facial appearance improvement – #1 reason
• Men - #2 occlusion, #3 self confidence
• Women - #2 self confidence, #3 occlusion
**Yu D, Wang F, Wang X, Fang B, Shen SG. Presurgical motivations, self-esteem, and oral health
of orthognathic surgery patients. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013 May 1;24(3):743-7.
*de Ávila ÉD, de Molon RS, Loffredo LC, Massucato EM, Hochuli-Vieira E. Health-related quality
of life and depression in patients with dentofacial deformity. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2013 Sep
1;17(3):187-91.
EXPECTATIONS
• 4 categories*
1. Metamorphosizers – expectation of both physical and
psychological problems fully corrected by surgery. Likely to
be dissatisfied
2. Pragmatists – physical but no psychological change.
Lower satisfaction, as change may not be up to what
expected
3. Shedders – little physical change but profound
psychological
change, careful counselling to check true motivations
4. Evolvers – low expectation for both, dissatisfaction as
• More physical change than what the pt was ready for
• Postoperative course difficult o manage without
positive expectations for the patient
*Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice: A
guide for social science students and researchers. Sage; 2013 Nov 1.
Bullen et al *– method of examining expectation – 85 pt –
pt profile altered with incremental movement of lips to form
13 photo sequence.
• Questionnaire