Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defining Team Success
Defining Team Success
Team composition
Characteristics of the task
Group process
Organizational context
Team Composition
A team’s performance depends on the qualities of the
individuals performing the task.
The team’s members must also have social skills to
communicate with team members.
Good teams have good team members.
Biederman (1997) determined that much of the success of
these groups was due to the leaders’ ability to recruit
highly competent team members.
Interdisciplinary research teams are more productive than
teams whose members have similar background.
Teams whose members have diverse opinion are more
creative than like-minded teams.
Management teams whose members have different
backgrounds are more innovative than are homogeneous
teams (Guzzo & Dickson, 1996).
The advantages of diversity are seen when members are
both highly skilled and committed to their team’s goals.
Teams require that team members have the skills to work
together as a team. Interpersonal skills, problem-solving
skills, and teamwork skills may be used as selection
criteria for team members, may be taught to team
members, or may be inducted through the use of
facilitators (Carnevale, Gainer, & Meltzer, 1990).
Characteristics of the task
Teams can be used to perform a variety of types of tasks, and tasks vary in how well suited they are
for teamwork.
A good team task motivates team members and requires coordinated activity.
Teams require both appropriate tasks and organizational support for those tasks.
McGrath (1984) developed a system to describe the different types of tasks that teams perform,
based on four team goals—generate, choose, negotiate, and execute.
Generation includes tasks that focus on the creative generation of new ideas and tasks that develop
plans for behavioral action.
Choosing deals with intellective tasks, such as problem solving, when there are correct answers and
decision-making tasks when there are no correct answers.
Negotiation includes tasks aimed at resolving conflicting viewpoints and mixed-motive tasks
aimed at resolving conflicts of interest.
Execution refers to competitive tasks that help resolve conflicts of power and performance tasks
designed to make things or provide services.
Group Process
Team members must be able to combine efforts successfully.
Effective teams organize themselves to perform tasks, develop social relations to support their operations, and assign
leaders who can provide direction and facilitate team operations.
Teams communicate in order to make decisions and perform tasks.
Teams may encounter problems with decision making. Teams are imperfect decision makers and do not always fully
use their collected knowledge and skills. Team decisions may be disrupted by personal bias, distorted by the desire to
maintain good relationships, or impaired by the desire to make decisions quickly. Teams often become prematurely
committed to the first acceptable solution instead of taking a structured approach to problem solving.
Highly effective teams have task-oriented goals and norms, and these teams outperform collections of individuals.
Working in a team can lead to reduced effort by individual members rather than encouraging performance (Social
loafing).
Internal social relations should provide support for the team. Team members must communicate well, work
cooperatively together, and provide emotional support for one another.
Teams with high levels of group cohesion and good social relations are the most effective teams. If a team is riddled
with conflict and divided into cliques, or if it acts competitively rather than cooperatively, communication can break
down.
It is the leader’s responsibility to provide direction for the team and facilitate its internal processes. Depending on the
tasks and team maturity, groups require different types of leadership.
Organizational context
The organizational context has a significant effect on
whether teams operate successfully (Guzzo & Dickson,
1996).
Teams may be used to improve the operations of
organizations, but teams are sensitive to their organizational
environments and need the right conditions to succeed.
The organizational context relates to the culture of the
organization, the support it provides for teams, and its
evaluation and reward systems.
Teams are more likely to be successful in organizations with
supportive organizational cultures. Supportive cultures
encourage open communication and collaborative effort.
Teams perform better when they have clear goals and well-
defined tasks. They must be provided with adequate
resources, including financial, staffing, and training support.
Reliable information from the organization is required for
teams to make decisions, coordinate their efforts with other
parts of the organization, and plan for future changes.
Finally, technical and group process assistance should be
available to the teams.
A team needs feedback on its performance and an incentive
to change.
Team members can provide support for one another, but an
effective team requires feedback from the organization and
rewards for good performance.
Characteristics of successful
teams
What makes successful teams ?
Teams require clear, well-defined goals to provide direction and motivation to allow for
performance evaluation.
Leaders keep teams focused on goals and facilitate team activities.
The organization’s culture and systems must be compatible with teamwork and
organizations must supply teams with the necessary power and resources (personnel,
financial means, training) for task performance.
Tasks must be suitable for teamwork.
Tasks should require coordinated effort and be both challenging and motivating.
Team members should have a sense of common fate or mutual accountability.
Efforts must be evaluated and rewarded in a fair manner.
Positive Psychology view of
Team success
Positive psychology is a recent and important movement within psychology that
studies people’s strengths and how to promote positive functioning (Mills, Fleck, &
Kozikowki, 2013).
Many positive psychology factors are examined in the study of teamwork because of
its focus on personal development.
Positive psychology provides an alternative perspective to the meaning of team success
and the factors that contribute to it.
The positive psychology approach to teamwork leads to better team performance by
focusing on the emotional and cognitive benefits to team members.
It provides an alternative perspective on the meaning of team success and how to
promote more effective teamwork.
Many positive psychology factors are examined in the study of teamwork, such as the
impact of supportive personal relations, reflexivity and learning, team efficacy,
empowerment, supportive leadership, and appreciative inquiry (Mills et al., 2013).