Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Analysis of Political Development
Critical Analysis of Political Development
Critical Analysis of Political Development
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
The Hindus and the British criticized a It was the desire of the Muslims that
lot on Iqbal’s address. The Hindus they should be acknowledged as a
declared it the dream of a mad man or separate identity. Allama Iqbal’s
a poet, not that of a sensible man. They Allahabad address clearly reveals this
said that this was an illegal solution fact. The Muslims could not tolerate
and could not be practiced in the sub- that their religious, political and social
continent. rights should be denied to them.
• Background
• Government of India Act 1919 Hindus was not satisfy.
• Simon Commission Report Hindus also rejected, Hindus demand self Government for the people of India.
• British refused to accept, then Hindus started civil disobedience after that British said so make you own constitution.
• Hindus give Nehru Report of 1928.
• Quaid-e-Azam given 14 points.
• Objective
The primary objective of the Round Table Conferences was to discuss constitutional reforms for India and to find a consensus among
Indian political leaders and British authorities on the future governance of the country.
• Participants
The conferences included representatives from different political parties and communities in India, such as the Indian National Congress,
the All India Muslim League, the Sikhs, and others. However, the Congress party boycotted the second Round Table Conference.
• The first conference took place in November 1930 and continued until January
1931, in Royal Gallery House of Lords at London.
• In this conference Muslim leaders i.e., Quaid Azam, Sir Muhammad Shafi,
Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar and Zafarullah khan participated.
• The members of congress were absent because most of them were in jail and
rest busy in civil disobedience campaign.
• Outcome
First round table conference end without any exact conclusion.
• Outcome
Second round table conference is also failure, many disagreement and conflict among participants.
• Outcome
The British Govt. issued a White paper based on the recommendation of all three conferences from
the different parties which is known as Government of India Act 1935.
GIA 1935
Number of Dyarchy
Voters removed from
Increased Province
ALPINE SKILevel
HOUSE
ALPINE SKI HOUSE
Dyarchy British Empower
Reintroduced at Viceroy
Federal Level
GIA 1935
Analysis
British Governor
Elite class only
intervene in
Legislation
vote
ALPINE SKI HOUSE
Nehro mentions GIA
1935 as the “Charter of
slavery” and compare it
with a “Machine with
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
The elections were held in January and February of 1937.congress won the absolute
majority in the five provinces and was the largest province in four other. It was
invited to united provinces, the central provinces, Bihar, Orissa, madras, Bombay
and later, Assam and the three remaining provinces(Punjab, Sindh and Bengal)
where there was a Muslim majority, the league did not fare well. it won only 109
out of 482 seats while on the other hand congress won huge number of votes,
however, which seats reserved for Muslims. The election had not been a success for
the muslin league
Reason behind Muslim league performance in election 1937 The Muslims league
did not do well in the elections of 1937 because of three reasons Because of Jinnah's
voluntary exile Because of less experienced leaders and the last Because of less
political amongst people
• All India Muslim League (AIML) demanded separate electorates for Muslims.
• AIML passed the Lahore Resolution, also known as the Pakistan Resolution, advocating
for a separate Muslim state.
• The political landscape witnessed growing tension between Muslim and Hindu leaders.
• AIML gained momentum as the voice of Muslim interests in British India.
• The outbreak of World War II shifted the focus of political leaders towards supporting the
British war effort.
• Some Muslim leaders, like Muhammad Ali Jinnah, continued to press for Muslim rights
within the framework of a united India.
• The Congress Party's refusal to cooperate with the British government led to a political
deadlock.
• The Muslim League gained popularity among Muslims, positioning itself as the sole
representative of their interests.
• The Muslim League held its annual session in Lahore, where the Lahore Resolution was
formally adopted, demanding a separate homeland for Muslims.
• The resolution laid the groundwork for the creation of Pakistan.
• Jinnah's leadership within the Muslim League strengthened, as he emerged as the driving
force behind the demand for Pakistan.
• The Lahore Resolution marked a significant shift in the political landscape, with the
demand for a separate Muslim state becoming a central issue.
• The Muslim League intensified its efforts to rally support for the idea of Pakistan among
Muslims across British India.
• Jinnah continued to negotiate with British authorities, seeking their support for the
creation of Pakistan.
• The Congress Party, under Gandhi and Nehru, remained opposed to the idea of partition
and continued to advocate for a united India.
• The political situation became increasingly polarized between supporters and opponents
of Pakistan, laying the groundwork for the eventual partition of British India.
BACK GROUND:
• Towards end of 1943 The war situation started to look promising for
those in grand alliance The three countries were now able to look
forward The destruction of GERMONEY and its allies.
• AGGREMENTS OF THIS CONFRENCE BY THREE COUNTRIES:
• PROCESS
• CONCLUSION:
From 1942-1944 Tehran witnessed a transformative period, a pivotal
diplomatic event shaping world war2 strategies.
Elections of 1945-46
Process
Outcome
Conclusion
The impasse between the demands of the Muslim League and the Congress Party.
The legacy of this period is complex, laying the foundation for the state of
Pakistan but also setting the stage for ongoing conflicts and
challenges in the region.