Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sell-Side Best Practices and Considerations For Private Equity Buyers VFinal
Sell-Side Best Practices and Considerations For Private Equity Buyers VFinal
Sell-Side Best Practices and Considerations For Private Equity Buyers VFinal
PE are serial buyers and join a process ready to push the gas pedal. Develop a robust strategy to manage extensive data requests
They expect robust analyses and bombard with data requests (in Align internally on what level of detail will be addressed to find the
1.
absence of which, will perform their own analysis which could impact right balance between entertaining all questions vs. only providing
purchase price) must-haves (assessment based on materiality)
PE Buyers rely on consultants for buy-side diligence and usually go deep Preempt key data requests and prepare comprehensive analyses to
2. into detail. PE’s have less tolerance for unprepared sellers and assume drive value e.g., financial projections, net working capital, standalone
worst-case scenarios in the absence of granular data cost assessments, complete employee census among others
Value creation is critical for PE Buyers. Expect questions around growth Craft and align on a perspective of potential savings and
3. opportunities, target competitive performance, rationale for sale and transformational ideas in order to position the target business for
potential investments needed growth
PE Buyers have strong cost efficiency targets and make a push for Understand operational intricacies, and have supplier contracts
5.
negotiations with suppliers as much as possible readily available and understand where value opportunities lie
PE Buyers usually require a final TSA schedule with costing as a pre- Evaluate pre-signing team carefully and bring the right SMEs under
7. signing requirement with conditions that costing may be allowed to the tent to be able to complete key TSA requests
move only by a certain margin (See subsequent slide for detailed TSA implications for PE Buyers)
PE advisors are often working point-to-point; don’t assume that all Clearly align on workstream owners from the Buyer and Seller side
8.
advisors are talking to each other during the negotiation period and make sure to bring advisors along the journey
Buyer will be responsible for stand-up and will Buyers will often be driven by synergies and Spin-Co will rely on the Parent for stand-up
Relationship with negotiate TSA aggressively their integration strategy
Counterparty High degree of confidence due to aligned
Diverging interests Competitive or diverging interests interests and history as combined company
Focus will be on developing robust TSA Exit Focus will be on “Spirit” of agreement captured
Plans to ensure Buyer quickly stands up Focus will be on managing performance and
short timeframe Regulatory limitations may apply on types of
TSA Focus Areas capabilities due to heavy reliance on TSAs
Rigorous operational and legal documentation TSAs
Rigorous operational and legal documentation will be needed
will be needed Planning to the practical level
* Duration may vary based on buyer’s capabilities and level and complexity of entanglements
Others 6%
Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 6
Appendix
This report is based on a survey of professionals from 100 global organizations who were recently involved in divestitures or activities as sellers. Deloitte
engaged a third party to perform the survey on our behalf. The survey was conducted from January through the end of February 2020, as the COVID-19
pandemic started to be seen. Then, to gain additional insights and perspective, we interviewed Deloitte leaders who are helping organizations shape their
M&A strategies in response to the pandemic.
Of the total survey respondents, 59 percent are C-suite members, and The survey captured global organizations with headquarters in the Americas
the remainder are at least vice presidents that led or were a part of (54 percent), Europe and Middle East (31 percent), and Asia-Pacific (15
their organizations’ corporate development teams. Two-thirds of percent).
surveyed companies have more than $1 billion in yearly revenue, and North America Europe
18 percent have more than $5 billion. The organizations surveyed
53% 24%
represent a cross-section of sectors.
20%
Finacial Services
27%
Energy, Resources & Industrials 1% 7% 15%