Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gec 105 Chapter 1
Gec 105 Chapter 1
Gec 105 Chapter 1
CHAPTER
INTRODUCTION TO HISTORY:
1
DEFINITION, ISSUES, SOURCES, AND
METHODOLOGY
Objectives
•To understand the meaning of history as an academic discipline and to
be familiar with the underlying philosophy and methodology of the
discipline.
•To examine and assess critically the value of historical evidences and
sources.
•To appreciate the importance of history in the social and national life
of the Philippines.
Definition and Subject Matter
• History being the “study of the past“ doesn’t give justice to its
complexity and importance human civilization
• Historia (Greek) “knowledge acquired through inquiry or
investigation”
• Historia (Latin) - account of the past of a person or a group of
people through written documents and historical evidences.
• Early 20th century, historians wrote about the lives of important
individuals like monarchs, heroes, saints, and nobilities; they were
focused on wars, revolutions, nobilities, etc.
• Traditional historians believed “no document, no history“
Definition and Subject Matter
• Other valid sources were realized because it was a
discrimination against social classes not recorded in paper
(nobilities vs. indigenous groups)
⚬ word of mouth
⚬ others had their written documents destroyed in
wars/colonizations
• valid sources
⚬ ex. epics and songs, artifacts, architecture, and memory
• History became more inclusive and collaborating with other
disciplines like archaeologists, etc.
Questions and Issues in History
What is History? Why study history? And history for whom?
How was a certain historical text written? Who wrote it? What was the
context of its publication? What historical method was employed?
What were the sources used?
Two kinds:
• Primary
⚬ sources produced at the same time as
the event, period, or subject being
studied.
• Secondary
⚬ sources, which were produced by an
author who used primary sources to
produce the material.
How to evaluate historical
sources
• Primary
1. Date – when was it produced?
2. Localization – where did it originate?
3. Authorship – who wrote it?
4. Analysis – what pre-existing material served as
the basis for its production?
5. Integrity – what was its original form?
6. Credibility – what is the evidential value of its
content?
Criticism of Sources
EXTERNAL CRITICISM
⚬ the practice of verifying the authenticity of evidence by examining its physical
cháracteristics; consistency with the historical characteristic of the time when it was
produced; and the materials used for the evidence
INTERNAL CRITICISM
⚬ the examination of the truthfulness and factuality of the evidence by looking at the
author of the source, its context, the agenda behind its creation, the knowledge
which informed it, and its intended purpose, among others.
⚬ It looks at the content of the source and examines the circumstance of its
production.
How to evaluate Internal Criteria