Q. Hypothetical Limited is contemplating having an access to a machine for a
period of 5 years Discussions with various financial institutions have shown that the company can have the use of machine for the stipulated period through leasing arrangement, or the requisite amount can be borrowed at 14 per cent to buy the machine. The firm is in the 50 per cent tax bracket. In case of leasing, the firm would be required to pay an annual end-of-year rent of `1,20,000 for 5 years. All maintenance, insurance and other costs are to be borne by the lessee. In the case of purchase of the machine (which costs `3,43,300), the firm would have a 14 per cent, 5-year loan, to be paid in 5 equal instalments, each instalment becoming due at the end of each year. The machine would be depreciated on a straight line basis for tax purposes, with no salvage value. Advise the company regarding the option it should go for, assuming lease rentals are paid (a) in advance (b)at the end of the year. Q. The following details relate to an investment proposal of the Hypothetical Industries Ltd (HIL): — • Investment outlay, 180 lakh • Useful life, 3 years • Net salvage value after 3 years, 18 lakh • Annual tax relevant rate of depreciation, 40 per cent • The HIL has two alternatives to choose from to finance the investment: Alternative I : Borrow and buy the equipment. The cost of capital of the HIL, 0.12; marginal rate of tax, 0.35; cost of debt, 0.17 per annum. . Alternative II : Lease the equipment from the Hypothetical Leasing Ltd on a 3-year full-payout basis @ `444/`1,000 payable annually in arrear. The lease can be renewed for a further period of 3 years at a rental of 18/1,000 payable annually in arrear. Which alternative should the HIL choose? Why? • Consider the Debt- Displacement Debt Effect of Leasing- • We are taking assumption or premise that Lease Finance displaces an equal amount of long term debt. • The interest tax shields on the displaced debt are also explicitly considered. • (In NAL method , we use of debt (not cost of capital )to find out PV of lease rentals as we are finding the benefit of leasing instead of borrowing . And the PV of Tax shield are arrived at by using the opportunity cost of capital. And • We also use the PV of leasing rentals as the amount that will be borrowed. Q. The following details relate to an investment proposal of the Hypothetical Industries Ltd (HIL): — • Investment outlay, 180 lakh • Useful life, 3 years
• Net salvage value after 3 years, 18 lakh
• Annual tax relevant rate of depreciation, 40 per cent • The HIL has two alternatives to choose from to finance the investment: Alternative I : Borrow and buy the equipment. The cost of capital of the HIL, 0.12; marginal rate of tax, 0.35; cost of debt, 0.17 per annum. • Alternative II : assume the lease rental of `35/`1,000 payable monthly in advance. Compute the NAL(L). Should the HIL opt for the lease financing?