SKID FABRICATION

TO BCC
Inspection of work 11-15 August 2014
Inspection team:
Rikkart Karlsson – welding engineer
Bogdan Lese – delivery engineer skids
Adrian Ceplinschi – strategic sourcing engineer

Purpose:
Evaluating the work/ welding and also the
inspection procedures and steps followed in order to
ensure a good product as per our specification

Company Confidential
Welding progress of piping

Company Confidential
Minutes of meeting
Description Action Deadline Status
MAFUMEIRA SKID ID 87 & ID 132
Break sharp edges on the structure as per M-501 TERQUA 15.08.2014 done
Visual inspection of the skids before sand blasting TERQUA 18.08.2014 done
TERQUA
Update the welding and inspection log as per Roxar requirements 20.08.2014 done

The following procedure to be sent to Roxar for pre-approval: Visual

Inspection, Magnetic Powder Inspection, Coating procedure + Report TERQUA 22.08.2014 on going
Model translated in english
Build the Painting report as per pages 31-33 on Norsok M-501 TERQUA 22.08.2014 done
Adittional test @ -46 C LEMIT 22.08.2014 on going

Pressure testing: list of components missing, equipment to be built LEMIT 22.08.2014 on going

Procedure for pressure testing to be created and submitted to Roxar for

LEMIT 26.08.2014 on going
review
instruction to install seal ring ROXAR 15.08.2014 done
front sheet for the HPT to be submitted to the supplier ROXAR 15.08.2014 done
procedure for lifting with competent person certificate to be submitted to
TERQUA 22.08.2014 on going
Roxar
Recomandation: lifting testing to be done before painting and black
Info
assembly to be done before painting

Magneting poweder testing to be done after lifting with report submited TERQUA 26.08.2014 on going

Slings to be purchase with certificate 3.1 from supplier and shipped w/

TERQUA 25.08.2014 on going
skid
ALL DOCUMENT TO BE TRANSLATED IN ENGLISH
TERQUA continuous
MANDATORY
TERQUA /
the skid to be handle with forklift form the back continuous
LEMIT
LEMIT /
protection of the hubs and flanges for the welding/sandblasting/painting continuous
TERQUA

discuss with the management regarding a 3rd party inspection for lifting ROXAR 18.06.2014 done

Welding engineer to refresh the knowledge on ISO3834-2 for welding

TERQUA 22.08.2014 done
inspection
Welding engineer to read Norsok M-101, M-601 for structure TERQUA 22.08.2014 on going

Due date for the skid 5 SEPTEMBER 2014: including documentation to TERQUA /
05.09.2014 on going
be submitted for approval as per requirement on the POS LEMIT

WEST QURNA ID132

West Qurna – suppliers to present an email with issues on the drawings TERQUA /
22.08.2014 not started
and ask to official permission to proceed with the next steps LEMIT

Company Confidential
Mismatch of info in Roxar docs
by Bogdan Lese and Rikkart Karlsson
Project 3188371 Chevron Mafumeira DSME:
1.Differences between our procedure for topside MPFM and project specific POS/ DRW
a. THE HPT front sheet for this project ROX000259160 is not included in POS, thus not sent to
supplier (here it is stated the test pressure details).
b. Procedure for HPT ROX000152556 says pressure gauges rated to minimum 1000 barg,
supplier has equipment for 700 barg – question on what bases ? our product works at 5000 psi and pressure
test is 1.5x design pressure

2. Lifting testing:
a. Procedure for MPFM skid handling ROX000239421 is not in accordance with project specific
information on the drawings (in the procedure are required WLL 3250 Kg shackles, but the drawings require
WLL 2000 Kg shackles for lifting/handling the skid )
b. the requirement is stating that the lifting inspector should be a competent person acc to ILO 2
c. Based on the old relationship and “tribal knowledge’ between RPT and Roxar, has been
decided to use a 3rd party company (Oceaneering) to do the lifting certification, but this is not mentioned
anywhere in the documentation.
d. lifting slings and shackles the only reference to this is a note on the frame drawings and not part
of POS since is requiring a lifting certificate also for the slings.
3. Cable tray and cable tray support:
a. material we specify in POS SS316 but the grade is not found on the drawings the only
statement on the drawing is SS
b. Proposal: we can use for future AISI 304 or HDP – much more cost efficient

Company Confidential
Drawing issues

wrong dimension on both skids (ID 87 & 132). The For the ID132 meter the vent is not put in the outlet piping highest point.
dimension 545 , if it is deduced from other views it is the problem will be that if you want to fill/vent the piping there will
514 mm always be air trapped above the elbow flange insertion point

The trunnion support for ID132 outlet piping is

designed with SCH XXS piping. In order to reduce the
In the Isometric view BOM for ID132 meter it there is a Nipo flange for the vent, thickness of the weld and because this is not under
but in reality we have there a elbow flange pressure (this is a support) it is advised to reduce the
thickness of this pipe.

Company Confidential
Project West Qurna
In the isometric view
BOM there are some pipe
elements with wrong
SCH: Item 3 and 9 should
be SCH 160. Item 4
should be Sch XXS (the
drawing doesn’t show but
the flange ID should be 2”
SCH XXS)

Company Confidential